Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Earlier Order in Service Matter. Government Order Issued Satisfying Directions in W.P.No.15296 of 2024.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 102
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dr. S. Raja Soundara Pandian, an Associate Professor at Government College of Education, Orathanad, filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedience of an order dated 17.06.2025 passed by the Madras High Court in W.P.No.15296 of 2024. The respondent contemnor was Dr. P. Shankar, IAS, Secretary to Government, Higher Education (F2) Department. During the hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents submitted that the directions of the court had been complied with and produced G.O.(D) No.27, Higher Education (F1) Department dated 03.02.2026 as evidence of compliance. Recording this submission, the court closed the contempt petition without any further action. The judgment is brief, focusing solely on the fact of compliance and the consequent closure of proceedings.

Headnote

A) Contempt of Court - Willful Disobedience - Section 11, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Compliance with Court Order - The contempt petition alleged willful disobedience of an order dated 17.06.2025 in W.P.No.15296 of 2024. The contemnor produced G.O.(D) No.27 dated 03.02.2026 showing compliance. The court recorded the submission and closed the contempt petition, holding that compliance had been made. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the contemnor had willfully disobeyed the order dated 17.06.2025 passed in W.P.No.15296 of 2024.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The contempt petition is closed recording the submission of compliance by the respondent.

Law Points

  • Contempt of Courts Act
  • 1971
  • Section 11
  • Willful Disobedience
  • Compliance
  • Closure of Contempt Proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (02) 171

CONT P No. 82 of 2026

2026-02-05

C. Kumarappan

Mr. S.P. Sudalaiyandi (for petitioner), Mr. A. Selvendran, Special Government Pleader (for respondents)

Dr. S. Raja Soundara Pandian

Dr. P. Shankar, IAS

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Contempt petition for alleged willful disobedience of a High Court order.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought punishment of the respondent for willful disobedience of the order dated 17.06.2025 in W.P.No.15296 of 2024.

Filing Reason

Alleged non-compliance with the court order dated 17.06.2025.

Previous Decisions

Order dated 17.06.2025 in W.P.No.15296 of 2024.

Issues

Whether the contemnor willfully disobeyed the order dated 17.06.2025 in W.P.No.15296 of 2024.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued willful disobedience. Respondent submitted compliance and produced G.O.(D) No.27 dated 03.02.2026.

Ratio Decidendi

When the contemnor demonstrates compliance with the court order, the contempt petition is closed without further action.

Judgment Excerpts

Recording the above submission of the learned Special Government Pleader, this Contempt Petition is closed.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed W.P.No.15296 of 2024, which was disposed of on 17.06.2025. Alleging non-compliance, the petitioner filed CONT P No. 82 of 2026 on an unspecified date. The court heard the matter on 05.02.2026 and closed the petition upon compliance being shown.

Acts & Sections

  • Contempt of Courts Act, 1971: Section 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case. Appellants convicted under Sections 307, 324, 506 read with Section 34 IPC for attacking complainant and his family with knives and sticks, causing grievous injuries.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Applies Multiplier of 18 and Adds 40% Future Prospects for Deceased Labourer Aged 28 Years. Tribunal's award of Rs. 8,10,000 enhanced to Rs. 14,80,800 with in...