Case Note & Summary
The petitioner, a minor girl, obtained admission to the MBBS course at Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Medical College, Amravati, in 2012 based on her claim as a Scheduled Tribe (Mannerwarlu). Her claim was forwarded to the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee, Aurangabad, for verification. Initially, she was given protection, but later the Committee invalidated her claim by order dated 30.11.2012. The petitioner challenged this order by way of a writ petition. The petitioner's counsel argued that the claim was supported by validity certificates in favor of the petitioner's father's cousins, Balaji (dated 24.06.2011) and Madhav Ramji (dated 23.03.2006), and that the caste of the petitioner, her brother, and her father was recorded as Mannerwarlu in school records and caste certificates. The Court, after hearing the parties, found that the Committee had not properly considered these pieces of evidence. The Court held that the validity certificates of close relatives and consistent school records are strong evidence supporting the claim. Consequently, the Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order, and directed the Committee to issue a validity certificate to the petitioner within four weeks. The Court also disposed of the connected civil applications.
Headnote
A) Scheduled Tribes - Caste Certificate Verification - Validity of Claim - The petitioner's claim for Scheduled Tribe status (Mannerwarlu) was invalidated by the Committee. The Court held that the Committee failed to give due weight to the validity certificates of the petitioner's father's cousins (Balaji and Madhav) and the consistent school records of the petitioner, her brother, and father showing the caste as Mannerwarlu. The Court set aside the impugned order and directed the Committee to issue a validity certificate. (Paras 1-5)
Issue of Consideration
Whether the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee erred in invalidating the petitioner's claim for Scheduled Tribe status (Mannerwarlu) despite the existence of validity certificates in favor of close relatives and consistent school records.
Final Decision
The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 30.11.2012 passed by respondent No. 2 is quashed and set aside. Respondent No. 2 is directed to issue validity certificate to the petitioner within four weeks. Rule is made absolute accordingly. Civil Application Nos. 6041 of 2013 and 10027 of 2016 are disposed of.
Law Points
- Scheduled Tribe certificate validity
- Mannerwarlu caste
- reliance on validity certificates of close relatives
- school records as evidence
- burden of proof on committee
Case Details
2018 LawText (BOM) (06) 18
Writ Petition No. 10715 of 2012
S. V. Gangapurwala, A. M. Dhavale
Shri. S. M. Vibhute (petitioner), Shri. P. S. Patil (respondent/State), Shri. R. R. Karpe (respondent No. 3), Shri. K. C. Sant (respondent No. 4)
Kum. Pallavi D/o Dattatraya Kaletwad (minor, through father/natural guardian Dattatraya s/o Baliram Kaletwad)
1. The State of Maharashtra, 2. The Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee Aurangabad, 3. The Dean, Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Medical College, Amravati, 4. The Registrar, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik
Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more)
Subscribe Now
Nature of Litigation
Writ petition challenging the order of the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee invalidating the petitioner's claim for Scheduled Tribe status.
Remedy Sought
The petitioner sought quashing of the Committee's order dated 30.11.2012 and issuance of a validity certificate for Scheduled Tribe (Mannerwarlu).
Filing Reason
The petitioner's claim for Scheduled Tribe status was invalidated by the Committee despite having validity certificates of close relatives and consistent school records.
Previous Decisions
The Committee invalidated the petitioner's claim by order dated 30.11.2012.
Issues
Whether the Committee erred in invalidating the petitioner's claim for Scheduled Tribe status despite the existence of validity certificates of close relatives and consistent school records.
Submissions/Arguments
The petitioner's counsel submitted that the claim was supported by validity certificates in favor of the petitioner's father's cousins (Balaji and Madhav) and that the caste of the petitioner, her brother, and her father was recorded as Mannerwarlu in school records and caste certificates.
Ratio Decidendi
The validity certificates of close relatives and consistent school records are strong evidence supporting a claim for Scheduled Tribe status, and the Committee must give due weight to such evidence.
Judgment Excerpts
The petitioner assails the order of respondent No. 2 the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee Aurangabad, whereby the petitioner's claim for Scheduled Tribe (Mannerwarlu) was invalidated by Judgment dt. 30.11.2012.
There is validity certificate in favour of the petitioner's father's cousin Balaji dt. 24.06.2011 and in favour of Madhav Ramji petitioner's father's paternal cousin dt. 23.03.2006.
The caste of the petitioner, her brother and her father has been recorded as Mannerwarlu in school record and caste certificates were issued in favour of her brother and father.
Procedural History
The petitioner obtained admission to MBBS course in 2012 based on her Scheduled Tribe claim. The claim was forwarded to the Committee for verification. The Committee invalidated the claim by order dated 30.11.2012. The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 10715 of 2012 challenging the order. The petition was heard and finally disposed of on 06.06.2018.
