Gujarat High Court Allows Revision Application and Quashes Maintenance Order Following Mutual Divorce Settlement Between Parties. The court set aside the maintenance order of Rs.5,000/- per month granted to wife and minor child under Section 125 CrPC as parties settled and obtained mutual divorce.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 194
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the husband (applicant) under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging an order dated 23.09.2019 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Junagadh, in Criminal Misc. Application No.180/2018. The Family Court had granted maintenance of Rs.4,000/- to the wife (respondent No.1) and Rs.1,000/- to the minor child (respondent No.2), totaling Rs.5,000/- per month, along with arrears. During the pendency of the revision, the parties amicably settled their dispute and obtained a mutual divorce by executing a divorce agreement dated 10.01.2023. The husband's advocate submitted that the parties have separated by mutual divorce and produced the agreement. The wife's advocate confirmed the settlement. The State opposed the application citing seriousness of the offence, but the court noted that the dispute was essentially a family matter. The High Court, considering the mutual divorce agreement, particularly paragraphs 3, 7, and 10, held that the revision application deserves consideration. The court quashed and set aside the impugned maintenance order, allowing the revision application and disposing of the connected miscellaneous application.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Maintenance - Mutual Divorce Settlement - Sections 397, 401 CrPC - The revision application challenged a maintenance order of Rs.5,000/- per month granted to the wife and minor child. The parties subsequently settled the dispute amicably and obtained a mutual divorce. The High Court, considering the settlement and the mutual divorce agreement dated 10.01.2023, quashed the maintenance order and allowed the revision application. Held that when parties have settled their differences and separated by mutual divorce, the maintenance order can be set aside. (Paras 1-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the revision application challenging the maintenance order should be allowed in light of the mutual divorce settlement between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The revision application is allowed. The impugned order dated 23.09.2019 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Junagadh, in Criminal Misc. Application No.180/2018 is quashed and set aside. The connected Criminal Misc. Application No.2 of 2021 stands disposed of.

Law Points

  • Settlement of dispute
  • mutual divorce
  • quashing of maintenance order
  • Section 397 CrPC
  • Section 401 CrPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 421

R/Criminal Revision Application No. 1386 of 2019 with Criminal Misc. Application No. 2 of 2021

2026-03-13

Hasmukh D. Suthar

Jaimin A. Gandhi for applicant, Kumar H. Trivedi and Rajendra R. Chavda for respondent No.1, Rohan Raval, APP for respondent No.3

Irfan Ahemadhussain Shekh

Parveen w/o Irfan Ahemadhussain Shekh d/o Kadarbhai Jamalbhai Shekh & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal revision application challenging a maintenance order passed by Family Court.

Remedy Sought

Quashing and setting aside the order dated 23.09.2019 granting maintenance of Rs.5,000/- per month to wife and minor child.

Filing Reason

The applicant (husband) was aggrieved by the maintenance order and filed revision.

Previous Decisions

Family Court, Junagadh, in Criminal Misc. Application No.180/2018, granted maintenance of Rs.4,000/- to wife and Rs.1,000/- to minor child, total Rs.5,000/- per month, with arrears.

Issues

Whether the maintenance order should be quashed in light of mutual divorce settlement between the parties.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant's advocate submitted that parties have amicably settled and taken mutual divorce, producing divorce agreement dated 10.01.2023. Respondent No.1's advocate reiterated the settlement. State opposed the application citing seriousness of the offence.

Ratio Decidendi

When parties to a maintenance dispute have amicably settled their differences and obtained a mutual divorce, the maintenance order can be quashed in revision as the substratum of the dispute no longer exists.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the fact that the dispute is settled between the parties and the parties have mutually separated by executing mutual divorce agreement dated 10.01.2023, more particularly the contents of paragraph Nos.3, 7 and 10, revision application deserves consideration without further.

Procedural History

The Family Court, Junagadh, passed a maintenance order on 23.09.2019 in Criminal Misc. Application No.180/2018. The husband filed a criminal revision application in the High Court on 2019. During pendency, parties settled and executed a mutual divorce agreement on 10.01.2023. The High Court heard the matter on 13.03.2026 and allowed the revision.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 397, 401
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Interim Injunction Order Affecting Third Parties' Property Rights Without Hearing. Interim Injunction Cannot Be Granted Against Persons Claiming Rights in Suit Properties Without Impleading Them as Parties and Provi...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Minority Institutions' Appeal in Teacher Selection Dispute — Amendment to Regulation 17 Not Applicable to Pending Selections. Selection Process Concludes Upon Forwarding of Proposal to DIOS for Approval Under Section 16-FF(3) o...