Gujarat High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Private Complaint for Hurt and Robbery Due to Non-Examination of Complainant and Lack of Evidence. Court holds that continuation of proceedings under Section 323 IPC read with Section 114 IPC would be an abuse of process when the complainant fails to appear and support the allegations.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present application was filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) by the applicants-accused, Dhandhal Hardeepbhai Bharatbhai and others, seeking to invoke the inherent powers of the High Court to quash and set aside the impugned complaint being Criminal Enquiry No.24 of 2021 and the proceedings of Criminal Case No.11253 of 2022 pending before the learned 15th Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamnagar, for the offence punishable under Section 323 read with Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The background of the case is that a private complaint was filed by the respondent no.2 (original complainant) against the applicants-accused on 24.05.2021 for offences punishable under Sections 323, 340, 342, 384, 390, 392, 504, 506(1), 34 and 114 of the IPC. Vide order dated 13.12.2022 passed below Exhibit-01 in Criminal Enquiry No.24 of 2021, the learned 4th Additional Senior Civil Judge, Jamnagar, issued summons to the applicants-accused. The applicants then approached the High Court for quashing the proceedings. The legal issues considered were whether the criminal proceedings should be quashed when the complainant has not been examined and there is no evidence to support the allegations. The arguments advanced by the learned advocate for the applicants-accused, Mr. Mangal Gadhavi, were that the complainant had not been examined and there was no evidence on record, making the continuation of proceedings an abuse of process. The learned APP, Mr. Manan Maheta, and the learned advocate for the respondent no.2, Mr. Aditya Khandelwal, appeared and did not seriously oppose the quashing. The court's analysis noted that the complainant had not been examined and no evidence was led. The court held that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of court and that to secure the ends of justice, the proceedings deserved to be quashed. The decision was to allow the application and quash the Criminal Enquiry No.24 of 2021 and Criminal Case No.11253 of 2022 pending before the learned 15th Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamnagar.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of Proceedings - Inherent Powers - Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - The applicants-accused sought quashing of Criminal Enquiry No.24 of 2021 and Criminal Case No.11253 of 2022 pending before the learned 15th Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamnagar, for offences under Section 323 read with Section 114 IPC. The court held that since the complainant had not been examined and there was no evidence on record, continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of court. The court quashed the proceedings to secure the ends of justice. (Paras 1-7)

B) Criminal Law - Offence of Hurt - Section 323 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The complaint alleged offences including voluntarily causing hurt, wrongful confinement, extortion, robbery, criminal intimidation, etc. However, the court noted that the complainant had not been examined and no evidence was led. The court found that the allegations were not supported by any material and quashed the proceedings. (Paras 2-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the criminal proceedings arising from a private complaint for offences under Sections 323, 340, 342, 384, 390, 392, 504, 506(1), 34 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code should be quashed when the complainant has not been examined and there is no evidence to support the allegations.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. The Criminal Enquiry No.24 of 2021 and Criminal Case No.11253 of 2022 pending before the learned 15th Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamnagar, are quashed and set aside. Rule is made absolute.

Law Points

  • Inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS
  • Quashing of criminal proceedings
  • Abuse of process of court
  • Non-examination of complainant
  • Lack of evidence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:22172

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (QUASHING) NO. 6025 of 2026

2026-03-23

VIMAL K. VYAS

2026:GUJHC:22172

MR MANGAL V GADHAVI, MR MANAN MAHETA, MR ADITYA M KHANDELWAL

Dhandhal Hardeepbhai Bharatbhai & Ors.

State of Gujarat & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Miscellaneous Application under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing of criminal proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Applicants-accused sought quashing of Criminal Enquiry No.24 of 2021 and Criminal Case No.11253 of 2022 pending before the learned 15th Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamnagar.

Filing Reason

The applicants-accused were summoned in a private complaint for offences under IPC, and they contended that the complainant had not been examined and there was no evidence, making the proceedings an abuse of process.

Previous Decisions

The learned 4th Additional Senior Civil Judge, Jamnagar, vide order dated 13.12.2022 below Exhibit-01 in Criminal Enquiry No.24 of 2021, issued summons to the applicants-accused.

Issues

Whether the criminal proceedings should be quashed when the complainant has not been examined and there is no evidence to support the allegations.

Submissions/Arguments

Learned advocate for the applicants-accused submitted that the complainant had not been examined and there was no evidence on record, making continuation of proceedings an abuse of process. Learned APP and learned advocate for respondent no.2 did not seriously oppose the quashing.

Ratio Decidendi

When a complainant fails to be examined and no evidence is led in support of the allegations, continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of court, and the inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS can be invoked to quash such proceedings to secure the ends of justice.

Judgment Excerpts

At the outset, learned advocate Mr.Gadhavi appearing for the present applicants-accused has submitted that a private complaint was filed by the complainant against the present applicants-accused on 24.05.2021... Considering the fact that the complainant has not been examined and there is no evidence on record, this Court is of the opinion that continuation of the proceedings would be an abuse of process of court.

Procedural History

A private complaint was filed on 24.05.2021. On 13.12.2022, the learned 4th Additional Senior Civil Judge, Jamnagar, issued summons. The applicants then filed the present application under Section 528 BNSS on an unspecified date, which was heard and decided on 23.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: 528
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 323, 340, 342, 384, 390, 392, 504, 506(1), 34, 114
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Panchayat President and Vice President — Requirement of Prior Notice Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Held Directory. Motion Valid as Substanti...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constable in Culpable Homicide Case — Right of Private Defence Established. Appellant's firing held justified as he acted in self-defence and in discharge of duty to rescue an auto-rickshaw driver from assault.