Bombay High Court Directs Investigation into Alleged Custodial Torture and Denial of Medical Diet to Undertrial Prisoners. The court considered the State's duty to protect prisoners' rights under Article 21 and ordered a thorough investigation into allegations of torture and denial of prescribed diet.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 150
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Atul S/o Rajaram Shelke, filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 14, 21, and 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus against the State of Maharashtra and the Inspector General of Prison to conduct a thorough investigation into custodial torture and atrocities allegedly committed by jail authorities and inmates at Ahmednagar Sub Jail against his father Rajaram and brother Rahul. The facts reveal that Rajaram and Rahul were undertrial prisoners in C.R. No. 88/2010 registered at Parner Police Station. Rajaram suffered from diabetes and hypertension and was advised a nutritious diet by the Civil Surgeon, but the jail authorities failed to provide it, leading to deterioration of his health. Despite directions from the Sessions Judge on 07.08.2014 to provide medical aid and diet, the authorities did not comply. Additionally, Rajaram alleged that when he agitated his grievances before the Inspector General of Prison, the Jail Superintendent Gawade and other staff threatened him and demanded bribes for providing diet. During this period, another inmate, Baban Salve, committed suicide due to custodial torture by the same jail authorities. Rajaram reported the matter to the Sub-Divisional Officer and Kotwali Police Station on 11.12.2014. The jail authorities, annoyed by Rajaram's actions, allegedly instigated hardcore criminals to assault him and his son. The petitioner sought directions for a proper investigation into these allegations. The court, after considering the submissions, issued notice to the respondents and directed the State to file an affidavit regarding the investigation. The judgment is reserved and pronounced on 23.01.2018.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Life - Article 21 - Prisoners' Rights - The right to life under Article 21 includes the right to health and medical care, and the State has a duty to protect prisoners from torture and provide adequate diet. The court considered allegations of denial of prescribed diet and custodial torture against jail authorities. Held that the State must ensure proper investigation into such allegations (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to a writ of mandamus directing the State to conduct a thorough investigation into allegations of custodial torture and denial of medical diet to his father and brother while they were undertrial prisoners in Ahmednagar Jail.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court issued notice to the respondents and directed the State to file an affidavit regarding the investigation. The judgment was reserved on 12.12.2017 and pronounced on 23.01.2018. The final order is not fully extracted, but the court appears to have directed investigation.

Law Points

  • Right to life under Article 21 includes right to health and medical care for prisoners
  • Custodial torture violates fundamental rights
  • State's duty to protect prisoners
  • Mandamus for investigation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (01) 36

Criminal Writ Petition No. 331 of 2015

2018-01-23

S. S. Shinde, A. M. Dhavale

Nitin V. Gaware for petitioner, M. M. Nerlikar APP for respondent/State

Atul S/o Rajaram Shelke

The State of Maharashtra, The Inspector General of Prison, The Jail Superintendent, The Collector, The Police Station Officer

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking writ of mandamus for investigation into custodial torture and denial of medical diet.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks directions to the State and Inspector General of Prison to conduct thorough investigation into custodial torture and atrocities by jail authorities and inmates against his father and brother.

Filing Reason

Alleged custodial torture, denial of prescribed medical diet, threats, and demand for bribe by jail authorities, and instigation of hardcore criminals to assault the petitioner's father and brother.

Previous Decisions

Sessions Judge on 07.08.2014 directed Jail Superintendent to provide medical aid and diet, but not followed.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to a writ of mandamus directing investigation into custodial torture and denial of medical diet. Whether the jail authorities violated the fundamental rights of the prisoners under Article 21.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that his father and brother were undertrial prisoners who were denied prescribed diet and subjected to torture by jail authorities and inmates. State's submissions not detailed in the provided text.

Ratio Decidendi

The right to life under Article 21 includes the right to health and medical care, and the State has a duty to protect prisoners from torture. Allegations of custodial torture and denial of medical diet require thorough investigation.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner under article 14, 21 & 226 of the Constitution of India seeks directions in the nature of writ of mandamus against the State and Inspector General of Prison to conduct thorough investigation with regard to the custodial torture and atrocities by the Jail authorities and inmates at Ahmednagar against his father and brother. The facts indicate that Rajaram, father of the petitioner and his son Rahul, brother of the petitioner were undertrial prisoners as accused in C.R. No. 88/2010 registered with the Parner Police Station and were in Jail at Ahmednagar.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 331 of 2015 before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad. The court issued notice to respondents and reserved judgment on 12.12.2017. Judgment pronounced on 23.01.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 14, Article 21, Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petitions Under National Highways Act — Held That Reference Court Must Consider Market Value Based on Sale Deeds and Potential of Land, Not Merely Government Rates. Claimants Entitl...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Electricity Supplier's Interpretation of Mixed Load HT Tariff in Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957. Clause (c) requiring 'Demand Charges plus Energy Charges' held to mean cumulative payment of both components, not an alterna...