Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Orders of Vocational Education Teachers — Transfer Orders Quashed for Non-Compliance with Government Resolution and Lack of Reasoned Consideration of Representations. The court held that the respondents failed to follow the Government Resolution dated 30.06.2008 which required reasoned orders on representations before effecting transfers.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 100
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who were teachers in Government Technical Schools under the Vocational Education and Training Department, challenged their transfer orders issued by the respondents. They contended that the transfers were made in violation of the Government Resolution dated 30.06.2008, which mandated that transfers should be effected only after considering the representations of the affected employees and passing reasoned orders. The petitioners had submitted representations against their transfers, but the respondents did not consider them and passed mechanical orders. The court examined the Government Resolution and found that the respondents had not complied with its provisions. The court held that the transfer orders were unsustainable and quashed them. However, the court granted liberty to the respondents to pass fresh transfer orders after considering the petitioners' representations and passing reasoned orders in accordance with the Government Resolution. The court also directed that the petitioners be allowed to continue at their present places of posting until fresh orders are passed.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Transfer - Government Resolution dated 30.06.2008 - Validity of Transfer Orders - The petitioners challenged their transfer orders on the ground that they were issued without following the policy laid down in the Government Resolution dated 30.06.2008, which required transfers to be made only after considering representations and passing reasoned orders. The court held that the respondents failed to comply with the said Government Resolution and quashed the transfer orders, directing the respondents to consider the petitioners' representations afresh and pass reasoned orders. (Paras 1-10)

B) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Reasoned Order - Consideration of Representation - The court emphasized that administrative authorities must pass reasoned orders while considering representations against transfer orders, as per the Government Resolution. The failure to do so renders the transfer orders unsustainable. (Paras 5-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer orders of the petitioners were valid and in compliance with the Government Resolution dated 30.06.2008, and whether the respondents failed to consider the petitioners' representations in a reasoned manner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the transfer orders, and directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' representations afresh and pass reasoned orders in accordance with the Government Resolution dated 30.06.2008. The petitioners were allowed to continue at their present postings until fresh orders are passed.

Law Points

  • Transfer policy
  • Government Resolution
  • reasoned order
  • consideration of representation
  • administrative law
  • natural justice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (04) 7

Writ Petition No. 242 of 2013 with Civil Application No. 607 of 2013 and Civil Application No. 14134 of 2013

0000-00-00

Kishor s/o. Rangnathrao Kulkarni & Ors.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging transfer orders of teachers in Government Technical Schools.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of transfer orders and direction to allow petitioners to continue at their present postings.

Filing Reason

Transfer orders were issued without following the Government Resolution dated 30.06.2008 and without considering representations.

Issues

Whether the transfer orders were in compliance with the Government Resolution dated 30.06.2008? Whether the respondents failed to consider the petitioners' representations in a reasoned manner?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that transfer orders were issued in violation of Government Resolution dated 30.06.2008 which required consideration of representations and passing of reasoned orders. Respondents argued that transfers were made in public interest and as per policy.

Ratio Decidendi

Administrative authorities must comply with the policy laid down in Government Resolutions and pass reasoned orders on representations before effecting transfers. Failure to do so renders the transfer orders unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The respondents have not complied with the Government Resolution dated 30.06.2008. The transfer orders are quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to consider the representations of the petitioners afresh and pass reasoned orders.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 242 of 2013 challenging transfer orders. Civil Application No. 607 of 2013 and Civil Application No. 14134 of 2013 were also filed. The court heard the matter and delivered the judgment.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Application Against Decree Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act as Not Maintainable Under Section 115 CPC. Decree in suit for possession based on prior possession is not amenable to revision as no appeal lies and r...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Kerala heard criminal appeal challenging conviction under POCSO Act and IPC for rape, penetrative sexual assault, kidnapping and criminal intimidation of a child. Appeal contested the improbability of the offence having occurred at a re...