Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Applicant in Religious Offences Case — No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Court holds that mere allegations without specific intent to promote enmity or outrage religious feelings do not constitute offences under Sections 153A, 295, 294, 354 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 31
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Rajaram Shankar Patwardhan, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking quashment of First Information Report (FIR) No. 0287 of 2017 registered at Mukundwadi Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 153A, 294, 295, 354 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The FIR was lodged by the State of Maharashtra through the police. The applicant contended that the allegations in the FIR did not disclose any prima facie case against him and that the continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law. The court heard the learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Paranjape, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and the learned counsel for respondent No. 2, Mr. Thombre. After considering the submissions and perusing the FIR, the court found that the allegations lacked specific intent to promote enmity between different groups or to outrage religious feelings, which are essential ingredients of the offences under Sections 153A and 295 IPC. The court also noted that the allegations under Sections 294 and 354 IPC were not made out on the face of the record. Consequently, the court allowed the application, quashed the FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom, and made the rule absolute.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashment of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Inherent Powers - Applicant sought quashment of FIR alleging offences under Sections 153A, 294, 295, 354 IPC - Court examined whether allegations made out a prima facie case - Held that no specific intent to promote enmity or outrage religious feelings was disclosed, and the FIR was liable to be quashed to prevent abuse of process (Paras 3-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and proceedings under Sections 153A, 294, 295, 354 read with 34 IPC should be quashed for lack of prima facie case.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. FIR No. 0287 of 2017 registered at Mukundwadi Police Station and all proceedings arising therefrom are quashed. Rule is made absolute.

Law Points

  • Quashment of FIR
  • No prima facie case
  • Sections 153A
  • 294
  • 295
  • 354 IPC
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Abuse of process of law
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (04) 28

Criminal Application No. 4746 of 2017

2018-04-20

Prasanna B. Varale, Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi

Mr. Paranjape Prakash S., Menezes Joslyn A., Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, Mr. C. V. Thombre

Rajaram Shankar Patwardhan

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashment of FIR

Remedy Sought

Quashment of FIR No. 0287 of 2017 and all proceedings arising therefrom

Filing Reason

Allegations in FIR did not disclose prima facie case for offences under Sections 153A, 294, 295, 354 IPC

Issues

Whether the FIR discloses a prima facie case for offences under Sections 153A, 294, 295, 354 IPC? Whether the continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that the FIR does not disclose any prima facie case and is liable to be quashed. Respondents opposed the application, but the court found no merit in their submissions.

Ratio Decidendi

For quashment of FIR under Section 482 CrPC, the court must examine whether the allegations, even if taken at face value, constitute any offence. If no prima facie case is made out, the FIR is liable to be quashed to prevent abuse of process.

Judgment Excerpts

By the present application, the applicant is before this Court seeking quashment of first information report vide Crime No. 0287 of 2017 lodged by Mukundwadi Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 153A, 294, 295, 354 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Criminal Application No. 4746 of 2017 under Section 482 CrPC before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking quashment of FIR No. 0287 of 2017. The court heard the parties and passed the judgment on 20-04-2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 153A, 294, 295, 354, 34
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses BMC Appeal in Property Tax Rateable Value Dispute — Upholds Small Causes Court Order Setting Aside Enhancement for Non-Compliance with MMC Act Sections 162(2) and 167. Notice of Enhancement Not Properly Served and No Per...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Occupier's Challenge to Deposit Condition in Property Tax Appeal. Section 217(5) of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Allows Appellate Court to Impose Deposit Condition Despite Section 209(3) Limitation on Occupier's ...