Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16 Due to Non-Compliance with Section 148A(b) and Invalid Sanction Under TOLA. Notice issued under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 without following mandatory procedure under Section 148A(b) and without valid sanction under Section 151 is invalid.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 142
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Rajesh Mansukhlal Gadoya, challenged a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2015-2016. The notice was issued on 04.06.2021, after the new reassessment regime came into effect on 01.04.2021, without complying with the mandatory requirement of issuing a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act. The respondent Assessing Officer relied on the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 (TOLA) to extend the time limit for issuance of the notice up to 30.06.2021. However, the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal (2022) 444 ITR 1 (SC) held that notices issued under Section 148 between 01.04.2021 and 30.06.2021 would be deemed to be notices under Section 148A(b), and the department was required to follow the procedure of issuing a fresh notice under Section 148A(b) and passing an order under Section 148A(d). The department subsequently issued notices under Section 148 in July/August 2022 after following the procedure. The Gujarat High Court, following its earlier decision in Keenara Industries (P.) Ltd v. ITO [2023] 147 taxmann.com 585 (Guj) and the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal (2024) 469 ITR 46 (SC), held that the reassessment notice was invalid due to non-compliance with Section 148A(b) and lack of valid sanction under Section 151 of the Act. The court quashed the notice and allowed the petition.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Reassessment - Section 148, 148A, 149, 151 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Validity of Notice - Notice issued under Section 148 on 04.06.2021 for AY 2015-2016 without complying with Section 148A(b) is invalid - TOLA cannot extend time limit for issuance of notice under old regime after 31.03.2021 - Held that the notice is quashed (Paras 1-6).

B) Income Tax - Sanction - Section 151 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sanction for issuance of reassessment notice must be by the specified authority as per amended provisions - Sanction obtained from officer not authorized under amended Section 151 is invalid - Held that the notice is quashed (Paras 5-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2015-2016 without complying with Section 148A(b) and without valid sanction is sustainable in law

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 04.06.2021 and all consequential proceedings are quashed.

Law Points

  • Reassessment notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act
  • 1961 issued after 01.04.2021 without complying with Section 148A(b) is invalid
  • TOLA cannot extend time limit for issuance of notice under old regime
  • sanction under Section 151 must be by specified authority as per amended provisions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 475

R/Special Civil Application No. 20541 of 2022

2026-03-12

A.S. Supehia, Pranav Trivedi

Fenil H. Mehta for petitioner, Maunil G. Yajnik and Karan G. Sanghani for respondent

Rajesh Mansukhlal Gadoya

Income Tax Officer Ward 1(2)(1), Rajkot

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to reassessment notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2015-2016

Remedy Sought

Quashing of notice dated 04.06.2021 and subsequent proceedings

Filing Reason

Notice issued without complying with Section 148A(b) and without valid sanction

Issues

Whether the reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for AY 2015-2016 without complying with Section 148A(b) is valid Whether the sanction obtained under Section 151 of the Act is valid

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that notice under Section 148 was issued after 01.04.2021 without complying with Section 148A(b) as required under the new regime Respondent argued that TOLA extended time limit for issuance of notice up to 30.06.2021 and subsequent compliance was made after Ashish Agarwal decision

Ratio Decidendi

Reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 after 01.04.2021 without complying with Section 148A(b) is invalid. TOLA cannot extend time limit for issuance of notice under old regime after 31.03.2021. Sanction under Section 151 must be by the specified authority as per amended provisions.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner has challenged notices issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2015-2016 under the old regime by placing reliance on the provisions of TOLA. The notice under section 148 of the Act came to be issued on 04.06.2021, whereas notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act was issued after the decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Union of India and others v. Ashish Agarwal. This Court in case of Keenara Industries (P.) Ltd vs. ITO reported in [2023] 147 taxmann.com 585 (Guj) allowed such petitions.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Special Civil Application No. 20541 of 2022 challenging reassessment notice dated 04.06.2021. During pendency, similar notices for other assessment years were considered by this Court in Keenara Industries case. The matter was carried to Supreme Court which decided in Rajeev Bansal case. The present petition was heard and decided on 12.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 148, 148A, 149, 151
  • Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Variation of Permit for Additional Singles in Bus Service Operations — Rejects Over-Saturation Claim as Bar Only Applies to New Permits Under Section 6(4) of Tamil Nadu Act 41 of 1992. Petitioners Holding Valid Permits Enti...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Modifies Interim Order in Co-operative Bank Recovery Case — Allows Auction Purchaser to Deposit Balance and Take Possession. Court directed the bank to refund excess sale proceeds to the judgment debtor after adjusting dues under ...