Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Life Imprisonment Confirmed for Knife Attack on Watchman. Accused's Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Extrajudicial Confession Found Credible.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Mohammed Rafiq Shahabuddin Shaikh, was convicted by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge-2, Thane, for the offence of murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 5,000. The prosecution case was that on 8 November 2007, the appellant inflicted knife blows on the deceased Devendra Thapa @ Chavan, a watchman, because the watchman did not obey his orders to irrigate plants at his home. The first informant, Aayub Shaikh, who resided in the same building, witnessed the incident and also heard the appellant make an extrajudicial confession. The appellant was arrested and charged. The trial court convicted him, leading to this appeal. The High Court examined the evidence, including the testimony of the first informant and the extrajudicial confession. The court found the eyewitness testimony to be consistent and credible, and the extrajudicial confession was made voluntarily and without coercion. The court held that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction based on eyewitness testimony and extrajudicial confession - The appellant was convicted for murdering a watchman by inflicting knife blows. The court upheld the conviction, finding the eyewitness account of the first informant and the extrajudicial confession made by the accused to be credible and reliable. (Paras 1-13)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murder is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence under Section 302 IPC upheld.

Law Points

  • Murder
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Eyewitness testimony
  • Extrajudicial confession
  • Credibility of witnesses
  • Life imprisonment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (06) 74

Criminal Appeal No. 731 of 2013

2018-06-29

B. R. Gavai, Sarang V. Kotwal

Mr. Shekhar A Ingawale for the Appellant, Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh APP for the Respondent State

Mohammed Rafiq Shahabuddin Shaikh

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Section 302 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for murder

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable on the basis of eyewitness testimony and extrajudicial confession

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence was insufficient and that the extrajudicial confession was not voluntary. Respondent argued that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.

Ratio Decidendi

The eyewitness testimony of the first informant, coupled with the extrajudicial confession made by the accused, was sufficient to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. The court found no reason to interfere with the trial court's findings.

Judgment Excerpts

Being aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge2 Thane, thereby convicting the Appellant for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, sentencing him to undergo life imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs 5000/ and in default thereof to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months, Appellant has approached this Court.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge-2, Thane, for murder under Section 302 IPC. He appealed to the High Court of Judicature at Bombay.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 307
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 19...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against IAS Officer in Arms License Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Sanction. The court held that unexplained delay of 20 years and absence of valid sanction under Section 197 CrPC vitiate the prose...