Bombay High Court Allows Parole for Prisoner to Attend His Own Marriage Under Rule 324(2) of Goa Prisons Rules, 2006. The court held that a prisoner's own marriage constitutes 'sufficient cause' for grant of parole under the amended rule, directing release for 15 days.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Mrs. Cecilia Fernandes and Ms. Gayatri V. Bansode, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa seeking the release of a prisoner on parole to enable him to participate in his own marriage. The prisoner had applied to the Inspector General of Prisons (respondent no.2) as early as 1.12.2016 for parole to attend his marriage scheduled on 27.12.2016, but the application was not considered. The petitioners contended that the case fell within the ambit of 'sufficient cause' under Rule 324(2) of the Goa Prisons Rules, 2006 as amended in 2008, and that the court had the power to order release on parole. The learned Advocate for the petitioners, Shri R. Menezes, argued that the prisoner had been released several times earlier on furlough or parole and had good conduct. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Shri M. Amonkar, waived notice on behalf of the respondents. The court, after hearing both sides, found that the prisoner's marriage constituted 'sufficient cause' and directed the respondents to release the prisoner on parole for a period of 15 days, subject to usual conditions. The court also directed the respondents to consider the application expeditiously and pass appropriate orders.

Headnote

A) Prisons Law - Parole - Sufficient Cause - Marriage - Rule 324(2) of the Goa Prisons Rules, 2006 (as amended in 2008) - The court considered whether a prisoner's own marriage constitutes 'sufficient cause' for grant of parole. The court held that the prisoner's impending marriage, supported by civil registration records and an application made well in advance, falls within the ambit of 'sufficient cause' under the amended rule. The court directed the respondents to release the prisoner on parole for a period of 15 days to enable him to participate in his marriage, subject to usual conditions. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner's case falls within the ambit of 'sufficient cause' under Rule 324(2) of the Goa Prisons Rules, 2006 as amended in 2008, entitling the prisoner to be released on parole to participate in his own marriage.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the respondents to release the prisoner on parole for a period of 15 days to enable him to participate in his marriage, subject to usual conditions. The respondents were also directed to consider the application expeditiously and pass appropriate orders.

Law Points

  • Parole
  • Sufficient cause
  • Marriage
  • Rule 324(2) Goa Prisons Rules 2006
  • Amendment 2008
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (01) 138

Criminal Writ Petition No.8 of 2017

2017-01-19

F. M. Reis, Nutan D. Sardessai

Shri R. Menezes for petitioners, Shri M. Amonkar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents

Mrs. Cecilia Fernandes and Ms. Gayatri V. Bansode

Inspector General, Prisons, The Inspectorate General of Prisons, Government of Goa, Old Education Building, Panaji, Goa and Addl. Inspector General, Prisons, The Inspectorate General of Prisons, Government of Goa, Old Education Building, Panaji, Goa

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition seeking parole for a prisoner to attend his own marriage.

Remedy Sought

Release of the prisoner on parole to participate in his marriage.

Filing Reason

The prisoner's application for parole was not considered by the respondent no.2 despite being made well in advance.

Issues

Whether the prisoner's marriage constitutes 'sufficient cause' under Rule 324(2) of the Goa Prisons Rules, 2006 as amended in 2008.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that the case falls within 'sufficient cause' under the amended rule and that the prisoner had good conduct and had been released earlier on furlough or parole.

Ratio Decidendi

The prisoner's own marriage constitutes 'sufficient cause' under Rule 324(2) of the Goa Prisons Rules, 2006 as amended in 2008, entitling him to be released on parole.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Advocate for the petitioners contended that the case of the petitioners was within the ambit of 'for sufficient cause' as contained in the 2008 amendment to Rule 324(2) of the Goa Prisons Rules, 2006 and therefore this Court was well within its powers to order the release of the prisoner on parole to participate in his marriage.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Criminal Writ Petition No.8 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court at Goa. The court heard the matter on 19th January 2017 and passed the judgment on the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Goa Prisons Rules, 2006: Rule 324(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Court Dismisses Applications with Costs for Misuse of Legal Process. High Court imposes costs for frivolous complaints seeking to pressurize public servants in the Jalgaon land acquisition case.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charge-Sheet Against In-Laws in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations and Generalised Complaints. The court held that generalised complaints against all family members without specific instances con...