Bombay High Court Quashes Second FIR in Criminal Breach of Trust Case — Proceedings Based on Same Facts as Earlier FIR Amount to Abuse of Process of Law. Second FIR on Identical Allegations by Co-Accused Not Maintainable Under Section 482 CrPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Pawan Lodha, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of Regular Criminal Case No.173/2015 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, 6th Court, Dhule, arising out of C.R. No.1/2015 registered at Mohadinagar Police Station, Dhule on 6th January 2015 for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that the proceedings were based on a second FIR on the same facts as an earlier FIR. The first FIR was lodged by Sadanand Suvarna on 20th December 2014 at M.I.D.C. Police Station, Andheri under Section 420 read with Section 34 IPC against the petitioner and two others, including Ashok Singh Gorad (respondent no.2 herein). The first FIR pertained to a transaction where the petitioner and another person allegedly induced Ashok Singh to divert a RTGS payment of Rs.17 lakhs to companies suggested by them instead of the intended recipient. The second FIR was lodged by Ashok Singh Gorad on 6th January 2015 at Mohadinagar Police Station, Dhule, making similar allegations against the petitioner. The court examined the facts and found that the second FIR was based on the same set of facts as the first FIR. The court held that a second FIR on the same facts is not maintainable and amounts to an abuse of the process of law. Consequently, the court allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings in Regular Criminal Case No.173/2015 and the FIR C.R. No.1/2015.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Second FIR - Quashing - Section 482 CrPC - Second FIR on same facts is not maintainable and amounts to abuse of process of law - The court held that when a first FIR is already registered on the same set of facts, a second FIR cannot be allowed to proceed, and the proceedings based on the second FIR are liable to be quashed (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a second FIR based on the same set of facts as the first FIR is maintainable and whether the proceedings arising from such second FIR should be quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The proceedings in Regular Criminal Case No.173/2015 on the file of Judicial Magistrate, 6th Court, Dhule arising out of C.R. No.1/2015 registered at Mohadinagar Police Station, Dhule are quashed and set aside.

Law Points

  • Second FIR on same facts is not maintainable
  • abuse of process of law
  • quashing under Section 482 CrPC
  • criminal breach of trust
  • cheating
  • forgery
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (07) 58

Criminal Writ Petition No.1388 of 2015

2017-07-04

R.M. Borde, A.M. Dhavale

Mr S.B. Narwade, Mr N.K. Singh, Mr K.D. Mundhe, Mr A.K. Bhosale

Pawan s/o Ranjithmal Lodha

The State of Maharashtra and Ashok Singh Poonam Singh Gorad

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of criminal proceedings based on second FIR.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of Regular Criminal Case No.173/2015 and FIR C.R. No.1/2015.

Filing Reason

The petitioner contended that the proceedings were based on a second FIR on the same facts as an earlier FIR, which is not maintainable.

Previous Decisions

First FIR was lodged on 20th December 2014 at M.I.D.C. Police Station, Andheri under Section 420 read with Section 34 IPC against the petitioner and two others, including Ashok Singh Gorad.

Issues

Whether a second FIR on the same facts is maintainable. Whether the proceedings based on the second FIR should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the second FIR is based on the same facts as the first FIR and hence is not maintainable. The respondent State opposed the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

A second FIR on the same set of facts as the first FIR is not maintainable and amounts to an abuse of the process of law. Such proceedings are liable to be quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Judgment Excerpts

The argument advanced for quashing of the proceedings is that the proceedings are based on second F.I.R. on same facts. The first F.I.R. was lodged by Sadanand Suvarna on 20th December 2014 at M.I.D.C. Police Station, Andheri under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code against the applicant Pawan Lodha and two others.

Procedural History

First FIR lodged on 20.12.2014 at M.I.D.C. Police Station, Andheri. Second FIR lodged on 06.01.2015 at Mohadinagar Police Station, Dhule. Petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No.1388/2015 under Section 482 CrPC for quashing. Judgment reserved on 07.06.2017 and pronounced on 04.07.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Violation of Natural Justice. Demolition Order Set Aside as Issued Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing, Despite Alleged Unauthorized Construction in Heritage Precinct.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Second FIR in Criminal Breach of Trust Case — Proceedings Based on Same Facts as Earlier FIR Amount to Abuse of Process of Law. Second FIR on Identical Allegations by Co-Accused Not Maintainable Under Section 482 CrPC.