Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for AY 2017-18 as Time-Barred Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Notice Issued Under TOLA Extended Period Held Invalid Due to No Surviving Time After Ashish Agarwal Directions.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 103
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shell Global Solutions International BV, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 01.08.2022 issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2017-18. The notice was originally issued on 16.06.2021 during the extended period under the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 (TOLA). Following the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal, the notice was to be treated as a notice under section 148A(b) of the Act. The Supreme Court in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal laid down the 'surviving time' principle to determine the validity of such notices, i.e., whether there was any time left between the date of issuance of the notice under TOLA and 30.06.2021. The Gujarat High Court, relying on its earlier decision in Dhanraj Govindram Kella v. Income Tax Officer, held that each case must be examined individually. In the present case, the original notice under TOLA was issued on 16.06.2021, and the fresh notice under section 148 was issued on 01.08.2022. Since no time survived between the issuance and 30.06.2021, the notice was invalid and time-barred. The court quashed the notice and allowed the petition.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Reassessment Notice - Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 (TOLA) - Validity of Notice - The petitioner challenged a notice under section 148 dated 01.08.2022 for AY 2017-18 as time-barred. The court applied the 'surviving time' principle from Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal, holding that since the original notice under TOLA was issued on 16.06.2021 and the fresh notice under section 148 was issued on 01.08.2022, there was no surviving time left between the date of issuance and 30.06.2021, rendering the notice invalid. Held that the notice is invalid and time-barred. (Paras 2-7)

B) Income Tax - Reassessment Notice - Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Time Bar - The court relied on its earlier decision in Dhanraj Govindram Kella v. Income Tax Officer, which held that each case must be examined individually based on the date of issuance of notice under TOLA and the date of supplying information to the assessee. In the present case, the notice under section 148 was issued on 01.08.2022, after the extended period, and no surviving time remained, making the notice invalid. (Paras 6-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 01.08.2022 for Assessment Year 2017-18, issued during the extended period under TOLA, is invalid and time-barred in light of the 'surviving time' principle laid down in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 01.08.2022 for Assessment Year 2017-18 is quashed and set aside as invalid and time-barred.

Law Points

  • Reassessment notice under section 148 of Income Tax Act
  • 1961 issued during extended period under TOLA must be tested on 'surviving time' principle as per Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal
  • Notice under section 148 issued after 30.06.2021 without any surviving time is invalid
  • Each case to be examined individually based on dates of notice and compliance with Ashish Agarwal directions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 510

R/Special Civil Application No. 7407 of 2024

2026-03-03

Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia, Honourable Mr. Justice Pranav Trivedi

Mr B S Soparkar for the Petitioner, Mr Varun K Patel for the Respondent

Shell Global Solutions International BV

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation 1, Ahmedabad

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of notice dated 01.08.2022 under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2017-18 as invalid and time-barred.

Filing Reason

The notice was issued beyond the permissible time limit under the Act and the extended period under TOLA, and no surviving time remained as per the principle laid down in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal.

Previous Decisions

The Assessing Officer issued notice under section 148 on 16.06.2021 during the extended period under TOLA. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Ashish Agarwal, the notice was treated as a notice under section 148A(b). Subsequently, a fresh notice under section 148 was issued on 01.08.2022.

Issues

Whether the notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 01.08.2022 for Assessment Year 2017-18 is invalid and time-barred. Whether the 'surviving time' principle as laid down in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal applies to render the notice invalid.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the notice is invalid and time-barred as there was no surviving time between the date of issuance of the original notice under TOLA (16.06.2021) and 30.06.2021. Respondent argued in support of the notice, but the court found no surviving time.

Ratio Decidendi

A reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued during the extended period under TOLA must be tested on the 'surviving time' principle. If no time survives between the date of issuance of the notice under TOLA and 30.06.2021, the subsequent notice under section 148 issued after the directions in Ashish Agarwal is invalid and time-barred.

Judgment Excerpts

This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 01.08.2022 on the ground that the notice would be invalid and time barred. The Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal reported in (2024) 469 ITR 46 (SC) has laid down the law to consider such notice as valid notice or invalid notice depending upon the surviving time left between the date of issuance of notice under section 148 of the Act read with section 3(1) of TOLA upto 30.06.2021 and the issuance of notice under section 148 pursuant to the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Ashish Agarwal (supra).

Procedural History

The Assessing Officer issued a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 16.06.2021 for AY 2017-18 during the extended period under TOLA. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Ashish Agarwal, the notice was treated as a notice under section 148A(b). Thereafter, a fresh notice under section 148 was issued on 01.08.2022. The petitioner filed the present writ petition challenging the notice as invalid and time-barred. The High Court allowed the petition on 03.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 148, 148A(b)
  • Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020: 3(1)
  • Constitution of India: 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable Despite Alleged License Breach. Deceased was a third party and insurer failed to prove willful breach of policy conditions under Section 149 of Motor...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder Conviction Under Section 302 IPC — Knife Attack During Holi Demand Leads to Death. Conviction Based on Testimony of Injured Eye-Witness and Recovery of Weapon Upheld as Consistent and Credible.