Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Furlough to Life Convict in Rape Case Despite Police Objection — Emphasizes Right to Furlough as a Reformative Tool. The court held that a prisoner who has never availed furlough or parole is entitled to furlough unless there is material evidence of likely breach of peace or absconding, and mere police apprehension is insufficient.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Basuraj Kattimani, was a life convict serving sentence at Central Jail Colvale, Goa, for an offence punishable under Section 376 IPC (rape). He had completed 3.3 years of imprisonment and had never availed parole or furlough. He filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the rejection of his furlough application. The Superintendent of Police had reported that granting furlough could lead to a breach of peace in the locality and that the petitioner might take advantage of furlough and not surrender back to jail. The petitioner argued that he had a right to furlough, having never availed it before, and that the police report was based on mere apprehension without material evidence. The court, after hearing both sides, allowed the petition, holding that furlough is a right of a prisoner and cannot be denied solely on the basis of unsubstantiated apprehension. The court directed the respondents to release the petitioner on furlough for a period of 14 days on such terms and conditions as the jail authorities may deem fit, including furnishing a personal bond and surety. The judgment emphasized the reformative purpose of furlough and the need to maintain family ties.

Headnote

A) Prison Law - Furlough - Right of Prisoner - Furlough is a right of a prisoner, not a privilege, and is granted for maintaining family and social ties, subject to good conduct - The court held that the petitioner, who had completed 3.3 years of life imprisonment and had never availed parole or furlough, was entitled to furlough despite police objection based on apprehension of breach of peace, as there was no material to support such apprehension (Paras 4-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, a life convict under Section 376 IPC, is entitled to furlough despite the police report apprehending breach of peace and possibility of absconding.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to release the petitioner on furlough for a period of 14 days on such terms and conditions as the jail authorities may deem fit, including furnishing a personal bond and surety.

Law Points

  • Furlough is a right of a prisoner
  • not a privilege
  • subject to good conduct
  • Furlough cannot be denied solely on apprehension of breach of peace without material evidence
  • Prisoner who never availed furlough or parole should be considered for furlough
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (04) 167

Criminal Writ Petition No.64 of 2017

2017-04-25

F. M. Reis, Nutan D. Sardessai

2017:BHC-GOA:1192-DB

T. John George for petitioner, P. Faldessai for respondents

Basuraj Kattimani

State of Goa

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition challenging rejection of furlough application

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to grant furlough

Filing Reason

Rejection of furlough application based on police report apprehending breach of peace and possibility of absconding

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to furlough despite police objection based on apprehension of breach of peace and possibility of absconding

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he had never availed parole or furlough and had completed 3.3 years of life imprisonment, and the police report was based on mere apprehension without material evidence. Respondents opposed furlough citing possibility of breach of peace and that the petitioner might not surrender back to jail.

Ratio Decidendi

Furlough is a right of a prisoner and not a privilege, and cannot be denied solely on the basis of unsubstantiated apprehension of breach of peace or absconding. A prisoner who has never availed furlough or parole is entitled to furlough unless there is material evidence to the contrary.

Judgment Excerpts

It was the case of the petitioner that he was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 376 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and completed 3.3 years. The Superintendent of Police had reported not to consider the application of the said prisoner for furlough as there was every possibility of a breach of peace in the locality and that he would take advantage of furlough and may not surrender back to Jail. He had neither availed parole nor furlough on a single occasion and therefore his application had to be granted.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the rejection of his furlough application. The petition was heard and disposed of on 25th April 2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 376
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Partnership Claim Fails for Lack of Registration. Relationship of landlord and tenant established by payment of rent and acceptance, not partnership.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Furlough to Life Convict in Rape Case Despite Police Objection — Emphasizes Right to Furlough as a Reformative Tool. The court held that a prisoner who has never availed furlough or parole is entitled to furlough unl...