High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Writ Petition for Starting Architecture College - Directions Issued to Consider Application for No Objection Certificate. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's application for starting a college of architecture and decide it in accordance with law within four weeks.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Jijamata Shikshan Prasarak Mandal's Kamlatai College of Architecture, through its President Dr. Pramod Uttamrao Shinde, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad seeking directions to the respondents to consider its application for starting a college of architecture at Madadgaon Takli Kazi, Tq. & Dist. Ahmednagar. The respondents included the State of Maharashtra, Director of Technical Education, All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), and Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technical University. The petitioner had applied for a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the State Government and affiliation from the University. The court, after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, observed that the issue involved was of starting a college of architecture. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's application and decide it in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of the order. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions. The judgment was delivered by a division bench comprising Justice Anoop V. Mohta and Justice Sunil K. Kotwal on 21 June 2017.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Technical Education - Starting of Architecture College - AICTE Regulations - The petitioner, a trust, sought to start a college of architecture and applied for NOC from the State Government and affiliation from the University. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's application and decide it in accordance with law within a stipulated time frame, as the issue involved was of starting a college of architecture. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction to the respondents to consider its application for starting a college of architecture and to grant necessary approvals including No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the State Government and affiliation from the University.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's application and decide it in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of the order. Rule made returnable forthwith.

Law Points

  • Education Law
  • Technical Education
  • All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) Regulations
  • University Affiliation
  • No Objection Certificate (NOC)
  • Writ Jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (06) 75

Writ Petition No.7706/2017

2017-06-21

Anoop V. Mohta, Sunil K. Kotwal

Shri D.S. Bagul for petitioner, Shri A.V. Deshmukh AGP for respondent nos.1 & 2, Shri S.V. Advant for respondent no.3, Shri A.R. Borulkar for respondent no.4

Jijamata Shikshan Prasarak Mandal's, Kamlatai College of Architecture, Through its President Shri Dr.Pramod Uttamrao Shinde

1] The State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary for Higher and Technical Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2] Director of Technical Education, 3, Mahapalika Marg, Maharashtra State, Mumbai. 3] All India Council for Technical Education, 7th Floor, Chandralok Building, Janpath, New Delhi. Through its Member Secretary. 4] Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar Technical University, Through its Registrar, Lonere, Taluka Mapan, Dist.Raigadh.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking directions to respondents to consider application for starting a college of architecture and grant necessary approvals.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to consider the petitioner's application for starting a college of architecture and to grant No Objection Certificate and affiliation.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's application for starting a college of architecture was not being considered by the respondents.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction to the respondents to consider its application for starting a college of architecture and to grant necessary approvals including No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the State Government and affiliation from the University.

Submissions/Arguments

Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the application for starting the college of architecture should be considered by the respondents. Respondents' counsel did not oppose the direction for consideration of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's application for starting a college of architecture and decide it in accordance with law within a stipulated time frame, as the issue involved was of starting a college of architecture.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard learned counsel appearing for parties. As the issue involved here is of starting college of Architecture at Madadgaon Takli Kazi Tq. & Dist.Ahmednagar. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent, petition is taken for final hearing and disposal.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.7706/2017 before the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad. The court heard the learned counsel for the parties and disposed of the petition with directions.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Quashes Appointment of Court Commissioner in Civil Suit — Violation of Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Application Filed After Trial Commenced Without Leave of Court
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Tenant to File Written Statement in Eviction Case Despite Delay Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Section 43(4) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, does not bar acceptance of written statement if delay is condoned with c...