Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer of Government Pleaders from Aurangabad to Mumbai — Transfer Order Upheld as Administrative Decision Not Subject to Judicial Review in Absence of Malafides.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 71
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, four government pleaders working at the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Aurangabad, filed a writ petition challenging their transfer to Mumbai. They argued that the transfer was arbitrary, malafide, and passed without giving them an opportunity of being heard. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and the Law & Judiciary Department, defended the transfer as an administrative decision taken in public interest. The court, after hearing both sides, dismissed the petition, holding that the transfer of government pleaders is an administrative decision and not subject to judicial review unless malafides or violation of statutory rules is established. The court noted that the petitioners hold office during the pleasure of the government and have no right to be posted at a particular place. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Transfer of Government Pleaders - Administrative Decision - The transfer of government pleaders is an administrative decision and not subject to judicial review unless malafides or violation of statutory rules is established. The court held that the petitioners, being government pleaders, hold office during the pleasure of the government and have no right to be posted at a particular place. (Paras 1-5)

B) Service Law - Right to be Heard - Transfer - The petitioners contended that they were not heard before the transfer order was passed. The court held that since the transfer is an administrative decision, no prior hearing is required unless the rules specifically provide for it. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer of government pleaders from Aurangabad to Mumbai is valid and whether the petitioners have a right to be heard before transfer.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition dismissed. Transfer order upheld. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Transfer of government pleaders is an administrative decision
  • not subject to judicial review unless malafides or violation of statutory rules is established
  • Government pleaders hold office during pleasure of the government
  • No right to be posted at a particular place
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (09) 5

Writ Petition No. 00972 of 2017

2017-09-26

R.M. Borde

Mr. N.B. Khandare for petitioners, Mr. A.B. Girase, Government Pleader for respondents

Dnyanoba Tukaram Devne, Sham Babarao Patil, Shaligram Bhiwsanrao Pawar, Syed Asif Ali Syed Turab Ali

The State of Maharashtra, The Joint Secretary, Law & Judiciary Department, The Secretary, Finance Department, Chief Presenting Officer, Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging transfer order of government pleaders

Remedy Sought

Quashing of transfer order and direction to allow petitioners to continue at Aurangabad

Filing Reason

Petitioners were transferred from Aurangabad to Mumbai without being heard

Issues

Whether the transfer of government pleaders is valid Whether the petitioners have a right to be heard before transfer

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that transfer was arbitrary, malafide, and without hearing Respondents argued that transfer is an administrative decision in public interest

Ratio Decidendi

Transfer of government pleaders is an administrative decision and not subject to judicial review unless malafides or violation of statutory rules is established. Government pleaders hold office during the pleasure of the government and have no right to be posted at a particular place.

Judgment Excerpts

The transfer of government pleaders is an administrative decision and not subject to judicial review unless malafides or violation of statutory rules is established. The petitioners, being government pleaders, hold office during the pleasure of the government and have no right to be posted at a particular place.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Teacher Termination Case Due to Management's Contradictory Stand and Failure to Produce Records. The Court set aside the School Tribunal's order dismissing the appeal and remanded the matter for fresh conside...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Ferry Toll Lessee Convicted Under Bengal Ferries Act for Unauthorised Toll Collection. Section 24 of Bengal Ferries Act, 1885 Applied to Demands Made on Pretext of Toll from Persons Not Using Ferry and in Excess of L...