Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representations Before Eviction in Encroachment Cases Under Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act. Petitioners' explanations under Section 128 must be considered before final orders; status quo ordered pending decision.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 85
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, P.Vijaya and E.Lakshmi, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging show cause notices dated 13.02.2026 issued by the Commissioner of Thirukovilur Municipality under Section 128(1)(b)(2) of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998. The notices alleged that the petitioners had encroached upon a water body and threatened eviction and demolition of their residential house and flower shops situated at No.19, Union Office Road, Thirukovilur, Kallakurichi. The petitioners had submitted their explanations on 25.02.2026, but before any final decision was taken, the respondents were attempting to evict them. The court noted that the statute mandates that any representation received within the prescribed time limit must be considered by the authority before passing final orders. The learned counsel for the petitioners argued that the impugned notice revealed the alleged encroachment was within a water body, but the authority could not proceed without considering the explanations. The court held that the procedures under Section 128 must be scrupulously followed, and the competent authority must pass final orders before initiating any enforcement action for removal of encroachments. Accordingly, the court directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' explanations and pass final orders within two weeks, maintaining status quo until then. The writ petitions were disposed of with these directions.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law - Encroachment - Show Cause Notice - Section 128(1)(b)(2) Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 - Petitioners challenged show cause notices alleging encroachment on water body - Court held that the authority must consider representations received within the prescribed time limit before passing final orders and initiating enforcement action - Directed respondents to consider explanations and pass final orders within two weeks, maintaining status quo until then (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the authority can proceed with eviction without considering the petitioners' explanations submitted in response to show cause notices under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' explanations and pass final orders within two weeks. Until then, status quo as on date shall be maintained. The writ petitions were disposed of.

Law Points

  • Statutory compliance
  • Natural justice
  • Consideration of representation before final order
  • Section 128 Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act 1998
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (03) 31

W.P. Nos. 11550 and 11554 of 2026

2026-03-26

S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender

Ms. Sasi.V, Mr.D.Ravichander, Dr.T.Seenivasan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging show cause notices under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998, alleging encroachment on a water body.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of show cause notices and a direction to forbear respondents from evicting them or demolishing their properties without due process of law.

Filing Reason

Petitioners received show cause notices dated 13.02.2026 alleging encroachment on a water body and faced threat of eviction and demolition despite having submitted explanations on 25.02.2026.

Issues

Whether the respondents can proceed with eviction without considering the petitioners' explanations submitted in response to show cause notices under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners submitted that they had given explanations on 25.02.2026 but the authority was attempting to evict them without passing final orders. Respondents argued through counsel that the alleged encroachment was within a water body.

Ratio Decidendi

The authority must consider any representation received within the prescribed time limit before passing final orders under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998, and cannot initiate enforcement action without a final order.

Judgment Excerpts

It is needless to state that the procedures contemplated under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, must be scrupulously followed by the authority. The statute mandates that any representation received within the prescribed time limit shall be considered by the authority or the officer concerned before passing final orders.

Procedural History

Petitioners filed writ petitions on 26.03.2026 challenging show cause notices dated 13.02.2026. The court heard both sides and disposed of the petitions on the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998: 128, 128(1)(b)(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Kidnapping Case Based on Recovery of Abductee and Circumstantial Evidence. Life Sentence Under Sections 364A/368 IPC Confirmed as Testimony of Child Victim and Recovery of Clothes and Toys Corroborate Prosecution C...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representations Before Eviction in Encroachment Cases Under Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act. Petitioners' explanations under Section 128 must be considered before final orders; status quo ordered pending d...