Gujarat High Court Grants Bail to NDPS Accused Due to Trial Delay and Parity with Co-Accused. Applicant arrested under Sections 8(c), 22(b) and 29 of NDPS Act granted bail as trial not commenced and co-accused similarly situated already bailed.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Rahul @Babalu S/o. Shashipal Sharma, filed a successive regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking enlargement on bail in connection with FIR No. 11993007240374 of 2024 registered with B-Division, Gandhidham Police Station, Kachchh East-Gandhidham for offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 22(b) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The applicant was arrested on 08.04.2024 and had been in custody since then. His earlier bail application (Criminal Misc. Application No. 15449 of 2024) was dismissed by this Court on 14.08.2024. The applicant's counsel submitted that after dismissal of the earlier application, the case had been transferred from one court to another before the learned Trial Court, and therefore the trial had not commenced. It was further submitted that a similarly situated co-accused had been granted bail by this Court. The learned APP opposed the application, contending that the applicant was involved in trafficking of contraband. The Court heard both sides and considered the fact that the trial had not commenced due to transfer of the case, and that a co-accused similarly situated had been granted bail. The Court found that the applicant had been in custody for a considerable period and the trial had not progressed. Accordingly, the Court allowed the application and ordered the applicant to be released on bail subject to conditions, including executing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with one surety, not leaving the local limits without permission, not tampering with evidence, and marking presence before the police station once per month.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Successive Bail Application - Section 483 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - The applicant sought regular bail after dismissal of earlier application; trial had not commenced due to transfer of case between courts; co-accused similarly situated had been granted bail - Court allowed bail considering prolonged custody and parity - Held that delay in trial and grant of bail to co-accused are relevant factors (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, where the trial has not commenced and a similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Application allowed. Applicant to be released on bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with one surety of like amount; conditions: not leave local limits without permission, not tamper with evidence, mark presence before police station once per month.

Law Points

  • Bail under Section 483 BNSS
  • NDPS Act bail considerations
  • parity with co-accused
  • trial delay as ground for bail
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 1067

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 4237 of 2026

2026-03-05

M. R. Mengdey

2026:GUJHC:17161

Darshan M Varandani for Applicant, Mr H K Patel, APP for Respondent

Rahul @Babalu S/o. Shashipal Sharma

State of Gujarat

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Misc. Application for successive regular bail after chargesheet under NDPS Act.

Remedy Sought

Applicant sought enlargement on regular bail under Section 483 BNSS.

Filing Reason

Applicant was arrested on 08.04.2024 and remained in custody; earlier bail application dismissed; trial not commenced; co-accused granted bail.

Previous Decisions

Earlier bail application (Criminal Misc. Application No. 15449 of 2024) was dismissed by this Court on 14.08.2024.

Issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under Section 483 BNSS when trial has not commenced due to transfer of case? Whether parity with a co-accused who has been granted bail is a valid ground for bail?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant's counsel: Applicant in custody since 08.04.2024; trial not commenced due to transfer of case; co-accused similarly situated granted bail; therefore bail be granted. APP: Applicant involved in trafficking of contraband; oppose bail.

Ratio Decidendi

Bail can be granted in NDPS cases where trial has not commenced due to administrative reasons and a similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail, as prolonged custody without trial progress violates the right to speedy trial.

Judgment Excerpts

The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail... He further submitted that the other co-accused, similarly situated to the present applicant, has been considered for grant of bail by this Court.

Procedural History

FIR registered in 2024; applicant arrested 08.04.2024; first bail application (Criminal Misc. Application No. 15449 of 2024) dismissed on 14.08.2024; present successive bail application filed in 2026; case transferred between courts; trial not commenced.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: 483
  • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: 8(c), 22(b), 29
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Dispute. Court holds that mutation entries do not confer title and that the petitioners failed to establish any legal right or entitlement to the property.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging ULCRA Proceedings on Agricultural Land — Land Not Subject to Urban Land Ceiling as It Was in Agricultural Zone on the Commencement Date. The court held that the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation)...