Gujarat High Court Quashes Family Court Order Directing Mother to Produce Minor Child in Custody Dispute — Order Passed Without Jurisdiction Under Guardian and Wards Act, 1890. The Family Court cannot pass interim orders without any application for interim custody under Section 12 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 157
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mansiben, the mother of a minor child, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 11.09.2025 passed by the learned Family Court, Dhrol-Jodia, below Exh.19 in Civil Misc. Application No. (DC) 03 of 2025. The respondent, Keshavjibhai Damjibhai Ghetiya, the grandfather of the minor, had filed a petition under Section 12 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 seeking permanent custody of the minor son. During the pendency of that petition, the Family Court, without any application for interim custody, passed an order directing the mother to remain present with the minor child before the court. The mother contended that the order was without jurisdiction as no interim relief was sought. The High Court examined the provisions of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890, and noted that Section 12 allows the court to make interim orders only upon application. Since no such application was made, the order was held to be without jurisdiction. The High Court quashed and set aside the impugned order, allowing the petition.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Custody of Minor - Interim Order Without Application - Section 12 of Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 - The Family Court passed an order directing the mother to produce the minor child before the court without any pending application for interim custody. The High Court held that such an order is without jurisdiction as no prayer for interim custody was made under Section 12 of the Act. The order was quashed and set aside. (Paras 1-13)

B) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Article 227 of Constitution of India - The High Court exercised its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 to quash an order passed by the Family Court that was without jurisdiction. The court held that the Family Court cannot pass interim orders suo motu without any application seeking such relief. (Paras 1-13)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Family Court had jurisdiction to pass an interim order directing the mother to produce the minor child before the court without any application for interim custody under Section 12 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the petition and quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 11.09.2025 passed by the Family Court below Exh.19 in Civil Misc. Application No. (DC) 03 of 2025.

Law Points

  • Jurisdiction of Family Court
  • Interim custody orders
  • Guardian and Wards Act
  • 1890
  • Article 227 of Constitution of India
  • Natural guardian rights of mother
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 728

R/Special Civil Application No. 15369 of 2025

2026-03-23

J. C. Doshi

2026:GUJHC:22011

Mr. Premal S. Rachh for the Petitioner, Mr. Henil M. Shah for the Respondent

Mansiben W/o Dharmendrabhai Keshavjibhai Ghetiya D/o Bhagvanjibhai Ganeshbhai Bhimani

Keshavjibhai Damjibhai Ghetiya

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil writ petition under Article 227 challenging an interim order of Family Court in a guardianship proceeding.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the order dated 11.09.2025 passed by the Family Court below Exh.19 directing the mother to produce the minor child before the court.

Filing Reason

The Family Court passed an interim order without any application for interim custody, which the mother contended was without jurisdiction.

Previous Decisions

The Family Court passed the impugned order on 11.09.2025 in Civil Misc. Application No. (DC) 03 of 2025.

Issues

Whether the Family Court had jurisdiction to pass an interim order directing the mother to produce the minor child without any application for interim custody under Section 12 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the Family Court passed the order without any application for interim custody, and thus the order is without jurisdiction. The respondent supported the order, but the court found no application for interim relief was made.

Ratio Decidendi

The Family Court cannot pass an interim order under Section 12 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 without any application seeking such interim relief. The order passed without jurisdiction is liable to be quashed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

Judgment Excerpts

The order passed below Exh.19 has been passed by the learned Family Court, Jodiya – Dhrol in CMA filed by the respondent - original petitioner herein u/s 12 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 seeking permanent custody of minor son 'A'. During the pendency of the petition, the learned Family Court, without having any prayer below Exh.19, passed the following order:-

Procedural History

The respondent filed Civil Misc. Application No. (DC) 03 of 2025 under Section 12 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 seeking permanent custody of the minor. During its pendency, the Family Court passed an interim order on 11.09.2025 below Exh.19 directing the mother to produce the child. The mother challenged this order by filing the present Special Civil Application under Article 227.

Acts & Sections

  • Guardian and Wards Act, 1890: Section 12
  • Constitution of India: Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Decree in Arbitration Award Dispute, Upholding Validity of Arbitration Agreement and Stamped Award. Specific Ad Hoc Authorisation by Secretary Satisfied Section 175(3) of Government of India Act, 1935, a...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere FIRs do not justify preventive de...