Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC for Single Stick Blow During Land Dispute. Accused's Act of Striking Deceased on Head with Stick During Sudden Quarrel Over Boundary Trees Held to be Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Laldas s/o Ganpatrao Katole, was convicted by the 3rd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Sessions Trial No.86/2001 for the offence punishable under Section 304 Part-II of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to four years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.2000. The incident occurred on 13.5.2000 at about 11:00 am when the deceased Shivram was cutting branches of a babool tree on the dhura (boundary) between his field and that of the accused. The accused objected, leading to a quarrel, during which the accused gave a single blow with a stick on Shivram's head. Shivram fell down, sustained a bleeding injury, and was taken to the hospital where he was declared dead. The accused himself lodged a report at Jalalkheda Police Station confessing his guilt. The prosecution relied on the testimony of PW1 Dr. Ravindra Ade (Medical Officer), PW6 Sheela (daughter-in-law of deceased), PW9 Rajnarayan Mishra (Investigating Officer), and PW10 Namdeo Ingole (Investigating Officer). The trial court convicted the accused under Section 304 Part-II IPC. On appeal, the High Court considered the nature of the injury and the circumstances. The medical evidence showed a fracture of the skull and intracranial hemorrhage, indicating that the blow was on a vital part. However, the court noted that there was no premeditation, the quarrel was sudden, and only one blow was given. The court held that the act was done with the knowledge that it was likely to cause death but without intention to cause death, thus falling under Section 304 Part-II IPC. The conviction was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Culpable Homicide not amounting to murder - Section 304 Part-II Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Single blow on head with stick during sudden quarrel - Accused and deceased were adjoining landholders with enmity over boundary and babool trees - Accused objected to deceased cutting tree branches, quarrel ensued, accused gave one stick blow on head causing death - Medical evidence showed fracture of skull and intracranial hemorrhage - Held that the act was done with knowledge that it was likely to cause death but without intention to cause death, as there was no premeditation and only one blow was given - Conviction under Section 304 Part-II upheld (Paras 2, 7-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction under Section 304 Part-II IPC is sustainable based on the evidence of a single stick blow to the head during a sudden quarrel over land boundary.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction under Section 304 Part-II IPC upheld. Sentence of four years RI and fine of Rs.2000 confirmed.

Law Points

  • Culpable homicide not amounting to murder
  • Section 304 Part-II IPC
  • Single blow
  • Knowledge of likely death
  • No intention to cause death
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (09) 177

Criminal Appeal No. 665/2003

2017-09-20

Mrs. Swapna Joshi

Shri N D Khamborkar (for appellant), Mr. N.H. Joshi (Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent)

Laldas s/o Ganpatrao Katole

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Section 304 Part-II IPC.

Filing Reason

Appellant aggrieved by judgment and order dated 07.11.2003 in Sessions Trial No.86/2001 convicting him under Section 304 Part-II IPC.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 304 Part-II IPC and sentenced to four years RI and fine of Rs.2000.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 304 Part-II IPC is sustainable on the evidence of a single stick blow to the head during a sudden quarrel.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the conviction under Section 304 Part-II is not sustainable as the act was not done with knowledge of likely death. Prosecution argued that the medical evidence shows the blow was on a vital part, indicating knowledge of likely death.

Ratio Decidendi

A single blow on the head with a stick during a sudden quarrel, without premeditation, amounts to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part-II IPC, as the accused had knowledge that such an act was likely to cause death but no intention to cause death.

Judgment Excerpts

The accused gave a blow of stick on the head of Shivram, as a result, he fell down and sustained bleeding injury on his head. The medical evidence shows that there was fracture of skull and intracranial hemorrhage, indicating that the blow was on a vital part. There was no premeditation, the quarrel was sudden, and only one blow was given. The act was done with knowledge that it was likely to cause death but without intention to cause death.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the 3rd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, on 07.11.2003 in Sessions Trial No.86/2001 under Section 304 Part-II IPC. He appealed to the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur, which heard the appeal and delivered judgment on 20.09.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 304 Part-II, 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Teacher's Salary Claim Due to Unapproved Appointment. Appointment of Assistant Teacher in Backlog Vacancy Not Approved by Education Officer; Salary Withheld as Appointment Was Not in Accordance with Maharashtra Employees o...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Forest Development Corporation in Turnkey Plantation Income Tax Case — Income from Turnkey Plantation Contract Held Not Agricultural Income Under Section 2(1A) of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the spli...