Madras High Court Disposes of Employer-Employee Writ Appeals by Consent — Parties Directed to Abide by Compromise Terms. Deposit of Rs.10 Lakhs with Labour Court to be Withdrawn by Employee and Interest by Management.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 42
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns two writ appeals arising from a common order dated 26.08.2025 in W.P.No.1849 of 2022 and a subsequent compensation order dated 28.08.2025. The appellant in W.A.No.4013 of 2025 is M/s.Tractors & Farm Equipment Limited, represented by its Chairman/Owner C.P.Sounderarajan, and the respondent is T.Ramesh, an employee. In W.A.No.3979 of 2025, T.Ramesh is the appellant and the company is the respondent. The parties entered into negotiations and arrived at a settlement, executing a memorandum of compromise on 28.04.2026. The court noted that in view of the compromise, no further adjudication is required and directed the parties to abide by the terms agreed. Specifically, regarding a deposit of Rs.10 Lakhs made by the management with the II Additional Labour Court, Chennai, in I.D.No.139 of 2018, the parties agreed that the employee would withdraw the principal amount and the management would withdraw the accrued interest. The court directed the II Additional Labour Court to permit withdrawal within two weeks of receipt of the order. Consequently, both writ appeals were disposed of in terms of the compromise.

Headnote

A) Labour Law - Compromise and Settlement - Disposal of Appeals - Parties entered into a memorandum of compromise dated 28.04.2026 settling all disputes - Court held that no further adjudication is required and directed parties to abide by the agreed terms - Also directed that the deposit of Rs.10 Lakhs with the II Additional Labour Court, Chennai, be withdrawn by the employee and the interest by the management (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the writ appeals should be adjudicated or disposed of in terms of a compromise between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ appeals disposed of in terms of the memorandum of compromise dated 28.04.2026. Parties directed to abide by the terms. II Additional Labour Court, Chennai, directed to permit withdrawal of Rs.10 Lakhs deposit and interest as agreed within two weeks.

Law Points

  • Compromise
  • Settlement
  • Withdrawal of Deposits
  • Labour Court
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (04) 7

W.A.Nos.4013 & 3979 of 2025 and C.M.P.Nos.32562, 32261 & 32266 of 2025

2026-04-29

S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender

Mr.S.Shivathanu Mohan for M/s.S.Ramasubramaniam and Associates (for appellant in W.A.No.4013/2025 and respondent in W.A.No.3979/2025); Mr.T.Ramesh party-in-person (for respondent in W.A.No.4013/2025 and appellant in W.A.No.3979/2025)

M/s.Tractors & Farm Equipment Limited (in W.A.No.4013 of 2025); T.Ramesh (in W.A.No.3979 of 2025)

T.Ramesh (in W.A.No.4013 of 2025); M/s.Tractors & Farm Equipment Limited (in W.A.No.3979 of 2025)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeals against common order dated 26.08.2025 in W.P.No.1849 of 2022 and compensation order dated 28.08.2025.

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of the common order and compensation order.

Filing Reason

Dispute between employer and employee leading to writ petitions and appeals.

Previous Decisions

Common order dated 26.08.2025 in W.P.No.1849 of 2022 and compensation order dated 28.08.2025.

Issues

Whether the appeals should be adjudicated or disposed of by compromise.

Submissions/Arguments

Parties entered into compromise and filed memorandum of compromise dated 28.04.2026.

Ratio Decidendi

When parties enter into a compromise, no further adjudication is required and the court may dispose of the matter in terms of the settlement.

Judgment Excerpts

In view of the compromise between the parties, no further adjudication is required and the parties are directed to abide by the terms agreed between them.

Procedural History

W.P.No.1849 of 2022 was disposed of by common order dated 26.08.2025 and compensation order dated 28.08.2025. Against these, two writ appeals were filed. The parties subsequently settled and filed a memorandum of compromise on 28.04.2026.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes of Employer-Employee Writ Appeals by Consent — Parties Directed to Abide by Compromise Terms. Deposit of Rs.10 Lakhs with Labour Court to be Withdrawn by Employee and Interest by Management.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Suit — Upholds Refusal to Strike Out Defence Under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC for Failure to File Written Statement Within 90 Days. The court held that the power to strike out defence is discretionary and no...