Gujarat High Court Allows Time to File Appeal and Converts Non-Bailable Warrant to Bailable Warrant in NI Act Case — Petitioner Granted Relief to Appear Before Trial Court. Court Permits Filing of Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Converts Non-Bailable Warrant to Bailable Warrant to Enable Petitioner to Furnish Bail.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shah Rupal Mahendrabhai, filed two Special Criminal Applications under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat High Court seeking relief against orders passed by the learned 15th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad in Criminal Case No.2746 of 2017 and Criminal Case No.2754 of 2017. The background of the case involves complaints lodged against the petitioner for offences punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act). Upon filing of the complaints, the trial court issued summons to the petitioner, who initially appeared and was provided documents under Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), and his plea was recorded at Exhibit-8. The complainant entered the witness box, and the matter reached the stage of cross-examination by the petitioner. However, thereafter, the petitioner failed to appear before the trial court either personally or through his advocate. Consequently, the trial court closed the cross-examination stage and proceeded to record the further statement of the petitioner. The petitioner again failed to appear, leading the trial court to proceed ex-parte. On 20.02.2026, the trial court convicted the petitioner under Section 138 of the NI Act and ordered issuance of a non-bailable warrant against him. Aggrieved by the issuance of the warrant, the petitioner approached the High Court seeking time to file an appeal against the conviction order and conversion of the non-bailable warrant into a bailable warrant to enable him to appear before the trial court and furnish bail. The High Court, after considering the submissions, allowed the petitions. The court permitted the petitioner to file an appeal against the orders dated 20.02.2026 within a stipulated time and directed that upon filing the appeal, the petitioner be allowed to pay the amount as specified in the trial court's order within the time stipulated therein. Additionally, the court converted the non-bailable warrant issued against the petitioner into a bailable warrant to facilitate his appearance before the trial court for furnishing bail. The court also stayed the proceedings of the criminal cases pending further orders. The judgment was delivered by Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey on 16/03/2026.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Non-Bailable Warrant - Conversion to Bailable Warrant - Article 226 of Constitution of India - Petitioner convicted under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and non-bailable warrant issued due to non-appearance - Court allowed conversion to bailable warrant to enable petitioner to appear and furnish bail, holding that such conversion is in the interest of justice to allow the petitioner to participate in proceedings (Paras 1-4).

B) Negotiable Instruments Act - Section 138 - Appeal - Extension of Time - Article 226 of Constitution of India - Petitioner sought time to file appeal against conviction order dated 20.02.2026 - Court permitted petitioner to file appeal within stipulated time and to pay the amount as per the order, holding that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to avail statutory remedy (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner should be granted time to file an appeal against the conviction order under Section 138 of the NI Act and whether the non-bailable warrant issued by the trial court should be converted into a bailable warrant to enable the petitioner to appear before the trial court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the petitions. It permitted the petitioner to file an appeal against the orders dated 20.02.2026 within a stipulated time and directed that upon filing the appeal, the petitioner be allowed to pay the amount as specified in the trial court's order within the time stipulated therein. The court also converted the non-bailable warrant issued against the petitioner into a bailable warrant to enable him to appear before the trial court for furnishing bail. The proceedings of the criminal cases were stayed pending further orders.

Law Points

  • Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
  • 1881
  • Article 226 of Constitution of India
  • Section 207 of Code of Criminal Procedure
  • 1973
  • Conversion of non-bailable warrant to bailable warrant
  • Extension of time to file appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:20051

R/Special Criminal Application (Direction) No. 3578 of 2026 with R/Special Criminal Application No. 3590 of 2026

2026-03-16

M. R. Mengdey

2026:GUJHC:20051

Prashant V Chavda for the Applicant(s) No. 1, Ms. Ashmita Pate, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1

Shah Rupal Mahendrabhai

State of Gujarat & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to allow time to file appeal and conversion of non-bailable warrant to bailable warrant.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought time to file appeal against conviction orders dated 20.02.2026 and conversion of non-bailable warrant into bailable warrant to enable appearance before trial court.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was convicted ex-parte under Section 138 of NI Act and non-bailable warrant was issued due to his non-appearance.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted petitioner on 20.02.2026 and issued non-bailable warrant.

Issues

Whether the petitioner should be granted time to file an appeal against the conviction order under Section 138 of the NI Act? Whether the non-bailable warrant issued by the trial court should be converted into a bailable warrant to enable the petitioner to appear before the trial court?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he was unable to appear before the trial court due to circumstances and sought time to file appeal and conversion of warrant to bailable warrant. Respondent State opposed the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that in the interest of justice, the petitioner should be given an opportunity to file an appeal against the conviction order and to appear before the trial court by converting the non-bailable warrant into a bailable warrant, as the petitioner had initially participated in the proceedings but later failed to appear.

Judgment Excerpts

By filing the petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: - The facts and circumstances giving rise to the filing of the present petition are such that a complaint for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I. Act came to be lodged against the petitioner. Learned Trial Court decided to proceed ex-parte and vide judgment and orders dated 20.02.2026 convicted the petitioner for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and ordered issuance of warrant against the petitioner.

Procedural History

Complaints under Section 138 NI Act filed against petitioner. Trial court issued summons; petitioner appeared and plea recorded. Complainant examined; cross-examination closed due to petitioner's absence. Trial court proceeded ex-parte and convicted petitioner on 20.02.2026, issuing non-bailable warrant. Petitioner filed Special Criminal Applications under Article 226 before Gujarat High Court on 16/03/2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 207
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Unconditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Diamond Recovery — Jangad Notes Held to Be Mere Acknowledgments of Entrustment Without Promise to Pay, Raising Triable Issues Under Order 37 CPC.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Quashes Income Tax Reopening Notices in Search-Based Assessment Cases Due to Mandatory Application of Section 153C. Assessing Officer Cannot Invoke General Reassessment Provisions Under Sections 147/148 When Material Originates from Search...