Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 148A Procedure. Notice Issued After 01.04.2021 Without Following Mandatory Inquiry Under Section 148A(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 116
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Hardik Girishbhai Desai, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2015-2016. The notice was issued after 01.04.2021, when the new reassessment regime under the Finance Act, 2021 had come into force, which introduced section 148A requiring the Assessing Officer to conduct an inquiry, provide an opportunity to the assessee, and pass an order before issuing a notice under section 148. The petitioner contended that the impugned notice was issued without complying with the mandatory procedure under section 148A(b) and that the sanction under section 151 was not obtained from the competent authority as per the amended provisions. The respondent, Income Tax Officer, relied on the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 (TOLA) to extend the time limit for issuance of notice and argued that the notice was deemed to be a notice under section 148A(b) as per the decision of the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal. The court examined the facts and found that the notice was issued after 31.03.2021 without following the procedure under section 148A(b). The court also noted that similar notices for other assessment years had been quashed by this Court in Keenara Industries (P.) Ltd v. ITO, and the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal had clarified the issues regarding delay and sanction. The court held that the impugned notice was invalid as it did not comply with the mandatory provisions of section 148A and the sanction was not valid. Consequently, the court allowed the petition and quashed the reassessment notice.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Reassessment - Section 148, 148A, 149, 151 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Validity of Notice - The petitioner challenged reassessment notice issued under section 148 for AY 2015-2016 after 01.04.2021 without complying with section 148A(b) procedure. The court held that the notice issued under the old regime without following the mandatory procedure under section 148A(b) is invalid and liable to be quashed. (Paras 2-4)

B) Income Tax - Sanction - Section 151 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Requirement of Valid Sanction - The court noted that the sanction for issuance of reassessment notice must be obtained from the appropriate authority as per the amended provisions of section 151. In the absence of valid sanction, the notice is unsustainable. (Para 5)

C) Income Tax - Delay - Section 149 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Time Limit - The court considered the issue of delay in issuance of notice beyond the time limit prescribed under section 149 and held that the notice was barred by limitation. (Para 6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reassessment notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2015-2016 after 01.04.2021 is valid when the procedure under section 148A(b) was not followed and the sanction under section 151 was not obtained from the competent authority as per the amended provisions.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and quashed the reassessment notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2015-2016.

Law Points

  • Reassessment notice under section 148 of Income Tax Act
  • 1961 issued after 01.04.2021 must comply with new procedure under section 148A
  • including issuance of notice under section 148A(b) and passing order under section 148A(d)
  • TOLA cannot override substantive provisions
  • sanction under section 151 must be obtained from the appropriate authority as per the amended provisions
  • delay in issuance of notice beyond the time limit prescribed under section 149 renders the notice invalid.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 471

R/Special Civil Application No. 17856 of 2022

2026-03-03

A.S. Supehia, Pranav Trivedi

Tushar Hemani (Senior Advocate), Vaibhavi K Parikh, Karan G Sanghani

Hardik Girishbhai Desai

The Income Tax Officer, ITO Ward 3(2)(6)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to reassessment notice under section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2015-2016.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the reassessment notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Filing Reason

The notice was issued after 01.04.2021 without complying with the mandatory procedure under section 148A(b) of the Act and without valid sanction under section 151.

Previous Decisions

This Court in Keenara Industries (P.) Ltd v. ITO allowed similar petitions; Supreme Court in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal decided issues regarding delay and sanction.

Issues

Whether the reassessment notice under section 148 for AY 2015-2016 issued after 01.04.2021 is valid without following section 148A(b) procedure? Whether the sanction under section 151 was obtained from the competent authority as per the amended provisions? Whether the notice is barred by limitation under section 149?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the notice was issued without complying with section 148A(b) and without valid sanction, and is barred by limitation. Respondent argued that the notice was valid under TOLA and as per the decision in Ashish Agarwal, the notice was deemed to be under section 148A(b).

Ratio Decidendi

A reassessment notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 after 01.04.2021 must comply with the mandatory procedure under section 148A, including issuance of notice under section 148A(b) and passing of order under section 148A(d). Non-compliance renders the notice invalid. Additionally, the sanction under section 151 must be obtained from the appropriate authority as per the amended provisions, and the notice must be within the time limit prescribed under section 149.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner has challenged notices issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2015-2016 under the old regime by placing reliance on the provisions of the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020. It is the case of the petitioner that the said notice was issued without complying Section 148A(b) of the Act, as required to be issued with effect from 01.04.2021, under the new regime governing reopening provisions which had came into force. This Court in case of Keenara Industries (P.) Ltd vs. ITO reported in [2023] 147 taxamann.com 585 (Guj) allowed such petitions.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Special Civil Application No. 17856 of 2022 challenging the reassessment notice. During pendency, similar notices for other assessment years were considered by this Court in Keenara Industries and by the Supreme Court in Rajeev Bansal. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 03.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 148, 148A, 149, 151
  • Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bigamy Case Due to Invalid Marriage Certificate. Marriage Registration Under Special Marriage Act, 1954 by Unauthorized Clerk Cannot Sustain Conviction Under Section 495 IPC.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Prime Minister Tenure after Lok Sabha Dissolution Case — Upholds Continuation of Prime Minister and Council of Ministers as Constitutional. Article 74(1) Mandates President to Act on Advice of Council of Ministe...