Gujarat High Court Directs Issuance of Scheduled Tribe Certificate in Central Government Format for Appointment and Admission. The court directed the Mamlatdar authorities to decide pending applications for issuance of caste certificate in the prescribed format within two weeks, considering the urgency to secure appointment and admission.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 101
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Makwana Vira Polabhai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat High Court seeking a direction to the Mamlatdar of Porbandar and Ranavav (respondent Nos. 2 and 3) to issue a Scheduled Tribe certificate in the format prescribed by the Central Government. The petitioner belongs to the Rabari caste, which is recognized as a Scheduled Tribe. He had already been issued a caste certificate on 20.06.2011 by the competent authority. However, for appearing in Central Government examinations and for admission to Central Government courses and universities, he required a certificate in the specific format prescribed by the Central Government, which should be in English. The petitioner made applications dated 27.01.2025 to the Mamlatdar, Porbandar, and dated 17.11.2025 to both Mamlatdars, but these applications remained pending. The petitioner argued that without the certificate in the prescribed format, he would lose his appointment and admission opportunities. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that the applications were pending and that appropriate orders may be passed. The court considered the submissions and perused the documents. It noted that the petitioner had already been issued a caste certificate but needed one in the Central Government format. The court directed the respondent authorities to decide the petitioner's applications within two weeks from the date of receipt of the order, considering the urgency. The court also clarified that if the applications were not decided within the stipulated time, the petitioner would be entitled to approach the court again. The petition was disposed of with these directions.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Equality - Scheduled Tribe Certificate - Direction to Issue in Prescribed Format - The petitioner, belonging to Rabari Caste (Scheduled Tribe), had been issued a caste certificate on 20.06.2011 but required a certificate in the format prescribed by the Central Government for Central Government examinations and admissions. The court directed the respondent authorities to decide the petitioner's pending applications dated 27.01.2025 and 17.11.2025 within two weeks, considering the urgency to secure appointment and admission. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction to the respondent authorities to issue a Scheduled Tribe certificate in the format prescribed by the Central Government for appearing in Central Government examinations and admissions.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to decide the petitioner's applications dated 27.01.2025 and 17.11.2025 within two weeks from the date of receipt of the order, considering the urgency. If not decided within the stipulated time, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the court again. The petition was disposed of.

Law Points

  • Direction to issue caste certificate in prescribed format
  • Mandamus for pending application
  • Scheduled Tribe certificate format for Central Government purposes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 351

R/Special Civil Application No. 3156 of 2026

2026-03-16

Hemant M. Prachchhak

Gautam Joshi (Senior Advocate), Vijay H. Nangesh (for petitioner), Nirali Sarda (Assistant Government Pleader for respondents)

Makwana Vira Polabhai

The State of Gujarat & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to issue Scheduled Tribe certificate in prescribed format.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 (Mamlatdar, Porbandar and Ranavav) to issue Scheduled Tribe certificate in the format prescribed by the Central Government for Central Government examinations and admissions.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's applications for issuance of caste certificate in the prescribed format were pending, and without it, he would lose appointment and admission opportunities.

Previous Decisions

The petitioner had already been issued a caste certificate on 20.06.2011 by the competent authority.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction to the respondent authorities to issue a Scheduled Tribe certificate in the format prescribed by the Central Government for appearing in Central Government examinations and admissions.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel submitted that the petitioner belongs to Rabari Caste (Scheduled Tribe) and had been issued a caste certificate on 20.06.2011, but requires a certificate in the format prescribed by the Central Government in English for Central Government examinations and admissions. Applications dated 27.01.2025 and 17.11.2025 were pending before the Mamlatdars. Respondent's counsel (AGP) submitted that the petitioner already has a caste certificate and if applications are pending, appropriate orders may be passed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the petitioner, having already been issued a caste certificate, is entitled to have his applications for issuance of the certificate in the prescribed Central Government format decided expeditiously, considering the urgency to secure appointment and admission.

Judgment Excerpts

To secure the appointment and admission, the petitioner is required to submit the caste certificate issued by the competent authority in the prescribed format as required by the Central Government and the same should be in English. The respondent Nos.2 and 3 are directed to decide the applications of the petitioner dated 27.01.2025 and 17.11.2025 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat High Court. The court issued rule and heard the matter finally with consent of both parties.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Substantial Question of Law Not Arising as Courts Below Correctly Appreciated Evidence and Applied Section 100 CPC.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition of Railway Protection Force Inspector Challenging Dismissal Order for Alleged Misconduct. The Court holds that the disciplinary proceedings complied with Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987, and the acqui...