Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Order Quashing Reversion of Head Mistress. Inquiry Conducted Without Following Statutory Procedure Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977 Renders Reversion Invalid.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, the Superintendent of Nanded Sikh Gurudwara Sachkhand and the Head Master of Khalsa High School, challenged the judgment of the School Tribunal dated 28 August 2015. The Tribunal had partly allowed the appeal of Respondent No.1, Jyotinder Kaur Hira Singh, who was the Head Mistress of the school. She was promoted to the post of Head Mistress on 23 August 2008, and her appointment was approved by the Education Department. In 2012, during the preparation of SSC examination forms, a clerk named Mr. Pund entered wrong subject codes in some forms. The management issued a charge sheet to the Head Mistress and after an inquiry, passed a reversion order on 4 March 2013, reverting her to the post of Assistant Teacher. The Head Mistress appealed to the School Tribunal, which quashed the reversion order and directed the management to conduct a fresh inquiry as per rules, and in the meantime, reinstate her as Head Mistress. The management conceded that the school is a private school covered by the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977 and Rules, 1981. The High Court, after hearing both sides, upheld the Tribunal's order, finding that the inquiry was not conducted in accordance with the statutory provisions. The court noted that the management had given up the objection regarding the applicability of the Gurudwara Act, 1956. The decision was that the writ petition was dismissed, and the Tribunal's order was confirmed.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Reversion - Inquiry Procedure - Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977, Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules, 1981 - The management reverted the Head Mistress without conducting a proper inquiry as per the Act and Rules. The School Tribunal quashed the reversion and directed reinstatement with a fresh inquiry. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's order, holding that the inquiry was vitiated due to non-compliance with statutory requirements. (Paras 2-6)

B) Service Law - Jurisdiction of School Tribunal - Appeal against reversion - Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977, Section 9 - The School Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against an order of reversion passed by the management. The Tribunal's order directing reinstatement pending fresh inquiry was within its powers. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reversion of the Head Mistress from her post was validly ordered after a proper inquiry as per the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977 and Rules, 1981.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed. The judgment of the School Tribunal dated 28 August 2015 is upheld.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Inquiry procedure
  • Reversion
  • Private school employee
  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act
  • 1977
  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules
  • 1981
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (07) 15

WRIT PETITION NO. 8978 OF 2016

2017-07-18

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

Mr. P.P. Mandlik for petitioner, Mr. A.V. Patil Indrale for Respondent No.1, Mr. N.T. Bhagat, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2

The Superintendent, The Nanded Sikh Gurudwra Sachkhand Shri Hazur Apchal Nagar Nagar Sahib, Nanded and The Head Master, Khalsa High School, Bafna Road, Nanded

Jyotinder Kaur Hira Singh and The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Nanded

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the judgment of the School Tribunal which quashed the reversion order of the Head Mistress and directed reinstatement with fresh inquiry.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners (management) sought to set aside the School Tribunal's order dated 28 August 2015.

Filing Reason

The management was aggrieved by the Tribunal's order quashing the reversion of the Head Mistress and directing her reinstatement.

Previous Decisions

The School Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the Head Mistress, quashed the reversion order dated 04.03.2013, directed fresh inquiry, and ordered reinstatement on the original post of Head Mistress pending the outcome of the fresh inquiry.

Issues

Whether the reversion order was passed after a proper inquiry as per the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977 and Rules, 1981. Whether the School Tribunal had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and pass the impugned order.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners conceded that the school is a private school covered by the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977 and Rules, 1981, and gave up the objection regarding the Gurudwara Act, 1956. The respondent Head Mistress argued that the inquiry was not conducted in accordance with the statutory provisions.

Ratio Decidendi

The reversion of an employee in a private school must be preceded by a proper inquiry conducted in accordance with the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977 and the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules, 1981. Failure to comply with the statutory inquiry procedure renders the reversion order invalid, and the School Tribunal has the power to quash such order and direct reinstatement pending a fresh inquiry.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner management is aggrieved by the judgment of the School Tribunal dated 28th August, 2015 by which Appeal No. 23 of 2013 filed by her for challenging the punishment of reversion dated 04th March, 2013 has been quashed and set aside and she has been granted reinstatement on the original post of Head Mistress. The petitioners make a statement that they are giving up the objection as regards the Gurudwara Act, 1956 being applicable and concede that the Petitioner No.2 – school is a private school and is covered by the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977 and the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules, 1981.

Procedural History

The Head Mistress was promoted on 23 August 2008. In 2012, wrong subject codes were entered in SSC forms by a clerk. The management issued a charge sheet and after an inquiry, passed a reversion order on 4 March 2013. The Head Mistress filed Appeal No. 23 of 2013 before the School Tribunal, which partly allowed the appeal on 28 August 2015, quashing the reversion and directing reinstatement with a fresh inquiry. The management filed the present writ petition on 2016, which was dismissed on 18 July 2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977:
  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules, 1981:
  • Gurudwara Act, 1956:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Impleadment of Subsequent Purchasers in Partition Appeal. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC allows joinder of parties whose presence is necessary for effective adjudication, even if purchase is during pendency of litigation...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Sale Deed by Father Not Binding on Sons as Legal Necessity Not Proved. Court sets aside concurrent findings of courts below, holding that burden to prove legal necessity for sale by fathe...