Gujarat High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Despite Unlicensed Driver and Unauthorized Passenger. Pay and Recovery Principle Applied as Cleaner in Goods Vehicle is Not a Third Party; Insurer Must Pay Award and Recover from Owner/Driver.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 186
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present appeal was filed by the United India Insurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 31.01.2022 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Mirzapur) in MACP No.370 of 2017. The brief facts are that on 12.12.2016, the deceased was travelling as a cleaner in a Bolero Pickup vehicle. When the vehicle reached the place of accident, the driver drove it in a rash and negligent manner, causing the vehicle to turn turtle. The deceased sustained fatal injuries and succumbed to them. The claimants, being the legal heirs of the deceased, filed a claim petition before the Tribunal seeking compensation. The Tribunal awarded compensation in favour of the claimants. The insurance company challenged the award on the grounds that the driver did not hold a valid driving licence at the time of the accident and that the deceased was an unauthorized passenger in a goods vehicle, whose risk was not covered under the insurance policy. The learned advocate for the appellant submitted that the insurance company should be exonerated from liability. The learned advocate for the respondents opposed the appeal, submitting that the Tribunal had rightly awarded just and proper compensation. The court considered the submissions and the evidence on record. The court noted that the deceased was a cleaner in the goods vehicle and that the driver did not have a valid licence. However, following the principle of pay and recovery, the court held that the insurance company is liable to pay the compensation to the claimants and then recover the same from the owner and driver of the offending vehicle. The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the Tribunal's award, directing the insurance company to pay the awarded amount with interest and recover it from the insured.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Insurance Liability - Pay and Recovery - Driver without valid licence and deceased as unauthorized passenger in goods vehicle - Insurance company held liable to pay compensation to claimants with right to recover from owner/driver - Held that insurer must pay award and then recover from insured (Paras 6-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation when the driver did not hold a valid driving licence and the deceased was an unauthorized passenger in a goods vehicle?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The insurance company is directed to pay the awarded amount with interest to the claimants and recover the same from the owner and driver of the offending vehicle in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Motor Accident Claims
  • Insurance Liability
  • Pay and Recovery
  • Unauthorized Passenger
  • Driving Licence
  • Goods Vehicle
  • Cleaner
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 299

R/First Appeal No. 4758 of 2022

2026-03-05

Hasmukh D. Suthar

Mr. Rathin P Raval for Appellant, Nishit A Bhalodi for Respondents

The United India Insurance Co Ltd

Maliben Wd/o Haribhai Vibhabhai Bharwad Alias Mir & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

Remedy Sought

Insurance company sought exoneration from liability to pay compensation

Filing Reason

Driver of offending vehicle did not hold valid driving licence and deceased was unauthorized passenger in goods vehicle

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Mirzapur) awarded compensation in MACP No.370 of 2017 on 31.01.2022

Issues

Whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation when the driver did not hold a valid driving licence? Whether the deceased being an unauthorized passenger in a goods vehicle absolves the insurance company from liability?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (Insurance Company): Driver had no valid licence; deceased was unauthorized passenger; risk not covered; insurer should be exonerated. Respondents (Claimants): Tribunal rightly awarded compensation; no error in the award.

Ratio Decidendi

Even if the driver does not hold a valid driving licence and the deceased is an unauthorized passenger in a goods vehicle, the insurance company is liable to pay compensation to the claimants with the right to recover the same from the owner and driver of the offending vehicle, following the principle of pay and recovery.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal has been preferred by the appellant – Insurance Company against the judgment and award dated 31.01.2022 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Mirzapur) in MACP No.370 of 2017. Learned advocate for the appellant submitted that the driver of the offending vehicle, i.e., opponent No.1, was not holding a valid driving licence at the time of the accident and therefore the insurance company is required to be exonerated from its liability. On the contrary, the learned advocate appearing for the respondent has strongly opposed the appeal and submitted that the learned Tribunal has rightly awarded just and proper compensation in view of the evidence available on record.

Procedural History

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Mirzapur) passed judgment and award on 31.01.2022 in MACP No.370 of 2017 awarding compensation to the claimants. The insurance company filed First Appeal No. 4758 of 2022 before the High Court of Gujarat challenging the award. The High Court heard the appeal and dismissed it on 05.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition in Eviction Case Based on Securing Alternative Accommodation. Concurrent findings of fact regarding acquisition of suitable alternative residential accommodation upheld under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and L...
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Allows Recreation Club's Petition Declaring No License Required for Playing Skill Games. Rummy and other skill games are not gambling, and clubs do not need a license under the Licensing and Controlling of Places of Public Amusem...