High Court Allows Transfer of Husband's Family Suit from Ahmedabad to Jetpur on Wife's Application and Consent of Parties. Transfer Granted Under Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as Respondent Showed No Resistance.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant-wife filed a miscellaneous civil application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking transfer of Family Suit No. 2987 of 2025, which was filed by the respondent-husband, from the Family Court at Ahmedabad to the Family Court at Jetpur. Several other proceedings between the parties were already pending at Jetpur, including Family Suit No. 3 of 2024, Civil Misc. Application No. 1 of 2026, Criminal Misc. Application No. 257 of 2021 and Criminal Complaint No. 40 of 2022. The wife contended that it would be convenient to have all matters heard at Jetpur. The husband, through his advocate, stated that he had no objection to the transfer. Both learned advocates, upon instructions, came to a consensus for the transfer. The High Court noted that since there was no resistance from the husband, the transfer could be allowed. Consequently, the court ordered the transfer of Family Suit No. 2987 of 2025 from Ahmedabad to Jetpur. The parties also requested directions for consolidation of Family Suit No. 3 of 2024, Civil Misc. Application No. 1 of 2026 and the transferred suit, and for permission to appear via video conference in the proceedings. The court granted liberty to the parties to file appropriate applications for consolidation before the Family Court at Jetpur, which would be decided on merits and in accordance with law. It also permitted the parties to request the Family Court to allow appearance through video conference mode. The rule was made absolute, and the application was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Suit - Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The High Court transferred the husband's Family Suit No. 2987 of 2025 from Ahmedabad to Jetpur on the wife's application, noting that the respondent-husband had no objection and both parties consented to the transfer - Held that transfer can be allowed when parties consent and no prejudice is shown (Paras 5-8).

B) Civil Procedure - Consolidation of Suits and Video Conference - Not specified - The Court permitted the parties to move appropriate applications for consolidation of Family Suit No. 3 of 2024, Civil Misc. Application No. 1 of 2026 and Family Suit No. 2987 of 2025, and to request appearance through video conference - Held that such liberty may be granted for convenience and to avoid multiplicity (Paras 6-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether Family Suit No. 2987 of 2025 pending before the Family Court, Ahmedabad should be transferred to the Family Court at Jetpur

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Family Suit No. 2987 of 2025 pending before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Ahmedabad is ordered to be transferred to the Family Court at Jetpur. Rule is made absolute. Liberty granted to parties to move appropriate applications for consolidation of Family Suit No. 3 of 2024, Civil Misc. Application No. 1 of 2026 and Family Suit No. 2987 of 2025, and to request appearance through video conference mode, to be decided by the Family Court on merits and in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Transfer of proceedings under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure
  • 1908 can be ordered on consent of parties and absence of resistance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 518

R/Misc. Civil Application (For Transfer) No. 2729 of 2025

2026-03-20

Devan M. Desai

2026:GUJHC:22754

Jaimin D Pandya, Premal S Rachh for applicant; Jaspalsinh R Jadeja for opponent

Gretaben Mitesh Vekariya D/o. Govindbhai Rupapara

Mitesh Ratilal Vekariya

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application under Section 24 of CPC for transfer of family suit

Remedy Sought

Applicant-wife sought transfer of Family Suit No. 2987 of 2025 from Family Court, Ahmedabad to Family Court, Jetpur

Filing Reason

The wife wanted the suit to be heard at Jetpur where other proceedings between the parties were already pending, for convenience

Issues

Whether Family Suit No. 2987 of 2025 pending before the Family Court, Ahmedabad should be transferred to the Family Court at Jetpur

Submissions/Arguments

Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the transfer was necessary for the convenience of the wife and to consolidate proceedings; learned advocate for the opponent submitted that the husband had no objection to the transfer and consented to the same

Ratio Decidendi

When the respondent-husband has no objection and both parties consent, a transfer under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 can be ordered to serve the ends of convenience and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

the respondent - husband has no objection if the Family Suit No. 2987 of 2025 pending before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Ahmedabad is transferred to learned Family Court at Jetpur. Family Suit No. 2987 of 2025 is ordered to be transferred from learned Family Court Ahmedabad to learned Family Court, Jetpur. Rule is made absolute accordingly.

Procedural History

The application under Section 24 CPC was filed. Notice was served. The opponent appeared and waived service of rule. With consent of both parties, the matter was taken up for final hearing. The application was allowed and the transfer was ordered.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: 24
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Pre-Execution Challenge to Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA; Maintainability of Writ Petitions and Grounds for Interference are Limited to Five Exhaustive Grounds as per Gadia’s Case. Court Rejects Reques...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay Heard Constitutional Challenge to Section 31-A of the NDPS Act, 1985, Imposing Mandatory Death Penalty for Repeat Drug Offences. The petition questioned whether mandatory death penalty for non-homicidal drug offence...