Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Hostile Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 498A and 306 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declaration Lacked Medical Certification and Corroboration.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 83
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Sou. Shantabai w/o Supada Bochare, was convicted by the 1st Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon in Sessions Case No. 74/1997 for offences punishable under Sections 498A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. She was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three months and a fine of Rs.5000 for each offence, with the sentences to run concurrently. The appellant appealed against this judgment and order dated 08.01.2002. The case arose from the death of the appellant's daughter-in-law due to burn injuries. The prosecution's case was based entirely on a dying declaration (Exh.30) recorded by an Executive Magistrate. However, all four material witnesses examined by the prosecution turned hostile. The deceased's 13-year-old son (P.W.1) stated that his mother's sari caught fire accidentally while she was preparing tea. The deceased's brother (P.W.2) testified that the deceased had no grievance against the appellant and told him the burns were accidental. Neighbours (P.W.3 and P.W.4) stated that the relationship between the deceased and the appellant was cordial and that they saw the deceased running while burning and helped douse the fire. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor fairly conceded that the prosecution case hinged solely on the dying declaration. The court noted that the dying declaration did not contain a certification from a doctor that the deceased was in a fit state of mind to make the statement. In the absence of such certification and corroboration, the dying declaration was unreliable. The court held that when all witnesses turn hostile and the dying declaration is not trustworthy, the prosecution case fails. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction and sentence, and acquitted the appellant of all charges.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Dying Declaration - Evidentiary Value - Sections 498A and 306 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The prosecution case hinged solely on the dying declaration Exh.30, as all four material witnesses turned hostile and did not support the prosecution. The dying declaration was recorded by an Executive Magistrate but did not contain a certification from a doctor that the deceased was in a fit state of mind to make the statement. The court held that in the absence of such certification and corroboration, the dying declaration cannot be the sole basis for conviction. (Paras 3-5)

B) Criminal Law - Hostile Witnesses - Effect on Prosecution Case - Sections 498A and 306 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The son of the deceased (P.W.1), brother (P.W.2), and neighbours (P.W.3 and P.W.4) all turned hostile and stated that the deceased's burns were accidental while preparing tea. The court held that when all witnesses turn hostile and the dying declaration is unreliable, the prosecution case fails. (Paras 3-4)

C) Criminal Law - Abetment of Suicide - Ingredients - Section 306 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - To convict under Section 306, there must be proof of abetment as defined under Section 107 IPC. In the absence of any evidence of instigation or intentional aid, and with witnesses stating the relationship was cordial, the conviction under Section 306 cannot be sustained. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Sections 498A and 306 IPC can be sustained solely on the basis of a dying declaration when all material witnesses have turned hostile and the dying declaration lacks certification of the deceased's consciousness.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The judgment and order dated 08.01.2002 passed by the 1st Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon in Sessions Case No.74/1997 is set aside. The appellant is acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code. The bail bonds stand cancelled.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration must be corroborated when witnesses turn hostile
  • Dying declaration recorded without certification of consciousness is unreliable
  • Conviction under Section 306 IPC requires proof of abetment
  • Hostile witnesses cannot be the sole basis for conviction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (08) 159

Criminal Appeal No.219 of 2002

2017-08-23

Rohit B. Deo, J.

Shri H.R. Dhumale, APP for Respondent/State

Sou. Shantabai w/o Supada Bochare

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for offences under Sections 498A and 306 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for allegedly subjecting her daughter-in-law to cruelty and abetting her suicide by burn injuries.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted the appellant on 08.01.2002 in Sessions Case No.74/1997.

Issues

Whether the dying declaration Exh.30 is reliable and sufficient to sustain the conviction when all material witnesses have turned hostile. Whether the conviction under Section 306 IPC can be sustained without proof of abetment.

Submissions/Arguments

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the prosecution case hinges solely on the dying declaration Exh.30, as all four material witnesses turned hostile. The prosecution argued that the dying declaration should be relied upon despite lack of corroboration.

Ratio Decidendi

A dying declaration which is not certified by a medical officer as to the fitness of the declarant's state of mind cannot be the sole basis for conviction, especially when all material witnesses have turned hostile and the dying declaration is not corroborated. The prosecution must prove abetment under Section 107 IPC for a conviction under Section 306 IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, in all fairness, would urge that the case of the prosecution hinges only on the dying declaration Exh.30. The son of the deceased, who was aged 13 when the evidence was recorded, categorically states in the examination-in-chief that his mother was preparing tea and accidentally her sari caught fire. The dying declaration Exh.30 is recorded by Mr. Dattatray Aatmaram Joshi, the Executive Magistrate, however, the dying declaration does not bear the certification of the doctor that the deceased was in a fit state of mind to make the statement.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the 1st Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon on 08.01.2002 in Sessions Case No.74/1997. The appellant filed Criminal Appeal No.219 of 2002 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which was heard and decided on 23.08.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 498A, 306
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ of Quo Warranto Against Electricity Ombudsman for Lack of Standing. Petitioner failed to establish that the appointment of respondent no.2 was illegal or that he had a superior right to the post under the Electricity ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati Dismisses Contempt Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 20 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Petition Alleging Willful Disobedience of Writ Order Dismissed on Ground That Contempt Proceedings Must Be Initiate...