Madras High Court Allows Appeal by State of Tamil Nadu in Pay Equivalence Dispute — Lineman of Arasu Rubber Corporation Not Entitled to Government Scale Without Prior Approval. Rule 34 of Arasu Rubber Corporation Service Rules Requires Government Approval for Adoption of State Government Pay Scales, Which Was Not Obtained.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 78
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a Writ Appeal filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and the Managing Director of Arasu Rubber Corporation Limited against a Writ Order dated 01.02.2021 in W.P.No.13025 of 2007. The respondent, V. Shunmugam, a Lineman in Arasu Rubber Corporation Limited, sought quashing of a rejection order and fixation of his pay scale at Rs.610-1075 from 01.06.1988 with subsequent revisions and 5% personal pay from 01.08.1992. The Writ Court had granted relief relying on Rule 34 of the Arasu Rubber Corporation Service Rules, which states that pay and allowances shall be paid at rates applicable to State Government employees. The appellants contended that Government approval is mandatory for implementing equivalent pay scales, and that the Government had rejected such approval. They relied on several Government letters, including Letter No.48070/BPE/2010-1 dated 23.09.2010, which explicitly state that no Government Order shall be adopted by Public Sector Undertakings without prior Government approval, and that financial implications must be endorsed by the Finance Head. The Court analyzed Rule 34 and the Government letters, concluding that the respondent was not entitled to the pay scale without prior Government approval. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Writ Order, and dismissed the Writ Petition. No costs were awarded.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pay Equivalence - Government Approval - Rule 34 of Arasu Rubber Corporation Service Rules - The core issue was whether a Lineman of Arasu Rubber Corporation Limited is entitled to the equivalence scale of pay as applicable to Linemen in the Tamil Nadu Government Department. The Court held that Rule 34 contemplates pay and allowances at rates applicable to State Government employees, but only with prior approval of the Government. Since the Government had rejected approval, the respondent was not entitled to the pay scale. (Paras 2-4)

B) Service Law - Public Sector Undertakings - Adoption of Government Orders - Government Letters dated 04.10.2025, 25.02.2025, 18.08.2022, and 23.09.2010 - The Court relied on Government letters which mandate that no Government Order applicable to Government employees shall be adopted by Public Sector Undertakings without prior Government approval. The letters also require full financial implications and sustainability to be endorsed by the Finance Head. (Para 3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a Lineman working in Arasu Rubber Corporation Limited is entitled to the equivalence scale of pay as applicable to Linemen working in the Government of Tamil Nadu Department, without prior Government approval.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 01.02.2021 in W.P.No.13025 of 2007 is set aside. Consequently, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Law Points

  • Pay equivalence
  • Government approval mandatory
  • Rule 34 of Arasu Rubber Corporation Service Rules
  • Prior approval requirement
  • Public Sector Undertakings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:MHC:880

W.A.No.1804 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.15803 of 2023

2026-02-23

S.M. Subramaniam, C. Kumarappan

2026:MHC:880

Mr.P.Muthukumar, AAG assisted by Mr.R.Mugunthan for Appellants; Mr.M.Ravi for Respondent

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Environment and Forests Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2. The Managing Director, Arasu Rubber Corporation Ltd., Vadaserry, Nagercoil.

V. Shunmugam

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Appeal against a Writ Order granting pay equivalence to a Lineman of Arasu Rubber Corporation Limited.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside the Writ Order dated 01.02.2021 in W.P.No.13025 of 2007.

Filing Reason

The Writ Court granted relief to the respondent based on Rule 34, but the appellants contended that Government approval was mandatory and had been rejected.

Previous Decisions

Writ Court allowed the petition on 01.02.2021, relying on Rule 34 of Arasu Rubber Corporation Service Rules.

Issues

Whether a Lineman of Arasu Rubber Corporation Limited is entitled to the equivalence scale of pay as applicable to Linemen in the Tamil Nadu Government Department without prior Government approval.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that Government approval is mandatory for implementing equivalent pay scales, and that the Government had rejected such approval. They relied on Government letters requiring prior approval for adoption of Government orders by Public Sector Undertakings. Respondent argued that Rule 34 entitles him to pay and allowances at rates applicable to State Government employees.

Ratio Decidendi

Rule 34 of Arasu Rubber Corporation Service Rules requires prior Government approval for adoption of State Government pay scales. Since the Government rejected approval, the respondent is not entitled to the equivalence scale of pay.

Judgment Excerpts

The core issue raised on behalf of the appellant is whether Lineman working in Arasu Rubber Corporation Limited is entitled to get the equivalence scale of pay as applicable to Lineman working in the Government of Tamil Nadu Department. It is true that Rule 34 contemplates that the pay and allowances will be paid to Corporation employees at the rates applicable to State Government employees from time to time. Approval of the Government is required and in the present case, the approval, since rejected, the respondent is not entitled for the pay and allowances as applicable to employees of the State Government.

Procedural History

The respondent filed W.P.No.13025 of 2007 seeking pay equivalence. The Writ Court allowed the petition on 01.02.2021. The appellants filed the present Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Arasu Rubber Corporation Service Rules: Rule 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Appeal by State of Tamil Nadu in Pay Equivalence Dispute — Lineman of Arasu Rubber Corporation Not Entitled to Government Scale Without Prior Approval. Rule 34 of Arasu Rubber Corporation Service Rules Requires Government A...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased Driver. Claimants' Cross-Objection for Enhanced Compensation Dismissed as Deceased's Own Negligence Was Established.