Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-2016 Due to Non-Compliance with Section 148A(b) and Invalid Sanction Under Section 151 of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the notice issued after 01.04.2021 without following the mandatory procedure under Section 148A and without valid sanction under Section 151 is invalid.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 156
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Arham Share Private Limited, challenged a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2015-2016. The notice was issued after 01.04.2021, relying on the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 (TOLA) to extend the time limit. The petitioner contended that the notice was invalid because it did not comply with the mandatory procedure under Section 148A(b) of the Act, which came into effect from 01.04.2021, and that the sanction for issuance was not obtained from the competent authority under Section 151 as amended. The respondent Assessing Officer argued that the notice was deemed to be a notice under Section 148A(b) following the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal (2022) 444 ITR 1 (SC), and that the procedure was subsequently followed. The court examined the provisions of Sections 148, 148A, 149, 151, and 155 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the impact of TOLA. It noted that similar issues were decided in Keenara Industries (P.) Ltd v. ITO [2023] 147 taxmann.com 585 (Guj) and affirmed by the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal (2024) 469 ITR 46 (SC). The court held that the notice was invalid as the procedure under Section 148A was not followed before issuance, and the sanction was not granted by the authority specified under the amended Section 151. Consequently, the court quashed the reassessment notice.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Reassessment - Section 148, 148A, 149, 151, 155 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 - Validity of notice - The petitioner challenged notice under Section 148 for AY 2015-2016 issued after 01.04.2021 without complying with Section 148A(b) and without valid sanction under Section 151 as per new regime. The court held that the notice was invalid as the procedure under Section 148A was not followed and the sanction was not granted by the competent authority under the amended provisions. (Paras 1-6)

B) Income Tax - Sanction - Section 151 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Requirement of valid sanction - The court held that the sanction for issuance of reassessment notice must be granted by the authority specified under Section 151 as amended with effect from 01.04.2021, and failure to obtain such sanction renders the notice invalid. (Paras 5-6)

C) Income Tax - Time Limit - Section 149 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Delay in issuance - The court considered the issue of delay in issuance of notice under Section 149 and held that the time limits under the new regime must be complied with, and TOLA cannot extend the period beyond 30.06.2021 for notices under the old regime. (Paras 4-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2015-2016 after 01.04.2021 without complying with Section 148A(b) and without valid sanction under Section 151 is valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2015-2016.

Law Points

  • Reassessment notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act
  • 1961 issued after 01.04.2021 must comply with Section 148A procedure
  • Sanction under Section 151 must be granted by the specified authority as per the new regime
  • TOLA cannot extend time limits for issuance of notice under old regime after 31.03.2021
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 463

R/Special Civil Application No. 434 of 2023

2026-03-03

A.S. Supehia, Pranav Trivedi

Tushar Hemani, Vaibhavi K Parikh, Karan G Sanghani

Arham Share Private Limited

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(1)(1), Surat

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to reassessment notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961

Remedy Sought

Quashing of notice issued under Section 148 for Assessment Year 2015-2016

Filing Reason

Notice issued without complying with Section 148A(b) and without valid sanction under Section 151

Previous Decisions

Similar notices for AYs 2013-2014 to 2017-2018 were allowed by Gujarat High Court in Keenara Industries (P.) Ltd v. ITO, and affirmed by Supreme Court in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal

Issues

Whether the reassessment notice under Section 148 for AY 2015-2016 issued after 01.04.2021 is valid without complying with Section 148A(b)? Whether the sanction under Section 151 was granted by the competent authority as per the amended provisions?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that notice was issued without complying with Section 148A(b) and without valid sanction under Section 151. Respondent argued that notice was deemed to be under Section 148A(b) as per Ashish Agarwal decision and procedure was followed thereafter.

Ratio Decidendi

Reassessment notices issued after 01.04.2021 must comply with the procedure under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the sanction under Section 151 must be granted by the authority specified under the amended provisions. Failure to do so renders the notice invalid.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner has challenged notices issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2015-2016 under the old regime by placing reliance on the provisions of the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020. The notice under section 148A(b) of the Act came to be issued on 02.06.2022 after the decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Union of India and others v. Ashish Agarwal. This Court in case of Keenara Industries (P.) Ltd vs. ITO reported in [2023] 147 taxamann.com 585 (Guj) allowed such petitions.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Special Civil Application No. 434 of 2023 challenging the reassessment notice. Similar petitions for AYs 2013-2014 to 2017-2018 were allowed by Gujarat High Court in Keenara Industries (P.) Ltd v. ITO, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal. The present petition was heard and decided on 03.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 148, 148A, 149, 151, 155
  • Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Mesne Profit Case — Landlord Entitled to Future Mesne Profits Despite Decree Silence. Court holds that omission to award future mesne profits in eviction decree does not bar separate proceedings under Order...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Termination of Additional Government Advocate Without Notice — Violation of Natural Justice. Appointment for Fixed Term Cannot Be Terminated Arbitrarily Without Hearing Under Article 14 of Constitution.