Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachments on Public Road in Namakkal District — Revenue Authorities Ordered to Complete Action Within Twelve Weeks. Court directed respondents 3 and 4 to initiate enforcement action and remove encroachments identified by survey following procedures under relevant statute and rules.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, V. Manoharan, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court seeking a direction to the District Collector, District Revenue Officer, Revenue Divisional Officer, and Tahsildar of Namakkal District (respondents 1 to 4) to take necessary action to remove encroachments allegedly made by private respondents (K. Prabhu, K. Dinesh, P. Ambika, and Divya) on a public road situated in Survey No. 118/7, Alankanatham Privu, Senthamangalam Taluk, Namakkal District. The petitioner had made multiple representations dated 26.12.2022, 06.11.2023, 06.01.2025, 07.03.2025, and 18.08.2025 to the authorities, but no action was taken. During the hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 4, based on written instructions from the Tahsildar, submitted that the revenue authorities had conducted a survey and identified encroachments, and further action would be initiated for their removal. In view of this submission, the court directed respondents 3 and 4 (the Revenue Divisional Officer and Tahsildar) to initiate enforcement action and remove the identified encroachments by following the procedures contemplated under the relevant statute and rules in force. The exercise was directed to be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Public Law - Encroachment on Public Road - Removal of Encroachments - Relevant Statute and Rules - Petitioner sought direction to revenue authorities to remove encroachments made by private respondents on a public road in S.No.118/7, Alankanatham Privu, Senthamangalam Taluk, Namakkal District. Revenue authorities conducted survey and identified encroachments. Court directed respondents 3 and 4 to initiate enforcement action and remove encroachments following procedures under relevant statute and rules within twelve weeks. Held that the authorities must act on identified encroachments (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents should be directed to remove encroachments on a public road based on the petitioner's representations.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court disposed of the writ petition directing respondents 3 and 4 to initiate enforcement action and remove encroachments identified by following procedures under relevant statute and rules within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. No costs.

Law Points

  • Public road encroachment
  • removal of encroachments
  • duty of revenue authorities
  • enforcement action under relevant statute and rules
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (04) 170

W.P.No.50625 of 2025

2026-04-29

S.M. Subramaniam, K. Surender

2026:MHC:1740

Mr. G.V. Mohan Kumar for petitioner, Mr. T. Arun Kumar, AGP for R1 to R4

V. Manoharan

The District Collector, The District Revenue Officer, The Revenue Divisional Officer, The Tahsildar, K. Prabhu, K. Dinesh, P. Ambika, Divya

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction to remove encroachments on a public road.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents 1 to 4 to take action to remove encroachments made by private respondents on a public road.

Filing Reason

Failure of revenue authorities to act on representations regarding encroachments on a public road.

Issues

Whether the respondents should be directed to remove encroachments on a public road based on the petitioner's representations.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that private respondents encroached on a public road and despite multiple representations, no action was taken. Respondents 1 to 4, through the Additional Government Pleader, submitted that survey was conducted and encroachments identified, and further action will be initiated.

Ratio Decidendi

Revenue authorities are duty-bound to act on identified encroachments on public roads and must initiate enforcement action following statutory procedures.

Judgment Excerpts

Revenue Authorities conducted survey and identified encroachments. Therefore, further action will be initiated for removal of encroachments. respondents 3 & 4 are directed to initiate enforcement action and remove encroachments identified by following procedures as contemplated under the relevant Statute and Rules in force.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed W.P.No.50625 of 2025 before the Madras High Court seeking a direction to remove encroachments. The court heard the matter and disposed of the petition on 29-04-2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Relevant Statute and Rules in force:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(j)(n) and 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Deduction of Contributory Negligence. The court held that the deceased was contributory negligent for not wearing a helmet, reducing...