Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in MSEDCL Office Attack Case — Suspension of Sentence Pending Appeal. Court finds prima facie case for bail based on nature of evidence and period of incarceration, suspends sentence and releases applicants on bail under Section 389 CrPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicants were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Kolhapur in Sessions Case No. 85 of 2009 for offences under sections 143, 427, 504, 506, 332, 307 read with 149 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and under Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. They filed applications for suspension of execution of sentence imposed vide judgment dated 18th September 2017 and prayed for release on bail. The incident occurred on 9th April 2009 when a small child was electrocuted, following which a group of 25-30 persons entered the office of Junior Engineer of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL). It was alleged that the applicants carried cans of kerosene and sticks and attempted to set fire to the office. The court heard the learned counsel for the applicants and the learned APP for the State, perused the record, and considered the submissions. The court found that prima facie it revealed the incident and the allegations. However, considering the nature of evidence and the period of incarceration, the court was inclined to allow the applications. The court directed that the applicants be released on bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 15,000/- with one or more sureties. The court also directed the applicants to attend the trial court once in six months until the appeal is decided and not to tamper with prosecution evidence.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Suspension of Sentence Pending Appeal - Section 389 CrPC - Bail - The court considered the nature of evidence, period of incarceration, and prima facie case for allowing suspension of sentence and release on bail pending appeal. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicants, convicted for offences including attempt to murder and rioting, are entitled to suspension of sentence and release on bail pending appeal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the applications and directed that the applicants be released on bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 15,000/- with one or more sureties. The applicants are directed to attend the trial court once in six months until the appeal is decided and not to tamper with prosecution evidence.

Law Points

  • Suspension of sentence pending appeal
  • Section 389 CrPC
  • Bail pending appeal
  • Prima facie case
  • Period of incarceration
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (10) 57

Criminal Application No. 1412 of 2017 in Criminal Appeal No. 852 of 2017, Criminal Application No. 1373 of 2017 in Criminal Appeal No. 819 of 2017, Criminal Application No. 1397 PF 2017 in Criminal Appeal No. 838 of 2017

2017-10-11

Smt. Anuja Prabhudesai

Mr. M. V. Thorat, Mr. P. H. Gaikwad, Mr. Arjun S. Pawar, Mr. S. V. Gaikwad, Mr. Shekhar Ingawale, Mr. H. J. Dedhia

Yogesh Suresh Suryavanshi, Tayyab Basir Khatik, Shivajirao Mahadev Awale & Ors.

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal applications for suspension of sentence and release on bail pending appeal against conviction.

Remedy Sought

Applicants sought suspension of execution of sentence imposed vide judgment dated 18th September 2017 and release on bail.

Filing Reason

Applicants were convicted by Sessions Judge, Kolhapur for offences under IPC and PDPP Act and sought bail pending appeal.

Previous Decisions

Sessions Judge, Kolhapur convicted the applicants in Sessions Case No. 85 of 2009 on 18th September 2017.

Issues

Whether the applicants are entitled to suspension of sentence and release on bail pending appeal under Section 389 CrPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Learned counsel for the applicants argued for suspension of sentence and bail. Learned APP for the State opposed the applications.

Ratio Decidendi

Considering the nature of evidence and the period of incarceration, the court found it a fit case to suspend the sentence and release the applicants on bail pending appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

Prima facie it reveals that on 9th April, 2009 one small child was electrocuted. Considering the nature of evidence and the period of incarceration, this Court is inclined to allow the applications.

Procedural History

The applicants were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Kolhapur in Sessions Case No. 85 of 2009 on 18th September 2017. They filed criminal applications for suspension of sentence and bail pending appeal before the Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 143, 427, 504, 506, 332, 307, 149, 120B
  • Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984: 3
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 389
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in MSEDCL Office Attack Case — Suspension of Sentence Pending Appeal. Court finds prima facie case for bail based on nature of evidence and period of incarceration, suspends sentence and releases applicants ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Evidence and Motive Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 Read with 34 IPC for Strangulation of Husband in Hotel Room.