Gujarat High Court Directs Expeditious Decision on Caste Certificate Verification Representations Under Gujarat SC, ST and OBC Act, 2018. Petitioner's Representations Pending Since 2025 Must Be Decided Within Four Weeks.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 116
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Nayka Vijaybhai Naniyabhai, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with the Gujarat Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of Caste Certificate) Act, 2018, seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.2 (the competent authority) to decide his representations dated 24.03.2025, 24.04.2025, and 02.03.2026. The petitioner was a voter in ward no.4 of Chhota-Udepur Municipality, where elections were held with reserved seats for Scheduled Tribe candidates. The petitioner claimed that his caste certificate verification was pending and that he had made multiple representations to the authorities, but no decision had been taken. The respondents, represented by the Assistant Government Pleader and counsel for respondent No.4, did not oppose the petition. The court, after hearing the parties, observed that the petitioner had been pursuing the matter for a considerable period and that the authority should decide the representations expeditiously. The court directed respondent No.2 to decide the representations within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other interested parties. The petition was disposed of accordingly, with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Gujarat Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of Caste Certificate) Act, 2018 - Petitioner sought direction to respondent No.2 to decide representations dated 24.03.2025, 24.04.2025, and 02.03.2026 regarding caste certificate verification - Court held that the authority must decide the representations expeditiously within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order, as the petitioner had been pursuing the matter for a considerable period (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent authority should be directed to decide the petitioner's pending representations regarding caste certificate verification within a stipulated time frame.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed respondent No.2 to decide the petitioner's representations dated 24.03.2025, 24.04.2025, and 02.03.2026 within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other interested parties. The petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Article 226 of the Constitution of India
  • Gujarat Scheduled Castes
  • Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of Caste Certificate) Act
  • 2018
  • Mandamus for expeditious disposal of representations
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 458

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4001 of 2026

2026-03-23

Hemant M. Prachchhak

Tirth H Shah, Nishit P Gandhi, Akshita Mohuot for Aishvarya, Aditya Davda

Nayka Vijaybhai Naniyabhai

State of Gujarat & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 seeking direction to decide representations regarding caste certificate verification.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to decide his representations dated 24.03.2025, 24.04.2025, and 02.03.2026 expeditiously.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's caste certificate verification was pending and his representations to the authorities had not been decided.

Issues

Whether the respondent authority should be directed to decide the petitioner's pending representations regarding caste certificate verification within a stipulated time frame.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that despite multiple representations, the authority had not taken any decision on his caste certificate verification. Respondents did not oppose the petition and left it to the court's discretion.

Ratio Decidendi

Where a petitioner has made repeated representations to the authority regarding caste certificate verification and the authority has not taken any decision for a considerable period, the High Court under Article 226 can direct the authority to decide the representations expeditiously within a fixed time frame.

Judgment Excerpts

By way of present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with the provisions of the Gujarat Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of Caste Certificate) Act, 2018 petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs... In view of the above, the respondent No.2 is hereby directed to decide the representations of the petitioner dated 24.03.2025, 24.04.2025 and 02.03.2026 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order of this Court...

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Special Civil Application No. 4001 of 2026 before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad. The court issued rule returnable forthwith, and with consent of parties, took up the petition for final hearing. After hearing the parties, the court disposed of the petition on 23/03/2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Gujarat Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of Caste Certificate) Act, 2018:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Reviews High Court Order Declaring Maharashtra Assembly Election Void on Grounds of Corrupt Practices. Limitation for Election Petition Under Section 81(1) of Representation of the People Act, 1951 and Applicability of Section 10 of Gen...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Petition by Employer in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Industrial Court's Order of Reinstatement with Full Backwages for Illegal Termination of Tractor Driver Upheld Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.