Madras High Court Allows Writ Appeal in Contractual GST Dispute, Holds Writ Jurisdiction Not Available. Dispute Regarding Tax Payment Under Construction Contract Must Be Resolved Through Arbitration or Civil Court, Not Writ Proceedings.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The respondent, P.S.T. Engineering Construction, a contractor, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court challenging resolution No.4.17/487 dated 10.08.2018 of the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board (TNSCB) and subsequent proceedings, seeking direction to release a balance sum of Rs.2,75,44,915/- along with 1% bonus. The resolution pertained to the construction of 864 tenements under PMAY(U)-HFA scheme and dealt with the contractor's request to pay GST at 12% of the accepted tender value in addition to the bill value. The Board resolved to consult a consultant/auditor approved by CMRL/Government Department to verify the claims under GST. The writ petition was allowed by a learned single judge on 4.4.2022. The appellants, the Government of Tamil Nadu and TNSCB, filed the present writ appeal. The Division Bench examined the contract terms, noting that Clause 6.6 and special conditions provided that all applicable taxes are to be paid and Government Order G.O.264 dated 15.09.2017 would apply. The court observed that there was a dispute regarding payment of tax based on the contract terms, and such disputes cannot be resolved in writ proceedings. The court set aside the writ order and allowed the writ appeal, directing the parties to resolve the dispute either by invoking arbitration clause or by approaching the competent forum in the manner known to law. No costs were awarded.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Contractual Disputes - Dispute regarding payment of GST under a construction contract - The court held that since there is a dispute regarding payment of tax based on the terms and conditions of contract, the issues cannot be resolved in writ proceedings - Held that the writ order is set aside and the Writ Appeal stands allowed (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a writ petition is maintainable for resolving a dispute regarding payment of GST under a construction contract, or whether the parties should be relegated to arbitration or civil court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ order is set aside and the Writ Appeal stands allowed. No costs.

Law Points

  • Writ jurisdiction not available for contractual disputes
  • Dispute resolution through arbitration or civil court
  • Tax payment under contract terms
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (03) 310

WA No. 1790 of 2022 and CMP No. 13123 of 2022

2026-03-04

S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender

2026:MHC:950

Mr.Ramanlal, Additional Advocate General, assisted by Mr.T.Arunkumar for Additional Government Pleader; Mr.H.S.Hredai

The Government of Tamil Nadu, The Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, The Superintending Engineer

P.S.T. Engineering Construction

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeal against order allowing writ petition seeking release of balance payment and bonus under a construction contract, involving dispute over GST payment.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside the order of the learned single judge in WP.No.34682/2019 and WP.No.34687/2019 dated 4.4.2022.

Filing Reason

Dispute regarding payment of GST at 12% on the tender value under a construction contract between the contractor and the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board.

Previous Decisions

The learned single judge allowed the writ petition on 4.4.2022, directing release of balance sum and bonus.

Issues

Whether a writ petition is maintainable for resolving a contractual dispute regarding tax payment. Whether the parties should be relegated to arbitration or civil court for resolution of the dispute.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the dispute regarding tax payment is contractual and cannot be resolved in writ proceedings. Respondent sought enforcement of payment under the contract.

Ratio Decidendi

Disputes arising from contractual terms, especially regarding tax payment, cannot be resolved in writ proceedings; parties must invoke arbitration clause or approach competent forum.

Judgment Excerpts

Since there is a dispute caused regarding payment of tax, based on the terms and conditions of contract, the issues cannot be resolved in a writ proceedings. Thus, the writ order is set aside and the Writ Appeal stands allowed.

Procedural History

The respondent filed WP.No.34682/2019 and WP.No.34687/2019 before the Madras High Court, which were allowed by a learned single judge on 4.4.2022. The appellants filed the present writ appeal against that order.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Writ Appeal in Contractual GST Dispute, Holds Writ Jurisdiction Not Available. Dispute Regarding Tax Payment Under Construction Contract Must Be Resolved Through Arbitration or Civil Court, Not Writ Proceedings.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Probate Case, Reinstating District Court's Grant of Probate for Two Wills. The Court Held That Alleged Suspicious Circumstances, Including Exclusion of a Daughter and Delay in Probate, Were Insufficient to Invalidate th...