Gujarat High Court Directs Authorities to Accept Forest Rights Claims Under Forest Rights Act, 2006 — No Time Limit for Filing Claims. The court held that the filing of claims and vesting of forest rights is an ongoing process with no deadline, relying on a Ministry of Tribal Affairs communication dated 18.07.2022.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 116
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, eight individuals belonging to the Bhil community, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Gujarat High Court. Their grievance was that the respondent authorities (State of Gujarat and its officers) were not providing them the necessary forms to file claims for recognition of their forest rights under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 (Forest Rights Act). The authorities refused to issue forms on the ground that the stipulated time for filing such claims had expired. The petitioners had made a representation dated 21.12.2023 to respondent Nos. 4 and 5 (likely the District Collector and the Sub-Divisional Officer) but no action was taken. The High Court heard Mr. Manoj Shrimali for the petitioners and Ms. Dixa Pandya, learned Assistant Government Pleader, for the respondents. The court noted a communication dated 18.07.2022 from the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India, addressed to the Principal Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Government of Gujarat, which clarified that under the Forest Rights Act, the filing of claims and vesting of forest rights is an ongoing process and there is no deadline or time limit for filing such claims. In light of this communication, the court observed that the forms had since been issued to the petitioners, thereby redressing their immediate grievance. The court directed respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to decide the petitioners' representation dated 21.12.2023 within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the petition, in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of, and rule was made absolute to that extent. The court also directed that the policy be implemented for all tribal districts.

Headnote

A) Forest Rights - Filing of Claims - No Time Limit - Forest Rights Act, 2006 - The petitioners, tribal individuals, were denied forms to file claims for recognition of forest rights on the ground that the stipulated time had expired. The High Court, relying on a communication dated 18.07.2022 from the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, held that the filing of claims and vesting of forest rights is an ongoing process with no deadline. The court directed the authorities to decide the petitioners' representation within eight weeks. (Paras 3-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners were entitled to receive forms for filing claims under the Forest Rights Act, 2006 despite the expiry of any stipulated time limit.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is disposed of. Rule is made absolute. Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 are directed to decide the petitioners' representation dated 21.12.2023 within eight weeks from receipt of copy of the petition, in accordance with law. The policy shall be implemented for all tribal districts.

Law Points

  • Forest Rights Act
  • 2006
  • ongoing process
  • no deadline for filing claims
  • Ministry of Tribal Affairs communication dated 18.07.2022
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 861

R/Special Civil Application No. 15306 of 2024

2026-03-20

Hemant M. Prachchhak

2026:GUJHC:20950

Mr. Manoj Shrimali for petitioners, Ms. Dixa Pandya AGP for respondents

Bhil Chimanbhai Maniyabhai & Ors.

State of Gujarat & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking direction to provide forms for filing claims under the Forest Rights Act, 2006.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought issuance of forms to file claims for recognition of forest rights and decision on their representation.

Filing Reason

Authorities refused to provide forms for filing forest rights claims on the ground that the stipulated time had expired.

Issues

Whether the refusal to provide forms for filing forest rights claims on the ground of expiry of time limit is valid under the Forest Rights Act, 2006.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they were not given forms for filing claims due to expiry of stipulated time. Respondents relied on the communication dated 18.07.2022 from Ministry of Tribal Affairs clarifying that there is no time limit.

Ratio Decidendi

Under the Forest Rights Act, 2006, the filing of claims and vesting of forest rights is an ongoing process and there is no deadline or time limit for filing such claims, as clarified by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs communication dated 18.07.2022.

Judgment Excerpts

as per Forest Rights Act, 2006, the filing of the claims and vesting of forest rights is an ongoing process and there is no deadline/time limit for filing of such claims. the forms have been issued so as to enable the petitioners to lodge their claims, present petition which was essentially filed as such forms for filing the claims was not being handed out to the petitioners, for the present, the grievance is redressed.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Special Civil Application No. 15306 of 2024 before the Gujarat High Court. The court issued rule and heard the matter. The petition was disposed of on 20/03/2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Alienee in Hindu Widow Estate Dispute, Holding Compromise Conferred Absolute Estate on Widow and Reversioners Estopped. Compromise deed using 'Malik Mustakal' granted absolute ownership to widow, and presumptive reversioners who...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder in Hit-and-Run Case, Dismisses State's Appeal for Enhancement. Accused Driver's Intent to Kill Established by Running Over Victim with Car After Argument, Conviction Under Section 307 IPC Mai...