Gujarat High Court Allows Transfer of Family Suit on Consent of Parties — No Objection by Respondent. Transfer of Family Suit No.15 of 2025 from Family Court, Kheda to Family Court, Ahmedabad allowed without expressing opinion on merits.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 120
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Hetalben, filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application under the Gujarat High Court's jurisdiction seeking transfer of Family Suit No.15 of 2025 pending before the learned Family Court, Kheda to the learned Family Court, Ahmedabad. The respondent, Tusharkumar Bharatbhai Rana, through his advocate, submitted no objection to the transfer. The Court, after hearing both sides, allowed the application, disposed of it, and made the rule absolute. The Court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the underlying suit and directed the transferee court to decide the controversy on its merits and in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Transfer of Suit - Consent of Parties - The applicant sought transfer of Family Suit No.15 of 2025 from Family Court, Kheda to Family Court, Ahmedabad. The respondent had no objection to the transfer. The Court allowed the transfer on consent, without expressing any opinion on merits, and directed the transferee court to decide the matter in accordance with law. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Family Suit No.15 of 2025 pending before the Family Court, Kheda should be transferred to the Family Court, Ahmedabad.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. Family Suit No.15 of 2025 pending before the learned Family Court, Kheda is ordered to be transferred to the learned Family Court, Ahmedabad. Rule is made absolute. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Transfer of family suit
  • consent of parties
  • no objection
  • expeditious disposal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 1036

R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR TRANSFER) NO. 2623 of 2025

2026-03-27

Devan M. Desai

2026:GUJHC:22923

Avanika M. Panchal, Vaibhav A. Vyas for applicant; Darshan P. Acharya for respondent

Hetalben D/o Bhupendrabhai Bin Ramanlal Rana W/o Tushar Bharatbhai Rana

Tusharkumar Bharatbhai Rana

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Miscellaneous Civil Application for transfer of a family suit from one family court to another.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of Family Suit No.15 of 2025 from Family Court, Kheda to Family Court, Ahmedabad.

Filing Reason

Applicant sought transfer of the suit, likely for convenience or other reasons.

Issues

Whether the Family Suit should be transferred on consent of parties.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant's advocate argued for transfer; respondent's advocate submitted no objection.

Ratio Decidendi

A suit may be transferred from one court to another when the opposite party has no objection to the transfer, and the court finds it appropriate to do so, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Judgment Excerpts

learned advocate for the respondent has, upon instructions, submitted that opponent has no objection if the Family Suit No.15 of 2025 pending before the learned Family Court, Kheda is transferred to the learned Family Court, Ahmedabad. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on merits of the matter.

Procedural History

The applicant filed MCA No.2623 of 2025 seeking transfer of Family Suit No.15 of 2025 from Family Court, Kheda to Family Court, Ahmedabad. The matter was heard on 27/03/2026, and the respondent had no objection. The Court allowed the application on the same day.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Quashes Endorsement Rejecting SVLDRS Payment, Holds Limitation Extended Due to COVID-19 Supreme Court Orders. Payment made on 30.09.2020 under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, beyond notified deadline of 30...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision That Forward Contracts Not in Prescribed Form Are Illegal and Void. Non-Compliance with Mandatory Bye-Laws Under Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 Renders Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable.