Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Encroachment from Public Property, Directs Authorities to Expedite Pending Appeal Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. The court held that the appeal under Section 10 of the Act must be decided expeditiously before any removal action.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 24
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, S. Srinivasan, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 5 (District Collector, Joint Director and Assistant Director of Animal Husbandry Department, Revenue Divisional Officer, and Tahsildar) to remove encroachments made by the 6th respondent, M. Sivakumar, in Survey No.209, Village No.62, Pethikuppam, Gummudipoondi Taluk, Thiruvallur District. The petitioner relied on a letter dated December 2020 from the 5th respondent (Tahsildar) communicated to the 3rd respondent. During the hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 5 submitted that a final notice under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 had been issued. Challenging that notice, the 6th respondent/encroacher had preferred an appeal under Section 10 of the Act before the District Collector, and the appeal was pending. An application for interim relief was also pending. In view of this, the court did not direct immediate removal but instead directed the authorities to proceed with the appeal and dispose of it as expeditiously as possible. The court further observed that if any encroachment is identified after the appeal, it shall be removed thereafter by following the procedures contemplated under the Act. The writ petition was disposed of with these observations and no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Property Law - Encroachment on Public Property - Sections 6 and 10 of Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - The petitioner sought removal of encroachment from public property. The authorities had issued a final notice under Section 6 of the Act, and the encroacher had preferred an appeal under Section 10 before the District Collector, which was pending. The court held that the authorities should proceed with the appeal and dispose of it expeditiously, and if any encroachment is identified, it shall be removed thereafter following procedures under the Act. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the court should direct removal of encroachment from public property when an appeal against the final notice under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 is pending before the District Collector.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition disposed of with direction to authorities to proceed with the appeal and dispose of it expeditiously. If encroachment is identified, it shall be removed thereafter following procedures under the Act. No costs.

Law Points

  • Encroachment on public property
  • Appeal under Section 10 of Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act
  • 1905
  • Final notice under Section 6 of the Act
  • Disposal of appeal expeditiously
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:MHC:622

W.P.No.3308 of 2022

2026-02-16

S. M. Subramaniam, C. Kumarappan

2026:MHC:622

M. Gnanasekar (for petitioner), T. Arun Kumar (AGP for R1 to R5), V. Suriya Sankar (for R6)

S. Srinivasan

The District Collector, Thiruvallur; The Joint Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Thiruvallur; The Assistant Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Ponneri; The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ponneri; The Tahsildar, Gummudipoondi; M. Sivakumar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking removal of encroachment from public property.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents 1 to 5 to remove encroachment made by 6th respondent in Survey No.209, Village No.62, Pethikuppam, Gummudipoondi Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

Filing Reason

Alleged encroachment on public property by the 6th respondent.

Previous Decisions

Final notice under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 was issued; appeal under Section 10 of the Act is pending before the District Collector.

Issues

Whether the court should direct removal of encroachment when an appeal against the final notice is pending.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner sought removal of encroachment. Government pleader submitted that final notice under Section 6 was issued and appeal under Section 10 is pending before District Collector.

Ratio Decidendi

When an appeal against a final notice under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 is pending, the court should not direct immediate removal but should direct expeditious disposal of the appeal, and removal may follow thereafter as per law.

Judgment Excerpts

Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for R1 to R5 would submit that final notice under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 was issued. Challenging the said notice, the 6th respondent / encroacher preferred an appeal under Section 10 of the Act, 1905 before the District Collector and the said appeal is pending. In view of the above submission, the Authorities shall proceed with the appeal and dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible. In case any encroachment is identified, the same shall be removed thereafter by following procedures contemplated under the Act.

Procedural History

Writ petition filed in 2022. During hearing, it was revealed that final notice under Section 6 of Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 was issued and appeal under Section 10 is pending before District Collector. Court disposed of petition on 16-02-2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905: Section 6, Section 10
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashed Rejection of Junior Clerk’s Appointment Proposal and Imposed Costs on Management. Appointment Order Upheld Despite Procedural Irregularities — Court Directed Approval with Cost Penalty on Management
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will in Testamentary Suit, Upholds Execution Despite Handwritten Additions and Suspicious Circumstances. Propounders Discharged Burden of Proof Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 by Examining Attesting...