Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Seeking Registration of HAMA Adoption and Issuance of NOC for Inter-Country Adoption. CARA Directed to Register Concluded HAMA Adoption Ex Post Facto and Process No-Objection Certificate Under Adoption Regulations 2017/2022 for Indian Citizens Residing in Australia.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 162
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Akshay Pitamber Sarvakar and another, are Indian citizens residing in Australia. They filed a petition under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India read with the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 (HAMA) and the Adoption Regulations 2017/2022, seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) to register their concluded HAMA adoption ex post facto and to open the inter-country file on the basis of the registered adoption deed and Indian identity documents, and to process and issue the No-Objection Certificate (NOC) and, as applicable, the Conformity Certificate under Article 23 of the Hague Convention or a Support Letter in the non-Hague route. They also sought a direction to the District Magistrate, Gandhinagar, and Respondent No. 3 to conduct an inquiry on the registered HAMA adoption deed and to issue a verification/adoption order and certificate. The petitioners had adopted two minor children under a registered HAMA deed, and the adoption was validly concluded. However, CARA refused to register the adoption ex post facto and issue the NOC, citing procedural requirements under the Adoption Regulations. The court considered the submissions of the petitioners' counsel, Mr. Punit B. Juneja, and the respondents' counsels, Mr. Nikunj Kanara (AGP) and Mrs. Krishna G. Rawal. The court held that the adoption was validly made under HAMA and in the best interests of the children. The court directed CARA to register the adoption ex post facto and to process the NOC/Conformity Certificate in accordance with law. The court also directed the District Magistrate to conduct the inquiry and issue the verification order. The petition was allowed with the above directions.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India - Mandamus - Petitioners sought direction to CARA to register their concluded HAMA adoption and issue NOC for inter-country adoption - Court held that CARA is bound to consider the adoption deed and process the registration and NOC in accordance with law, as the adoption was validly made under HAMA and in the best interests of the children (Paras 1-8).

B) Family Law - Hindu Adoption - Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 7, 8, 11, 16 - Validity of Adoption - Petitioners, Indian citizens residing in Australia, adopted two minor children under a registered HAMA deed - Court held that the adoption is valid under HAMA and entitled to recognition under the Adoption Regulations 2017/2022, and CARA must register it ex post facto and issue necessary certificates for inter-country adoption (Paras 2-8).

C) Adoption Law - Inter-Country Adoption - Adoption Regulations 2017/2022 - Regulations 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 - Registration of Adoption - Court directed CARA to open the inter-country file and process the NOC/Conformity Certificate based on the registered HAMA adoption deed and Indian identity documents, as the adoption was in compliance with HAMA and the best interests of the children (Paras 2-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) is obliged to register a concluded HAMA adoption ex post facto and issue a No-Objection Certificate/Conformity Certificate for inter-country adoption under the Adoption Regulations 2017/2022, and whether the District Magistrate is required to conduct an inquiry and issue a verification order for such adoption.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. CARA is directed to register the petitioners' concluded HAMA adoption ex post facto under the Adoption Regulations 2017/2022 and to open the inter-country file on the basis of the registered adoption deed and Indian identity documents, and to process and issue the No-Objection Certificate and, as applicable, the Conformity Certificate under Article 23 of the Hague Convention or a Support Letter in the non-Hague route. The District Magistrate, Gandhinagar, and Respondent No. 3 are directed to conduct the inquiry on the registered HAMA adoption deed and to issue a verification/adoption order and certificate in the prescribed format, recording validity under HAMA in the best interests of the minors. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

Law Points

  • Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act
  • 1956
  • Adoption Regulations 2017/2022
  • Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India
  • Hague Convention on Inter-Country Adoption
  • CARA Guidelines
  • Best interests of the child
  • Ex post facto registration
  • No-Objection Certificate
  • Conformity Certificate
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 819

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15710 of 2025

2026-03-12

Hemant M. Prachchhak

2026:GUJHC:18812

Mr Punit B Juneja, Mr Nikunj Kanara, Mrs Krishna G Rawal

Akshay Pitamber Sarvakar & Anr.

Central Adoption Resource Authority & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to CARA and District Magistrate regarding registration of a HAMA adoption and issuance of NOC for inter-country adoption.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing CARA to register their concluded HAMA adoption ex post facto, open the inter-country file, and issue NOC/Conformity Certificate; and directing the District Magistrate to conduct inquiry and issue verification order.

Filing Reason

CARA refused to register the HAMA adoption ex post facto and issue NOC for inter-country adoption, despite the adoption being validly concluded under HAMA.

Issues

Whether CARA is obliged to register a concluded HAMA adoption ex post facto under the Adoption Regulations 2017/2022? Whether the District Magistrate is required to conduct an inquiry and issue a verification order for a HAMA adoption? Whether the petitioners are entitled to a NOC/Conformity Certificate for inter-country adoption based on a registered HAMA adoption deed?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the adoption was validly made under HAMA and in the best interests of the children, and CARA was bound to register it ex post facto and issue NOC. Respondents submitted that the adoption must comply with the Adoption Regulations 2017/2022 and CARA's guidelines.

Ratio Decidendi

A HAMA adoption validly concluded under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, is entitled to recognition under the Adoption Regulations 2017/2022, and CARA is obliged to register such adoption ex post facto and issue the necessary NOC/Conformity Certificate for inter-country adoption, as the best interests of the child are paramount.

Judgment Excerpts

The present petition is filed by the petitioner under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India read with the provisions of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 (HAMA) and in the matter under Adoption Regulations 2017/2022 issued by the Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India seeking following reliefs: Issue a writ of mandamus or appropriate direction to Respondent No. 1 (CARA) to register the Petitioners' concluded HAMA adoption ex post facto under Adoption Regulations and/or to open the inter-country file on the basis of the registered adoption deed and Indian identity documents, and to process and issue the No-Objection Certificate and, as applicable, the Conformity Certificate under Article 23 of the Hague Convention or a Support Letter in the non-Hague route;

Procedural History

The petition was filed on an unspecified date. Rule was issued returnable forthwith. With consent of counsels, the petition was taken up for final hearing. The court heard the parties and delivered judgment on 12/03/2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956: Sections 7, 8, 11, 16
  • Adoption Regulations 2017/2022: Regulations 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Communication of Representation to Advisory Board. Failure to Forward Detenu's Representation to Advisory Board Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 10 of MPDA Act.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Under National Highways Act, 1956 for Lack of Personal Hearing. Compensation Determination Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Section 3G(2) Requiring Hearing Before Fixing Amount.