Madras High Court Directs Survey and Removal of Encroachments on Water Resources Land — Writ Petition Disposed with Directions to Complete Exercise Within Twelve Weeks. Court orders survey and enforcement action after opportunity of hearing, within twelve weeks.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 98
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M.Shanmugasundaram, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court seeking a direction to respondents 4 and 5 (Assistant Engineer, Water Resources Department and Assistant Executive Engineer, Highways Department) to remove encroachments from certain survey numbers in Erode District. The petitioner had made a representation dated 02.12.2025 regarding the encroachments. The court noted that the Additional Government Pleader submitted that the Water Resources Department had sought assistance from Revenue Authorities for survey but the Tahsildar had not responded for four months. The court directed the respondents to conduct a survey, then initiate enforcement action if encroachments are identified, after affording opportunity to the encroachers. The entire exercise was to be completed within twelve weeks from receipt of the order. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs.

Headnote

A) Encroachment - Removal - Survey - Opportunity of Hearing - The court directed the respondents to conduct a survey to identify encroachments on water resources land and thereafter initiate enforcement action after affording opportunity to encroachers, to be completed within twelve weeks. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents should be directed to remove encroachments on government land based on the petitioner's representation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to conduct survey, initiate enforcement action if encroachments are identified after affording opportunity to encroachers, to be completed within twelve weeks from receipt of the order. No costs.

Law Points

  • Encroachment removal
  • Survey
  • Opportunity of hearing
  • Time-bound compliance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (04) 168

W.P.No.3013 of 2026

2026-04-29

S.M.Subramaniam, K.Surender

2026:MHC:1738

Mr.J.Titus Enock (Petitioner), Mr.T. Arun Kumar, AGP (Respondents)

M.Shanmugasundaram

The District Collector, Tahsildhar, Assistant Executive Engineer (Highways), Assistant Engineer (Water Resources)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking removal of encroachments on government land.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents 4 and 5 to remove encroachments in specified survey numbers by considering representation dated 02.12.2025.

Filing Reason

Alleged encroachments on water resources land and inaction on representation.

Issues

Whether the respondents should be directed to remove encroachments on government land based on the petitioner's representation.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner sought removal of encroachments. Respondents submitted that survey was pending due to non-response from Tahsildar.

Ratio Decidendi

The court directed survey and enforcement action with opportunity of hearing, emphasizing time-bound compliance.

Judgment Excerpts

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the respondents 4 and 5 to remove the encroachments made in S.No.21/1... In view of the said factum, the respondents are directed to conduct survey and thereafter, initiate necessary enforcement action, if any encroachments are identified.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed writ petition on 29-04-2026 seeking removal of encroachments. Court heard submissions and disposed of the petition with directions.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Restitution of Conjugal Rights Decree for Husband in Mohomedan Law Case — Wife’s Cruelty Defence Rejected as Unsubstantiated. Wife Failed to Prove Cruelty Under Section 281(2) of Mohomedan Law to Defeat Husband’s Suit ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Property Tax Reassessment by Municipal Corporation. Reassessment After 30 Years Without Notice and Hearing Violates Section 154 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 and Principles of Natural...