Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Directed to Pay Compensation and Recover from Owner for Breach of Policy Condition. Third-party claimant cannot be denied compensation due to absence of valid driving licence of the offending vehicle driver; insurer must pay and recover.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 120
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Bharatbhai Parsotambhai Bhanushali, was the original claimant in a motor accident claim petition (MACP No.578 of 2019) before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nadiad. He sustained injuries in a road accident on 11.12.2018 when his motorcycle was hit from behind by a motorcycle bearing registration No. GJ-7-CN-5544, driven by respondent No.1 Dineshbhai Khodabhai Raval in a rash and negligent manner. The appellant suffered a fracture in his right wrist and other injuries, and claimed compensation of Rs.3,00,000/-. The Tribunal passed an award on 03.01.2022 but exonerated respondent No.2, the insurance company, on the ground that the driver of the offending motorcycle did not hold a valid driving licence at the time of the accident. The appellant appealed against this exoneration. The High Court considered the legal issue of whether a third-party claimant can be denied compensation due to breach of policy condition by the insured. The Court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Swaran Singh, (2004) 3 SCC 297, which held that even in case of breach of policy conditions, the insurer is liable to pay compensation to a third party and can then recover the amount from the insured. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal's order exonerating the insurance company, and directed the insurance company to pay the compensation amount to the appellant and then recover it from the owner of the offending vehicle.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Third Party Claim - Breach of Policy Condition - Pay and Recover - The issue was whether the insurance company could be exonerated from liability to pay compensation to a third-party claimant on the ground that the driver of the offending vehicle did not hold a valid driving licence. The Court held that the claimant, being a third party, has nothing to do with the breach of policy condition by the insured. Following the decision in National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Swaran Singh, (2004) 3 SCC 297, the Court directed the insurance company to pay the compensation to the claimant and then recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the insurance company can be exonerated from liability to pay compensation to a third-party claimant on the ground that the driver of the offending vehicle did not hold a valid driving licence at the time of the accident.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The judgment and award dated 03.01.2022 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nadiad in MACP No.578 of 2019 is set aside to the extent of exoneration of respondent No.2 insurance company. The insurance company is directed to pay the compensation amount to the appellant and then recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Third-party claimant cannot be denied compensation due to breach of policy condition by insured
  • Pay and recover principle
  • Insurer liable to pay compensation to third party even if driver had no valid driving licence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 322

R/First Appeal No. 4857 of 2022

2026-03-05

Hasmukh D. Suthar

Nishit A Bhalodi for Appellant, Krupali N Bhatt for Respondent No.2

Bharatbhai Parsotambhai Bhanushali

Dineshbhai Khodabhai Raval & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nadiad in MACP No.578 of 2019.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought setting aside of Tribunal's order exonerating insurance company and direction to insurance company to pay compensation.

Filing Reason

The Tribunal exonerated the insurance company on the ground that the driver of the offending vehicle did not hold a valid driving licence.

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nadiad passed award on 03.01.2022 in MACP No.578 of 2019, exonerating respondent No.2 insurance company.

Issues

Whether the insurance company can be exonerated from liability to pay compensation to a third-party claimant on the ground that the driver of the offending vehicle did not hold a valid driving licence at the time of the accident.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant submitted that the insurance company was exonerated on the ground that the driver did not hold a valid driving licence. Relying on National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Swaran Singh, (2004) 3 SCC 297, the appellant argued that the claimant being a third party has nothing to do with such breach, and the Tribunal ought to have passed an order of 'pay and recover'.

Ratio Decidendi

In a motor accident claim, a third-party claimant cannot be denied compensation on the ground of breach of policy condition by the insured, such as the driver not holding a valid driving licence. The insurance company is liable to pay compensation to the third party and can then recover the amount from the insured owner.

Judgment Excerpts

Even in case of breach of any policy condition, the claimant being a third party has nothing to do with such breach. Therefore, the learned Tribunal ought to have passed an order of 'pay and recover'.

Procedural History

The appellant filed MACP No.578 of 2019 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nadiad, which passed an award on 03.01.2022 exonerating the insurance company. The appellant then filed the present first appeal before the High Court of Gujarat.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Bribery Case After Exoneration in Departmental Enquiry. Proceedings Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as Identical Charges Could Not Be Established in Prior Enquiry and Tribunal Found No Evidenc...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Telecom Dispute Over Quantum Meruit Claim Under Section 70 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 — Contractual Relationship Bars Quantum Meruit Recovery. The Court held that where parties are governed by an express contract, a...