High Court Grants Bail in GUJCTOC Act Case Due to Prolonged Incarceration and Trial Delays. Court Found Lengthy Incarceration and Limited Progress in Trial Justified Granting Bail Under Section 483 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an application for regular bail filed by the applicant under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR C.R. No.11208044202185 of 2020. The applicant was arrested on 26.12.2020 and had been in jail for over five years. The applicant's counsel argued that the investigation was complete and the charge-sheet filed, asserting that the applicant was falsely implicated under the GUJCTOC Act. The counsel highlighted that only one witness had been examined out of 108, suggesting that the trial would take a considerable time to conclude. The applicant had been acquitted in three out of four past offences considered by the investigating officer, and the main accused had already been granted bail. The respondent-State opposed the bail application, citing the applicant's past conduct and the nature of the offences. The court considered the lengthy period of incarceration, the status of the trial, and the fact that most co-accused had been granted bail. Ultimately, the court decided to grant bail, imposing several conditions including the execution of a personal bond and restrictions on movement. The court emphasized that the trial court should not be influenced by its preliminary observations while considering the evidence at trial.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Bail Application - Grant of Regular Bail - Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 483 - The applicant was in judicial custody for over five years with only one witness examined out of 108, indicating a lengthy trial ahead. The court found it appropriate to exercise discretion in favor of granting bail due to the prolonged incarceration and the status of the trial (Paras 8-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under the GUJCTOC Act considering the circumstances of the case.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the bail application, ordering the applicant's release on executing a personal bond of Rs.15,000/- with specific conditions regarding conduct and movement.

Law Points

  • Bail application
  • GUJCTOC Act
  • judicial custody
  • trial delays
  • personal bond conditions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 414

R/CR.MA/2289/2026

2026-03-05

DIVYESH A. JOSHI

DHRUV TOLIYA, MR. NIRAJ SHARMA

SHAHRUKH @RAJA AALLARAKHABHAI JUNEJA

STATE OF GUJARAT

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for regular bail under the GUJCTOC Act.

Remedy Sought

The applicant sought regular bail.

Filing Reason

The applicant was in judicial custody for an extended period with limited trial progress.

Previous Decisions

The earlier bail application was rejected based on the applicant's past conduct.

Issues

Entitlement to regular bail under the GUJCTOC Act Impact of lengthy incarceration on bail decision

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant has been in custody for over five years with minimal trial progress. The respondent opposed bail citing the applicant's past conduct and nature of offences.

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised discretion to grant bail considering the prolonged incarceration and the status of the trial, emphasizing the need for timely justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The present successive application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation.

Procedural History

The applicant filed a successive bail application after the earlier application was rejected. The court heard arguments from both sides and considered the status of the trial and the applicant's incarceration.

Acts & Sections

  • Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita: 483
  • GUJCTOC Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Grants Divorce on Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage in Matrimonial Dispute — Husband Directed to Pay Rs. 25 Lakh Alimony. Court exercises Article 142 powers to sever marital ties after 25 years of separation and acrimonious litigati...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Appellant in Cantonment Land Administration Rules Case Upholding Military Authority's Decision to Restrict Mosque Access. Civilian Secretary of Mosque Inside Army Land Fails as Rules Permit Religious Buildings Primarily fo...