Gujarat High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Following Amicable Settlement. Court exercises inherent power under Section 528 BNSS to quash FIR for offences under IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act as parties settled differences and complainant consented.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners filed a Special Criminal Application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR No. 11217020211811 registered with Patan 'B' Division Police Station, Patan, for offences punishable under Sections 323, 325, 406, 498A, 120B, 114 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter pertained to a matrimonial dispute between the petitioners (husband and in-laws) and the respondent No. 2 (wife/complainant). During the pendency of the petition, the parties arrived at an amicable settlement. The learned advocate for the petitioners submitted that the matter has been settled and the petitioners have no criminal antecedents. The learned advocate for the original complainant placed on record an affidavit dated 19.02.2026, confirming the settlement and stating no objection to the quashing of the FIR. The complainant appeared before the Court via virtual mode and confirmed her consent. The Court, after hearing the parties and considering the settlement, held that since the dispute is matrimonial in nature and the parties have resolved their differences, continuing the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility. The Court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings. Rule was made absolute.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of FIR - Amicable Settlement - Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Petition under Section 528 BNSS seeking quashing of FIR for offences under IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act - Parties settled dispute amicably and complainant filed affidavit confirming no objection - Court allowed quashing holding that settlement is genuine and voluntary, and continuation of proceedings would be futile (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an FIR registered for offences under Sections 323, 325, 406, 498A, 120B, 114 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act can be quashed on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the petition and quashed FIR No. 11217020211811 registered with Patan 'B' Division Police Station, Patan, and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. Rule was made absolute.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Compounding of offences
  • Amicable settlement
  • Section 528 BNSS
  • Section 320 CrPC
  • Non-compoundable offences
  • Settlement in matrimonial disputes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 982

R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (QUASHING) NO. 10023 of 2023

2026-03-17

Pranav Trivedi

2026:GUJHC:21012

Mr. Shushil R Shukla, Ms. Rini S Shukla, Mr. Arjun M Joshi, Mr. Kanva M. Antani

Kshitijkumar Satishbhai Banker & Ors.

State of Gujarat & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal quashing petition under Section 528 BNSS seeking quashing of FIR for matrimonial offences.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No. 11217020211811 registered with Patan 'B' Division Police Station, Patan, and all consequential proceedings.

Filing Reason

The petitioners, being husband and in-laws, were accused in a matrimonial dispute involving allegations of dowry harassment and physical assault.

Issues

Whether the FIR can be quashed on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute involving non-compoundable offences.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners submitted that the matter has been amicably settled and they have no criminal antecedents. Original complainant filed affidavit dated 19.02.2026 confirming settlement and no objection to quashing. Complainant appeared virtually and confirmed her consent.

Ratio Decidendi

In matrimonial disputes, when parties have amicably settled their differences and the complainant has no objection, continuing criminal proceedings would be futile and an abuse of process of law. The inherent power under Section 528 BNSS can be invoked to quash such FIRs to secure the ends of justice.

Judgment Excerpts

Learned Advocate for the Petitioners has submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and they are now not willing to proceed with the complaint any further. The complainant was present before this Court in virtual mode and has stated before this Court that she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Special Criminal Application under Section 528 BNSS before the High Court of Gujarat seeking quashing of FIR. After hearing, the Court allowed the petition on 17/03/2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: 528
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 323, 325, 406, 498A, 120B, 114
  • Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961: 3, 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 307, 323, 143, 144, 147, 148, 504 IPC and Bombay Police Act Upheld as Pros...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Following Amicable Settlement. Court exercises inherent power under Section 528 BNSS to quash FIR for offences under IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act as parties settled differences and com...