Gujarat High Court Directs Consideration of Compassionate Appointment Application Under 2011 GR in Writ Petition Filed After 15 Years. Pending Application for Compassionate Appointment Must Be Decided as Per Clause 6 of Government Resolution Dated 05.07.2011.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dineshkumar Becharbhai Khadayata, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondents to grant him compassionate appointment. His father died while in service on 04.02.2006, and the petitioner submitted an application for compassionate appointment on 07.04.2006, which remained pending for nearly 15 years. The State of Gujarat had issued a Government Resolution (GR) dated 05.07.2011, which introduced a scheme of lump-sum compensation in lieu of compassionate appointment. Clause 6 of the GR specifically provided that any pending application for compassionate appointment as on the date of the resolution would be considered under the new GR. The Court noted that the petitioner's application had been pending since 2006 and that the petitioner had not approached the Court earlier. However, the Court found that the respondents were obligated to consider the application in light of the GR. The Court directed the respondents to treat the petition as a representation and decide the petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment or lump-sum compensation in accordance with the GR dated 05.07.2011, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the order. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Compassionate Appointment - Pending Application - Government Resolution dated 05.07.2011, Clause 6 - The petitioner's father died in service on 04.02.2006; the petitioner applied for compassionate appointment on 07.04.2006, which remained pending. The State issued a GR on 05.07.2011 offering lump-sum compensation in lieu of appointment, with Clause 6 directing that pending applications be considered under the new GR. The Court held that the respondents must consider the petitioner's application in accordance with the GR dated 05.07.2011 and pass a reasoned order within eight weeks. (Paras 4-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to compassionate appointment or lump-sum compensation under the Government Resolution dated 05.07.2011, given that his application of 2006 remained pending.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court directed the respondents to treat the petition as a representation and decide the petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment or lump-sum compensation in accordance with the Government Resolution dated 05.07.2011, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of the order. The petition was disposed of.

Law Points

  • Compassionate appointment
  • pending application
  • Government Resolution dated 05.07.2011
  • lump-sum compensation in lieu of appointment
  • Clause 6 of GR
  • Article 226 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 1121

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4472 of 2021

2026-03-13

Maulik J. Shelat

2026:GUJHC:18979

Romesh C Niven, Dhruti Pandya, RV Acharya

Dineshkumar Becharbhai Khadayata

State of Gujarat & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking compassionate appointment.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to grant compassionate appointment to the petitioner.

Filing Reason

Father of petitioner died in service on 04.02.2006; application for compassionate appointment dated 07.04.2006 remained pending.

Issues

Whether the petitioner's pending application for compassionate appointment should be considered under the Government Resolution dated 05.07.2011.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that his application for compassionate appointment remained pending since 2006. Respondents did not dispute the pendency of the application and referred to the GR dated 05.07.2011.

Ratio Decidendi

Pending applications for compassionate appointment as on the date of the Government Resolution dated 05.07.2011 must be considered under the said resolution, which offers lump-sum compensation in lieu of appointment.

Judgment Excerpts

It is not in dispute between the parties that father of the petitioner died during his service with respondent on 04.02.2006 and to get compassionate appointment, petitioner submitted an application dated 07.04.2006, which was remained pending till date. As per the Clause 6 of the said resolution, any application in regards to compassionate appointment is pending as on date, the same shall be considered as per the said resolution.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India on an unspecified date. The petition was heard on 13/03/2026 and disposed of on the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Directs Consideration of Compassionate Appointment Application Under 2011 GR in Writ Petition Filed After 15 Years. Pending Application for Compassionate Appointment Must Be Decided as Per Clause 6 of Government Resolution Dated 05...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Remand Order in Property Suit — Trial Court's Judgment Set Aside for Failure to Frame Issues and Consider Evidence. Lower Appellate Court's Remand Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC Upheld as Proper Exercise of Po...