Gujarat High Court Quashes Cancellation of Appointment of Unarmed Police Constable (Female) for Non-Compliance with Principles of Natural Justice — Appointment Order Set Aside as Petitioner Was Not Given Opportunity of Hearing Before Cancellation.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 115
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Anjuben Kalubhai Chaudhary, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat High Court seeking quashing of an order dated 27/05/2022 passed by the Director General of Police and Inspector General of Police, which cancelled her appointment as Unarmed Police Constable (Female). The petitioner had been selected and issued an appointment order on 27/05/2020, but the same was cancelled without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing. The court examined the facts and found that the cancellation order was passed in gross violation of the principles of natural justice, specifically the audi alteram partem rule. The court noted that the petitioner was not given any opportunity to explain or defend herself before the adverse order was passed. The court relied on the settled legal position that any order passed without affording a hearing is void ab initio. Consequently, the court quashed the impugned order and directed the respondents to issue the appointment order from 27/05/2020 with all consequential benefits, including continuity of service and salary. The court also directed that the petitioner be allowed to join duty forthwith.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Appointment - Cancellation - Principles of Natural Justice - Audi Alteram Partem - The petitioner's appointment as Unarmed Police Constable (Female) was cancelled by order dated 27/05/2022 without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing - The court held that the cancellation order was passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice and quashed the same - The respondents were directed to issue appointment order from 27/05/2020 with all consequential benefits (Paras 1-17).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order dated 27/05/2022 cancelling the appointment of the petitioner as Unarmed Police Constable (Female) is sustainable in law when the same was passed without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, quashed the order dated 27/05/2022, and directed the respondents to issue the appointment order from 27/05/2020 with all consequential benefits, including continuity of service and salary. The petitioner was directed to be allowed to join duty forthwith.

Law Points

  • Principles of Natural Justice
  • Audi Alteram Partem
  • Cancellation of Appointment without Hearing
  • Violation of Article 14
  • 16 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 781

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9837 of 2023

2026-03-12

Nirzar S. Desai

2026:GUJHC:19440

Ms. Mamta R. Vyas for the Petitioner, Mr. Mitul Gautam AGP for the Respondent

Anjuben Kalubhai Chaudhary

Director General of Police and Inspector General of Police & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging cancellation of appointment order.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 27/05/2022 cancelling appointment and direction to issue appointment order from 27/05/2020 with all consequential benefits.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's appointment as Unarmed Police Constable (Female) was cancelled without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing.

Issues

Whether the cancellation of appointment order without affording opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

Learned advocate Ms. Vyas submitted that the impugned order was passed without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing, thus violating principles of natural justice. Learned AGP Mr. Mitul Gautam opposed the petition but did not dispute the fact that no hearing was given.

Ratio Decidendi

Any order passed without affording an opportunity of hearing is in gross violation of principles of natural justice and is void ab initio. The cancellation of appointment without show cause notice cannot be sustained.

Judgment Excerpts

At the outset, learned advocate Ms. Vyas clarifies that the typed copy of the order produced at page 14-A is, in fact, the order dated 14.06.2022 and not the order dated 14.02.2022. By way of the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs;

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Special Civil Application No. 9837 of 2023 before the Gujarat High Court challenging the cancellation of her appointment order dated 27/05/2022. The court heard the matter on 12/03/2026 and delivered the judgment.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 14, Article 16, Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Decree in Arbitration Award Dispute, Upholding Validity of Arbitration Agreement and Stamped Award. Specific Ad Hoc Authorisation by Secretary Satisfied Section 175(3) of Government of India Act, 1935, a...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Reversion of Police Officer in IPS Scheme Case Due to Administrative Grounds and Absence of Vacancy. Inclusion in List II under Indian Police Service Scheme Did Not Confer Right to Continue as Officiating Superintendent of Polic...