Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR Against Accused No.4 in Cheating Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. No Prima Facie Case Under Sections 406, 420, 114 IPC as Applicant's Role Not Disclosed in FIR.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 105
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present application was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No.11196013210062 of 2021 registered with Sama Police Station, Vadodara City, dated 04.03.2021, for alleged offences under Sections 406, 420 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The applicant was named as accused No.4 in the FIR. The FIR was lodged by respondent No.2 (the complainant) alleging that the complainant's father was cheated by various astrologers and others. The complainant alleged that his father had taken a shop on rent, later vacated after receiving Rs.11 lakhs. In 2018, the family took a loan of Rs.7 lakhs from a finance company, and later an advertisement was published to sell the house for Rs.40 lakhs. The father approached an astrologer named Hemant Joshi (accused No.1) who deceitfully obtained Rs.35,000 for performing black magic. Subsequently, another astrologer Swaraj Jyotish (accused No.2) was approached, who instructed the complainant to dig in the kitchen, revealing a copper pot with gold ornaments and a pot with bones. Accused No.2 demanded Rs.13,50,000 for performing black magic, for which a loan of Rs.15 lakhs was taken. In April 2019, the house was sold for Rs.25 lakhs, out of which Rs.14 lakhs was given to accused No.2. Later, accused No.3 was contacted and given Rs.2 lakhs for rituals. The applicant (accused No.4) was allegedly involved at the instance of accused No.2. The court examined the FIR and found that there were no specific allegations against the applicant. The FIR merely mentioned the applicant's name without attributing any specific role or overt act. The court held that the ingredients of offences under Sections 406, 420 and 114 IPC were not made out against the applicant. The court observed that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law. Accordingly, the court allowed the application and quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings against the applicant.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Inherent Powers - The High Court quashed the FIR against the applicant (accused No.4) as there were no specific allegations attributing any role to him in the alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust. The court held that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process of law. (Paras 1-10)

B) Indian Penal Code - Cheating and Criminal Breach of Trust - Sections 406, 420, 114 IPC - Prima Facie Case - The court found that the FIR did not disclose any specific role of the applicant in the alleged offences. The allegations were general and vague, and the applicant was merely named as accused No.4 without any overt act. Held that no prima facie case was made out against the applicant. (Paras 2-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and the proceedings arising therefrom against the applicant (accused No.4) for offences under Sections 406, 420 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code should be quashed in the absence of any specific allegations or prima facie case.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. The FIR No.11196013210062 of 2021 registered with Sama Police Station, Vadodara City and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are quashed and set aside qua the present applicant.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Lack of prima facie case
  • No specific allegations
  • Criminal breach of trust
  • Cheating
  • Abetment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 774

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING & SET ASIDE FIR/ORDER) NO. 13055 of 2021

2026-03-24

M. K. Thakker

2026:GUJHC:23484

Shrenik Shah for Harsh M Surti, Ronak Rawal

Dinesh @ Dharmabhai @ Dharmaraj Babulal Joshi

State of Gujarat & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Miscellaneous Application for quashing of FIR

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No.11196013210062 of 2021 and all consequential proceedings against the applicant

Filing Reason

The applicant, named as accused No.4 in the FIR, sought quashing on the ground that there were no specific allegations against him and no prima facie case was made out.

Issues

Whether the FIR and proceedings against the applicant should be quashed for lack of specific allegations and prima facie case under Sections 406, 420, 114 IPC.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant argued that the FIR does not disclose any specific role or overt act attributed to him, and the allegations are vague and general. The respondent State opposed the application, but the court found no specific allegations against the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court held that in the absence of specific allegations attributing any role to the applicant in the alleged offences, the FIR and proceedings are liable to be quashed to prevent abuse of process of law. The court emphasized that the ingredients of Sections 406, 420 and 114 IPC were not made out against the applicant.

Judgment Excerpts

The present application is filed for quashing of the FIR No.11196013210062 of 2021, registered with Sama Police Station, Vadodara City dated 04.03.2021, qua the present applicant, who is named as accused No.4, for the alleged offences under Sections 406, 420 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code. On perusal of the FIR, there are no specific allegations against the present applicant. The FIR merely mentions the name of the applicant without attributing any specific role or overt act.

Procedural History

The FIR was registered on 04.03.2021. The applicant filed the present application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 24.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 406, 420, 114
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR Against Accused No.4 in Cheating Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. No Prima Facie Case Under Sections 406, 420, 114 IPC as Applicant's Role Not Disclosed in FIR.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Defamation Proceedings in Property Dispute Between Siblings. Criminal Complaint for Defamation Under Section 500 IPC Quashed as Alleged Defamatory Statements Were Made in Civil Court Pleadings and Not Published to Third Part...