Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition in Water Resources Case — No Willful Disobedience Found as Government Sanctioned Funds for Tank Construction. Court directs expeditious construction of tank at Veppamkuppam pursuant to G.O.(2D).No.258, Water Resources (WR2) Department, dated 06.12.2023.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 22
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The contempt petition was filed by T. Sampath against four contemnors, including the Secretary to Government, Water Resources Organisation, and other engineers, alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 03.11.2023 in W.A.No.3022 of 2023. The earlier order had expected the Government to take effective steps when surplus water enters agricultural land and to take a decision on administrative sanction expeditiously, preferably within six months. The learned Special Government Pleader submitted that the Government had issued G.O.(2D).No.258, Water Resources (WR2) Department, dated 06.12.2023, sanctioning funds for construction of a tank at Veppamkuppam, and the process was under progress. The court held that since funds were sanctioned, it was a policy decision of the Government and there was no willful disobedience. The court directed the respondents to ensure construction of the tank as expeditiously as possible and closed the contempt petition with no costs.

Headnote

A) Contempt of Court - Willful Disobedience - Section 11, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - The court examined whether the respondents willfully disobeyed the order directing expeditious decision on administrative sanction for construction of a tank. Since the Government issued G.O.(2D).No.258 dated 06.12.2023 sanctioning funds, the court found no willful disobedience and closed the contempt petition, directing expeditious construction. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents committed willful disobedience of the court's order dated 03.11.2023 in W.A.No.3022 of 2023 by not constructing the tank within the expected timeline.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The contempt petition is closed. No costs. Respondents shall ensure construction of tank as expeditiously as possible.

Law Points

  • Contempt of Courts Act
  • 1971
  • Section 11
  • Willful disobedience
  • Policy decision
  • No willful disobedience if substantial compliance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (03) 280

CONT P No. 1646 of 2025

2026-03-17

S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender

2026:MHC:1167

Mr. P. Mohanraj for petitioner, Mr. U.M. Ravichandran, Special Government Pleader for contemnors

T. Sampath

Mrs. S. Malarvizhi, IAS., Secretary To Government, Water Resources Organisation, Chennai; Er. Janaki, Chief Engineer, Water Resources Organisation, Chennai Region; Mr. V.V. Prabakar, Executive Engineer, Water Resources Organisation, Mel Palar Basin Division, Vellore; Mr. G.C. Prasanna, Assistant Engineer, Water Resources Organisation, Irrigation Section, Ambur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Contempt petition for alleged willful disobedience of court order in a water resources matter.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to punish the respondents for willfully disobeying the order dated 03.11.2023 in W.A.No.3022 of 2023.

Filing Reason

Alleged failure of respondents to take effective steps for construction of a tank despite court order.

Previous Decisions

The court in W.A.No.3022 of 2023 dated 03.11.2023 expected the Government to take effective steps and take a decision on administrative sanction expeditiously, preferably within six months.

Issues

Whether the respondents committed willful disobedience of the court's order dated 03.11.2023 in W.A.No.3022 of 2023.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that respondents willfully disobeyed the court order by not constructing the tank. Respondents submitted that Government issued G.O.(2D).No.258 dated 06.12.2023 sanctioning funds for construction of tank at Veppamkuppam and process is under progress.

Ratio Decidendi

Since the Government sanctioned funds for the tank construction, it is a policy decision and there is no willful disobedience of the court order. The contempt petition is closed with a direction to expedite construction.

Judgment Excerpts

Para 5 of the order reads as follows: 'We are not issuing a specific timeline, however, it is expected that when surplus water is entering the land of the agriculturist, the Government shall take effective steps...' Learned Special Government Pleader based on the instructions, made a submission that Government issued G.O.(2D).No.258, Water Resources (WR2) Department, dated 06.12.2023, and sanctioned funds for construction of tank at Veppamkuppam. Since funds have been sanctioned, respondents shall ensure construction of tank as expeditiously as possible.

Procedural History

The contempt petition was filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 03.11.2023 in W.A.No.3022 of 2023. The court heard the Special Government Pleader and closed the petition on 17.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Contempt of Courts Act, 1971: Section 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition in Water Resources Case — No Willful Disobedience Found as Government Sanctioned Funds for Tank Construction. Court directs expeditious construction of tank at Veppamkuppam pursuant to G.O.(2D).No.258, Wat...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.