High Court Quashes FIR Against Applicant in Money Lending and Abetment to Suicide Case — No Specific Allegations and Essential Ingredients of Section 107 IPC Not Satisfied. FIR under Gujarat Money Lending Act and IPC quashed as mere money transaction and demand for repayment does not constitute abetment to suicide.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 67
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Arpit @ Appu Ramanbhai Parera, filed a Criminal Misc. Application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashment of FIR No.11204047210512/2021 registered at Nadiad West Police Station, District: Kheda, under the Gujarat Money Lending Act and the Indian Penal Code. The FIR was lodged by Vanitaben, sister of the deceased Kalpesh, alleging that four accused, including the applicant, harassed the deceased for non-repayment of a loan with exorbitant interest, leading to his suicide. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Vishal Mehta, argued that except for bare allegations, no specific allegations were made against the applicant; the FIR indicated that the applicant lent money to one J.D., not the deceased, and recovery was sought from the deceased along with other accused. He contended that even accepting the allegations, it was merely a money transaction and demand for repayment, which does not satisfy the essential ingredients of Section 107 IPC (abetment). He also noted that the FIR had been quashed against co-accused Sachin, Dego, and Ashish Parmar by order dated 08.04.2024. The learned APP, Ms. Vrunda Shah, opposed the application, submitting that the deceased, aged 35, committed suicide due to continuous harassment by the accused. The court, after hearing both sides, found that no specific allegations were made against the applicant and the essential ingredients of Section 107 IPC were not satisfied. The court also noted that the FIR had been quashed against other accused. Consequently, the court allowed the application and quashed the FIR against the applicant.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - FIR quashed where no specific allegations made against applicant and essential ingredients of Section 107 IPC not satisfied - Court held that mere money transaction and demand for repayment without more does not constitute abetment to suicide (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR against the applicant under the Gujarat Money Lending Act and IPC for abetment to suicide should be quashed when no specific allegations are made and the essential ingredients of Section 107 IPC are not satisfied.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. The FIR being CR No.11204047210512/2021 registered at Nadiad West Police Station, District: Kheda is quashed and set aside qua the present applicant.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Abetment to Suicide
  • Section 107 IPC
  • Gujarat Money Lending Act
  • No specific allegations
  • Essential ingredients not satisfied
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 721

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING & SET ASIDE FIR/ORDER) NO. 2449 of 2022

2026-03-13

M. K. Thakker

2026:GUJHC:20012

Vishal B Mehta, Vrunda Shah

Arpit @ Appu Ramanbhai Parera

State of Gujarat & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Misc. Application for quashing FIR under Section 482 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Quashment of FIR No.11204047210512/2021 registered under Gujarat Money Lending Act and IPC

Filing Reason

Allegations of harassment for non-repayment of loan with exorbitant interest leading to suicide of deceased Kalpesh

Previous Decisions

FIR quashed against co-accused Sachin, Dego, and Ashish Parmar vide order dated 08.04.2024

Issues

Whether the FIR against the applicant should be quashed when no specific allegations are made against him? Whether the essential ingredients of Section 107 IPC are satisfied in the present case?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant's counsel submitted that no specific allegations were made against the applicant; the money was lent to J.D., not the deceased; mere money transaction and demand for repayment does not satisfy Section 107 IPC; FIR quashed against co-accused. State's counsel submitted that the deceased committed suicide due to continuous harassment by the accused.

Ratio Decidendi

The essential ingredients of Section 107 IPC are not satisfied as there are no specific allegations against the applicant and mere money transaction and demand for repayment does not constitute abetment to suicide.

Judgment Excerpts

It is submitted that except bare allegation in the FIR, no specific allegations were made against the present applicant. essential of section 107 of IPC is not satisfied and in that background the impugned FIR is required to be set aside

Procedural History

FIR registered on complaint by Vanitaben, sister of deceased Kalpesh. Applicant filed Criminal Misc. Application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing. Co-accused obtained quashing order on 08.04.2024. Present application heard and allowed on 13.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 107
  • Gujarat Money Lending Act:
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Construction of Overhead Tank on Panchayat Land; Holds Landowner Had No Legal Right to Obstruct Public Welfare Scheme. Appellant's Writ Petition Seeking Injunction Against Panchayat's Overhead Tank Const...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence and last seen theory set aside as prosecution failed to establish chain of circumstances...