Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Undertrial Prisoner to Parent Jail for Convenience of Trial and Family Access. Transfer of undertrial prisoner without hearing is permissible as administrative act, but court directs transfer to Aurangabad Central Jail considering residence and trial location.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sayyad Jahir @ Shera Bakar Kureshi, an undertrial prisoner facing charges under Sections 302, 364, 201, 120(B), 143, 147, 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(1)(i), 3(1)(ii), 3(2), 3(4) of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 (MCOC Act), was arrested on 26.04.2012 in connection with Crime No. I21/2012. He was initially lodged at Central Prison, Aurangabad, and a chargesheet was filed in Special Case No. 21/2012 pending before the Special Judge (MCOC Act) at Aurangabad. The petitioner, a resident of Aurangabad with all his relations staying there, challenged his transfer from Aurangabad Central Jail to Nashik Central Jail without any reason or opportunity of being heard. The court noted that the transfer of an undertrial prisoner is an administrative act and does not require a prior hearing. However, considering that the petitioner's trial was pending at Aurangabad and his family resided there, the court directed his transfer back to Aurangabad Central Jail for the convenience of the trial and to facilitate family access. The petition was disposed of with the direction to the respondents to transfer the petitioner to Aurangabad Central Jail within two weeks.

Headnote

A) Prison Law - Transfer of Undertrial Prisoner - Administrative Discretion - The transfer of an undertrial prisoner from one jail to another is an administrative act and does not require a prior hearing, but the court can direct transfer to the parent jail for convenience of trial and family access - Held that the petitioner's transfer to Nashik was not illegal, but considering his residence and trial location at Aurangabad, he should be transferred back to Aurangabad Central Jail (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer of an undertrial prisoner from Aurangabad Central Jail to Nashik Central Jail without assigning reasons or providing an opportunity of hearing is illegal and violative of his rights.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is disposed of. The respondents are directed to transfer the petitioner from Nashik Central Jail to Aurangabad Central Jail within two weeks from the date of the order.

Law Points

  • Transfer of undertrial prisoner without hearing is permissible under administrative discretion
  • but court can direct transfer to parent jail for convenience of trial and family access
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (06) 107

Criminal Writ Petition No. 642 of 2017

2017-06-12

R. M. Borde, A. M. Dhavale

Mr D. S. Manorkar (for petitioner), Mr K. S. Patil (APP for respondents/State)

Sayyad Jahir @ Shera Bakar Kureshi

The State of Maharashtra, Inspector General of Prisons, Superintendent of Jail, Central Jail at Aurangabad, Superintendent of Jail, Central Jail at Nashik

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition challenging transfer of undertrial prisoner from one jail to another without reason or hearing.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to be transferred back to Aurangabad Central Jail from Nashik Central Jail.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was transferred from Aurangabad Central Jail to Nashik Central Jail without any reason or opportunity of being heard.

Issues

Whether the transfer of an undertrial prisoner without assigning reasons or providing an opportunity of hearing is illegal.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that his transfer from Aurangabad to Nashik was without reason and without hearing, causing hardship as his family and trial are at Aurangabad. Respondents/State argued that the transfer is an administrative act and does not require a hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The transfer of an undertrial prisoner from one jail to another is an administrative act and does not require a prior hearing. However, considering the convenience of the trial and the prisoner's family, the court can direct transfer to the parent jail.

Judgment Excerpts

The transfer of an undertrial prisoner from one jail to another is an administrative act and does not require a prior hearing. Considering the convenience of the trial and the petitioner's family, we direct the respondents to transfer the petitioner to Aurangabad Central Jail.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging his transfer from Aurangabad Central Jail to Nashik Central Jail. The court heard the matter and disposed it with directions.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 364, 201, 120(B), 143, 147, 149
  • Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999: 3(1)(i), 3(1)(ii), 3(2), 3(4)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 417 IPC for Cheating Upheld Based on False Promise of Marriage.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Undertrial Prisoner to Parent Jail for Convenience of Trial and Family Access. Transfer of undertrial prisoner without hearing is permissible as administrative act, but court directs transfer to Aurangabad Central...