Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Non-Consideration of Inter-District Transfer of Assistant Teacher. Petitioner directed to approach Divisional Commissioner after receipt of transfer order.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 20
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dattatraya Lalji Chormale, an Assistant Teacher working in Zilla Parishad, Jalna, filed a writ petition challenging the action of Respondent No.1 (State of Maharashtra) for not considering his claim for inter-district transfer while allegedly considering the case of a junior employee. The petitioner had applied online for inter-district transfer based on the Government Resolution dated 27th February 2017 and subsequent amendments. He made a representation but it was not taken note of. The Court, after hearing the petitioner's counsel, noted that the State Government is required to consider individual cases based on the transfer policy. The Court observed that after receipt of a transfer order, the petitioner is entitled to agitate the issue by representation/appeal before the Divisional Commissioner, who is the authority to deal with inter-district transfer issues. The Court disposed of the petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Divisional Commissioner after receipt of the transfer order. The petition was dismissed, rule discharged, and no costs were awarded.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Transfer - Inter-district Transfer - Government Resolution dated 27th February 2017 - Petitioner, an Assistant Teacher, challenged non-consideration of his online application for inter-district transfer and alleged that a junior employee's transfer was considered. The Court held that the State Government must consider individual cases based on the transfer policy and that the petitioner, after receipt of transfer order, may approach the Divisional Commissioner by way of representation/appeal. The petition was dismissed with liberty to approach the Divisional Commissioner. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner's claim for inter-district transfer was wrongly not considered and whether the case of a junior employee was preferred over the petitioner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition dismissed. Rule discharged. No costs. Petitioner granted liberty to approach the Divisional Commissioner after receipt of transfer order.

Law Points

  • Transfer policy
  • Government Resolution dated 27th February 2017
  • Inter-district transfer
  • Representation to Divisional Commissioner
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (06) 66

WRIT PETITION NO. 8269 OF 2017

2017-06-30

ANOOP V. MOHTA, SUNIL K. KOTWAL

Mr. S.D. Joshi for petitioner, Mr. M.B. Bharaswadkar, A.G.P. for respondent State

Dattatraya Lalji Chormale

State of Maharashtra, The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Jalna

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging non-consideration of inter-district transfer claim.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought consideration of his claim for inter-district transfer.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's claim for inter-district transfer was not considered while a junior employee's case was considered.

Issues

Whether the petitioner's claim for inter-district transfer was wrongly not considered. Whether the case of a junior employee was preferred over the petitioner.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that his claim for inter-district transfer was not considered and a junior employee's transfer was considered. Petitioner made a representation which was not taken note of. Petitioner argued that his case is not covered by Writ Petition No. 6640 of 2017.

Ratio Decidendi

The State Government must consider individual cases based on the transfer policy. After receipt of transfer order, the petitioner may approach the Divisional Commissioner by representation/appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner by this petition challenging the action of Respondent No.1 whereby as stated the claim of petitioner for inter-district transfer not considered and the case of junior employee for interdistrict transfer has been considered. Therefore, by keeping all points open, present petition is disposed of with liberty to approach to the Divisional Commissioner after the receipt of the transfer order.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed writ petition challenging non-consideration of inter-district transfer. Heard counsel. Petition disposed of with liberty to approach Divisional Commissioner.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Non-Consideration of Inter-District Transfer of Assistant Teacher. Petitioner directed to approach Divisional Commissioner after receipt of transfer order.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging DGFT Communication on Duty Free Replenishment Certificates — SION Applicable as on Date of Export. The court quashed orders demanding duty and penalty for imports under DFRC based on subsequent SIO...