Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2014-2015 — Notice Issued Beyond Surviving Time Under TOLA Held Invalid. The court applied the principle of 'surviving time' from Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal to determine that the notice dated 30.07.2022 was time-barred as the period between the original TOLA notice and 30.06.2021 was less than the time required for compliance.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 150
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ashokbhai Nanubhai Patel, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 30.07.2022 issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2014-2015. The notice was originally issued on 24.06.2021 during the extended period under the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 (TOLA). Following the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal, the notice was to be treated as a notice under section 148A(b) of the Act, which came into effect from 01.04.2021. The Supreme Court in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal laid down the 'surviving time' principle to determine the validity of such notices based on the time left between the original TOLA notice and 30.06.2021. The Gujarat High Court, relying on its earlier decision in Dhanraj Govindram Kella v. Income Tax Officer, held that each case must be examined individually. In this case, the court found that the notice dated 30.07.2022 was issued beyond the surviving time and was therefore invalid and time-barred. The court quashed the notice and allowed the petition.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Reassessment Notice - Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Validity of Notice under TOLA - The court considered whether a notice under section 148 issued during the extended period under TOLA could be treated as valid after the decision in Ashish Agarwal. The court applied the 'surviving time' principle from Rajeev Bansal to determine that the notice dated 30.07.2022 was invalid as the time between the original TOLA notice and 30.06.2021 was insufficient. Held that the notice is time-barred and quashed. (Paras 1-6)

B) Income Tax - Surviving Time - Section 3(1) of Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 - The court examined the concept of 'surviving time' between the date of issuance of notice under section 148 read with TOLA and 30.06.2021. Following Rajeev Bansal, the court held that if the surviving time is less than the period required for compliance, the subsequent notice under section 148 is invalid. Held that the notice in this case was issued beyond the permissible time. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 30.07.2022 for Assessment Year 2014-2015 is invalid and time-barred in light of the 'surviving time' principle laid down in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 30.07.2022 is quashed and set aside.

Law Points

  • Reassessment notice under section 148 of Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • validity of notice under TOLA
  • surviving time principle
  • notice under section 148A(b)
  • time bar for reassessment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 514

R/Special Civil Application No. 19800 of 2022

2026-03-03

A.S. Supehia, Pranav Trivedi

B.S. Soparkar, Karan G. Sanghani

Ashokbhai Nanubhai Patel

The Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(2)(6), Surat & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to reassessment notice under section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961

Remedy Sought

Quashing of notice dated 30.07.2022 under section 148 of the Act

Filing Reason

Notice was invalid and time-barred

Previous Decisions

Notice originally issued on 24.06.2021 under TOLA; treated as notice under section 148A(b) after Ashish Agarwal decision

Issues

Whether the notice under section 148 dated 30.07.2022 is invalid and time-barred Whether the 'surviving time' principle applies to render the notice invalid

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the notice is invalid and time-barred Respondent relied on TOLA and Ashish Agarwal to support validity

Ratio Decidendi

A notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued after the extended period under TOLA must be tested on the 'surviving time' principle as laid down in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal. If the time between the original TOLA notice and 30.06.2021 is insufficient for compliance, the subsequent notice is invalid and time-barred.

Judgment Excerpts

This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 30.07.2022 on the ground that the notice would be invalid and time barred. The Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal reported in (2024) 469 ITR 46 (SC) has laid down the law to consider such notice as valid notice or invalid notice depending upon the surviving time left between the date of issuance of notice under section 148 of the Act read with section 3(1) of TOLA upto 30.06.2021 and the issuance of notice under section 148 pursuant to the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Ashish Agarwal (supra).

Procedural History

The Assessing Officer issued notice under section 148 on 24.06.2021 for AY 2014-2015 during extended period under TOLA. After Ashish Agarwal decision, notice was treated as under section 148A(b). Subsequently, notice under section 148 was issued on 30.07.2022. Petitioner challenged the notice by filing Special Civil Application No. 19800 of 2022 under Article 226. The High Court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 03.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 148, 148A(b)
  • Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020: 3(1)
  • Constitution of India: 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Date of Birth Correction Case — Employee Failed to Prove Correct Date of Birth. Labour Court and Industrial Court Orders Set Aside as Employee Did Not Challenge Employer's Evidence and Delay in Raisin...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by MSEDCL Challenging Industrial Court Order Setting Aside Punishment for Violation of Natural Justice. Non-furnishing of enquiry report and lack of hearing before imposing punishment renders disciplinary act...