Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim Despite Invalid Driving Licence — Insurer Liable to Pay and Recover from Owner. The court applied the 'pay and recover' principle under Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, directing the insurer to pay the third party and recover from the owner due to the driver's lack of valid licence.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the widow of Hiraman Babar, who died in a vehicular accident on 24 September 2008 when an auto rickshaw hit him while he was crossing the road. The deceased was 53 years old and worked as a Peon in the Office of Tahasildar, Mulund, Mumbai, earning Rs. 11,500 per month. The claimant sought compensation of Rs. 10 lakhs. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, in M.A.C.P. No. 3229 of 2008, awarded Rs. 9,82,925 with interest at 7.5% per annum, holding the owner and insurer jointly and severally liable. The insurance company appealed, arguing that the driver did not have a valid driving licence at the time of the accident, and thus the insurer should not be liable. The High Court examined the evidence, including the driving licence record from the Regional Transport Office, which showed that the licence was issued after the accident date. The court noted that the driver had no valid licence on the accident date, which is a breach of policy conditions. However, following the principle of 'pay and recover' established in Supreme Court precedents, the court held that the insurer is liable to pay compensation to the third party claimant and can recover the amount from the owner. The appeal was dismissed, and the insurer was directed to pay the awarded amount and then recover it from the owner in the same proceedings.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Third Party Rights - Pay and Recover - Section 166, Section 149 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The issue was whether the insurer is liable to pay compensation to a third party when the driver had no valid driving licence. The court held that the insurer is liable to pay compensation to the third party and can recover the amount from the owner of the vehicle, following the principle of 'pay and recover' laid down in various Supreme Court judgments. (Paras 1-10)

B) Motor Accident Claims - Driving Licence - Invalid Licence - Breach of Policy Condition - Section 149(2)(a)(ii) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The court found that the driver did not possess a valid driving licence at the time of the accident, which is a breach of policy conditions. However, the insurer is still liable to pay compensation to the third party and can recover the amount from the owner. (Paras 5-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation to a third party when the driver of the offending vehicle did not possess a valid driving licence at the time of the accident, and whether the insurer can be directed to pay and recover the amount from the owner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The insurance company is directed to pay the awarded amount to the claimant and recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle in the same proceedings.

Law Points

  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 166
  • Section 149
  • pay and recover
  • third party rights
  • driving licence validity
  • insurer's liability
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (02) 75

First Appeal No. 630 of 2014 with Civil Application No. 3597 of 2013

2018-02-24

Mrs. Mridula Bhatkar, J.

Mr. M.M. Sathaye for the Appellant, Ms. Komal Sawant i/b. Mr. A.M. Gokhale for Respondent No.1

M/s. Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Smt. Prabhavati Hiraman Babar & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Remedy Sought

The appellant insurance company sought to set aside the award of compensation on the ground that the driver did not have a valid driving licence.

Filing Reason

The insurance company challenged the Tribunal's award holding it jointly and severally liable to pay compensation despite the driver's invalid licence.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, in M.A.C.P. No. 3229 of 2008, awarded Rs. 9,82,925 with interest at 7.5% per annum, holding the owner and insurer jointly and severally liable.

Issues

Whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation to a third party when the driver of the offending vehicle did not possess a valid driving licence at the time of the accident. Whether the insurer can be directed to pay and recover the amount from the owner.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant insurance company argued that the driver did not have a valid driving licence at the time of the accident, and thus the insurer is not liable to pay compensation. The respondent claimant argued that the insurer is liable to pay compensation to the third party and can recover the amount from the owner.

Ratio Decidendi

The insurer is liable to pay compensation to a third party even if the driver had no valid driving licence, but the insurer can recover the amount from the owner of the vehicle (pay and recover principle).

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Member of the Tribunal, after considering the oral as well as documentary evidence, held opposite party and insurer jointly and severally liable to pay compensation of Rs. 9,82,925/- along with interest @ 7.5% p.a. The insurance company has challenged the judgment and award on the ground that the driver of the offending auto rickshaw did not possess a valid driving licence at the time of the accident.

Procedural History

The original claimant filed M.A.C.P. No. 3229 of 2008 under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai. The Tribunal awarded compensation on 17.09.2012. The insurance company filed First Appeal No. 630 of 2014 before the High Court of Bombay, which was heard and decided on 24.02.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166, Section 149
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Remits Pre-Partition Tenants' Claim to High Court in Land Dispute with State of Telangana. The Court held that the earlier judgment in Ramesh Parsram Malani did not examine the tenants' claim, and the High Court must decide the writ pet...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Acquits Accused Due to Doubtful Arrest and Lack of Identification. Manner of Arrest and Identification Found Unreliable – Conviction Set Aside – Appellants Acquitted.